Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

When Does the Price Affect the Taste? Results from a Wine Experiment*

  • Johan Almenberg (a1) and Anna Dreber (a2)

We designed an experiment that examines how knowledge about the price of a good, and the time at which the information is received, affects how the good is experienced. The good in question was wine, and the price was either high or low. Our results suggest that hosts offering wine to guests can safely reveal the price: much is gained if the wine is expensive, and little is lost if it is cheap. Disclosing a high price before tasting the wine produces considerably higher ratings, although only from women. Disclosing a low price, by contrast, does not result in lower ratings. Our finding supports the notion that price not only serves to clear markets, it also influences expectations that in turn shape a consumer's experience. In addition, our results suggest that men and women respond differently to attribute information concerning wine. (JEL Classification: C91, D03, D83, M31)

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Ariely and M.I. Norton (2009). Conceptual consumption. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 475499.

R. Croson and U. Gneezy (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448474.

V. Griskevicius , J.M. Tybur , J.M. Sundie , R.B. Cialdini , G.F. Miller and D.T. Kenrick (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85102.

J. Hasseldine and P.A. Hite (2003). Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 517533.

S.J. Hoch and Y.-W. Ha (1986). Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 221233.

L. Lee , S. Frederick and D. Ariely (2006). Try it, you'll like it – the influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer. Psychological Science, 17, 10541058.

I.P. Levin and G.J. Gaeth (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374378.

C. Mellström and M. Johannesson (2008). Crowding out in blood donation: was Titmuss right? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6, 845863.

H. Plassmann , J. O'Doherty , B. Shiv and A. Rangel (2008). Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences PNAS, 105, 10501054.

G.J. Tellis and B. Wernerfeit (1987). Competitive price and quality under asymmetric information. Marketing Science, 6, 240253.

R.L. Weil (2001). Parker vs. Prial: the death of the vintage chart. Chance, 14, 2731.

R.L. Weil (2005). Analysis of reserve and regular bottlings: why pay for a difference only the critics claim to notice? Chance, 18, 915.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Wine Economics
  • ISSN: 1931-4361
  • EISSN: 1931-437X
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-wine-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 99 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 476 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.