Skip to main content Accessibility help

Kant's Argument for the Principle of Intensive Magnitudes

  • Tim Jankowiak (a1)


In the first Critique, Kant attempts to prove what we can call the ‘principle of intensive magnitudes’, according to which every possible object of experience will possess a determinate ‘degree’ of reality. Curiously, Kant argues for this principle by inferring from a psychological premise about internal sensations (they have intensive magnitudes) to a metaphysical thesis about external objects (they also have intensive magnitudes). Most commentators dismiss the argument as a failure. In this article I give a reconstruction of Kant's argument that attempts to rehabilitate the argument back into his broader transcendental theory of experience. I argue that we can make sense of the argument's central inference by appeal to Kant's theory of empirical intuition and by an analysis of the way in which Kant thinks sensory matter constitutes our most basic representations of objects.



Hide All
Allais, Lucy (2009) ‘Kant, Non-Conceptual Content, and the Representation of Space’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47(3), 383413.
Aquila, Richard (1983) Representational Mind: A Study of Kant's Theory of Knowledge. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Bennett, Jonathan (1966) Kant's Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Descartes, Rene (1985) ‘Principles of Philosophy’. In Robert Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch (eds), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 177291.
Falkenstein, Lorne (1995) Kant's Intuitionism: A Commentary on the Transcendental Aesthetic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Ginsborg, Hanna (2008) ‘Was Kant a Non-Conceptualist?’. Philosophical Studies, 137(1), 6577.
Guyer, Paul (1987) Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haag, Johannes (2007) Erfahrung und Gegenstand: Das Verhältnis von Sinnlichkeit und Verstand. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Hanna, Robert (2008) ‘Kantian Non-Conceputalism’. Philosophical Studies, 137(1), 4164.
Hogan, Desmond (2009) ‘Noumenal Affection’. Philosophical Review, 118(4), 501532.
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pippin, Robert (1982) Kant's Theory of Form: An Essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sellars, Wilfred (1967) Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.
Sellars, Wilfred (2007) ‘The Role of Imagination in Kant's Theory of Experience’. In Kevin Scharp and Robert Brandom (eds), In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfred Sellars. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 454466.
Stang, Nicholas (2013, forthcoming) ‘Adickes on Double Affection’. In Proceedings of the XIth International Kant Congress (De Gruyter).
Van Cleve, James (1999) Problems from Kant. New York: Oxford University Press.
Warren, Daniel (2001) Reality and Impenetrability in Kant's Philosophy of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Wolff, Robert Paul (1973) Kant's Theory of Mental Activity. Gloucester: Peter Smith.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Kant's Argument for the Principle of Intensive Magnitudes

  • Tim Jankowiak (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.