Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:59:58.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David Sutcliffe, with John Figueroa, system in Black language. Clevedon (England) & Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters. Pp. xxiii + 157. Hb £43.00, Pb £16.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Valerie Youssef
Valerie Youssef
Affiliation:
Dept. of Language and Linguistics, University of the West IndiesSt. Augustine Trinidad &Tobago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Language in Society , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 128 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERNCES

Alleyne, Mervyn (1980). Comparative Afro-American. Ann Arbok: Karoma.Google Scholar
Arends, Jacques (1989). Syntactic development in Sranan:Creolization as a gradual process. Dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Baugh, John (1992). Hypocorrection: Mistakes in production of vernacular African American English as a second dialect. Language & Communication 12:317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butters, Ron (1987). ed. Special issue on convergence and divergence in afro-American Speech. American Speech 62:1.Google Scholar
Carrington, Lawrence D. (1992). Images of creole space. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 7: 93–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalphinis, Morgan (1985). Caribbean and African languages: Social history, language, literature and education. London: Karia.Google Scholar
Edwards, Viv(1986). Language in a Black Community,Avon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph (1990). The sociolinguistics of language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holm, John (1988). Pidgins and creoles, l: Theory and structure. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lalla, Barbara, & D'Costa, Jean (1990). Language in exile.UniversityUniversity of Alabama press.Google Scholar
Le page, Robert, & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée (1985).Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko (1986). The universalist and substrate hypotheses complement one another. In Muysken, Pieter & Smith, Norval (eds.), Substrata Versus universals in creole genesis, 129–62. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne (1988). Pidgin and creole languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sebba, Mark, & Le page, Robert (1983). Sociolinguistics of London Jamaican English: Report on the pilot proiect (1981–2). University of York, Dept. of Language (mimeo).Google Scholar
Solomon, Denis (1972). Form, content and thew post-creole continuum. Paper presented at the Conference on Creole Language &Educational Development,University of the West Indies,St. Augustine, Trinidad.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, David, (1982). British Black English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, David,(1984). Language of the Black experience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Welmers, William (1973). African language strcutures. Berkelry: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald (1972). A sociolinguistic descripition of two communities in Trinidad. Dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald (1984). The linguistic variable and syntactic variation in creole continua. Lingua 62: 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald (1988). The creole continuum and the notion of the speech community as locus of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 71:91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar