Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:22:07.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Candace Mitchell & Kathleen Weiler (eds.), Rewriting literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other. New York: Bergin & Garvey, 1991. Pp. xxx + 281.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Judith Green
Affiliation:
Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group, Department of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Carol Dixon
Affiliation:
Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group, Department of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, Carolyn D.., & Luke, Allan (1991), eds. Toward a critical Sociology of reading pedagogy. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloome, David (1987), ed. Literacy and schooling. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bloome, David (1989), ed. Classrooms and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Albex.Google Scholar
Grabe, William (1992), ed. Annual review of applied linguistics, vol. 12. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintgen, Eugene R.; Kroll, Barry M.; & Rose, Mike (1988), eds. Perspectives on literacy. Carbondale, IL: Southern lllinois University Press.Google Scholar
Moll, Luis C.; Diaz, Stephen; Estrada, Elette;& Lopes, Lawrence M. (1992). Making contexts: The social construction of lessons in two language. In Saravia-Shore, & Arvizu, (eds.),339–66.Google Scholar
Saravia-Shore, Marietta,& Arvizu, Steven F. (1992), eds. Cross-cultural literacy. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Scribner, Sylvia (1984). Literacy in three metaphors. American Journal of Education 93:621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar