Skip to main content

Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler (Eds.), The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2016. Pp. 384. ISBN 978-90-272-4671-4 (Hb), 978-90-272-6650-7 (E-book)

  • SIQI QIU (a1) and YIRUI LIANG (a1)
Corresponding author
Hide All
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Herman, V. (1999). Deictic projection and conceptual blending in epistolarity. Poetics Today, 20(3), 523541.
Pascual, E. (2002). Imaginary trialogues: conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT.
Pascual, E. (2006). Fictive interaction within the sentence: a communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 245267.
Pascual, E. (2008). Text for context, trial for trialogue: an ethnographic study of a fictive interaction blend. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 5082.
Pascual, E. (2014). Fictive interaction: the conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1866-9808
  • EISSN: 1866-9859
  • URL: /core/journals/language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed