Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Family as a framing resource for political identity construction: Introduction sequences in presidential primary debates

  • Jennifer Sclafani (a1) (a2)

Abstract

This study investigates the construction of political identity in the 2011–2012 US Republican presidential primary debates. Focusing on candidates’ self-introductions, I analyze how candidates use references to family members and roles to frame their political identities or ‘presidential selves’. Family references are shown to (i) frame candidates’ personal identities as family men/women; (ii) interweave the spheres of home and politics and consequently, their private and public selves; (iii) serve as a tool of discursive one-upmanship in self-introduction sequences; and (iv) demonstrate intimate familiarity and expertise on the topic of national security. This study extends research on family discourse and identity by examining the rhetorical function of mentioning family-related identities in explicitly persuasive public discourse, and contributes to sociolinguistic research on political discourse by examining how family identities serve as a resource for framing political identities. (Discourse analysis, framing, family, identity, political discourse, presidential debates, sequentiality)

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ariel, Mira (1990). Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
Aylor, Brooks (1999). Source credibility and presidential candidates in 1996: The changing nature of character and empathy evaluations. Communication Research Reports 16:296304.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Emerson, Caryl & Holquist, Michael (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, trans. by McGee, Vern W., 60102. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Beck, Christina S. (1996). ‘I've got some points I'd like to make here’: The achievement of social face through turn management during the 1992 vice presidential debate. Political Communication 13:166–80.
Benoit, William L., & Wells, William T. (1996). Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7:585614.
Clayman, Steven E. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society 30:403–42.
Dailey, William O.; Hinck;, Edward A. & Hinck, Shelly S. (2008). Politeness in presidential debates: Shaping political face in campaign debates from 1960 to 2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Duranti, Alessandro (2006). Narrating the political self in a campaign for US Congress. Language in Society 35:467–97.
Goffman, Erving (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gordon, Cynthia (2002). ‘I'm Mommy and you're Natalie’: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother-child discourse. Language in Society 31:679720.
Gordon, Cynthia (2009). Making meanings, creating family: Intertextuality and framing in family interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, Cynthia; Tannen, Deborah; & Sacknovitz, Aliza (2007). A working father: One man's talk about parenting at work. In Tannen, Deborah, Kendall, Shari, & Gordon, Cynthia (eds.), Family talk: Discourse and identity in four American families, 195233. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Trans. by Burger, Thomas & Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hacker, Kenneth L. (ed.) (2004). Presidential candidate images. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Jamieson, Kathleen H., & Waldman, Paul (2003). The press effect: Politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnstone, Barbara (1999). The linguistic individual: Self-expression in language and linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnstone, Barbara (2009). Stance, style, and the linguistic individual. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 2952. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kendall, Shari (1999). The interpenetration of (gendered) spheres: An interactional sociolinguistic analysis of a mother at work and at home. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation.
Kendall, Shari (2006). Positioning the female voice within work and family. In Baxter, Judith (ed.), Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts, 179–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kristeva, Julia (1967/1980). Word, dialogue and novel. In Kristeva, Julia, Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art, ed. by Roudiez, Leon S., trans. by Gora, Thomas & Jardine, Alice, 6491. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lempert, Michael (2009). On ‘flip-flopping’: Branded stance-taking in US electoral politics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:223–48.
Lempert, Michael (2011). Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture 11:241–70.
Lempert, Michael, & Silverstein, Michael (2012). Creatures of politics: Media, message and the American presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Louden, Allan, & McCauliff, Kristen (2004). The ‘authentic candidate’: Extending candidate image assessment. In Hacker, Kenneth L. (ed.), Presidential candidate images, 85102. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Mayo, Edith P. (2000). Party politics: The political impact of the first ladies’ social role. The Social Science Journal 37:577–90.
Miller, Arthur H.; Wattenberg, Martin P.; & Malanchuk, Oksana (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. The American Political Science Review 80(2):521–40.
Myers, Greg (2006). ‘Where are you from?’: Identifying place. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:320–43.
Prince, Ellen (1981). Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–56. New York: Academic Press.
Romm, Joseph J. (1993). Defining national security: The nonmilitary aspects. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Santorum, Rick (2006). It takes a family: Conservatism and the common good. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70:1075–95.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1977). Opening encounters. American Sociological Review 424:671–91.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1984). Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13:311–35.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1993). ‘Speaking for another’ in sociolinguistic interviews. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 231–59. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1996). Narrative as self-portrait: The sociolinguistic construction of identity. Language in Society 25:167203.
Schiffrin, Deborah (2002). Mother and friends in a Holocaust life story. Language in Society 31:309–54.
Stewart, Patrick A. (2012). Debatable humor: Laughing matters on the 2008 presidential primary campaign. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Tannen, Deborah (1994). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. Gender and discourse, 1952. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, Deborah (1998). The argument culture: Moving from debate to dialogue. New York: Random House.
Tannen, Deborah (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tannen, Deborah; Kendall, Shari; & Gordon, Cynthia (eds.) (2007). Family talk: Discourse and identity in four American families. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, Deborah, & Wallat, Cynthia (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 5776. New York: Oxford University Press.
Teven, Jason J. (2008). An examination of perceived credibility of the 2008 presidential candidates: Relationships with believability, likeability, and deceptiveness. Human Communication 11:391408.
Watson, Robert P. (ed.) (2004). Life in the White House: A social history of the first family and the president's house. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Family as a framing resource for political identity construction: Introduction sequences in presidential primary debates

  • Jennifer Sclafani (a1) (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed