Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T02:01:00.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hospital slang for patients: Crocks, gomers, groks, and others*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

David Paul Gordon
Affiliation:
Institute of Human Learning, University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

According to a widespread view, people or experiences that evoke painful feelings of empathy, anxiety, or fear can be dealt with by giving them humorous, derogatory, or evasive names. Such terms allow the release or avoidance of unpleasant emotion. At first glance, hospital slang expressions for patients appear to provide numerous examples of this, but closer inspection suggests very different conclusions. Patient conditions which may be expected to create particular anxiety or distress do not lead to slang labels. Slang terms for patients fall into four categories, three of which characterize types of patients who claim more attention for their conditions than is warranted. The fourth category is made up of positive or neutral descriptive terms.

Hospital slang for patients serves social as well as expressive functions. Rapport within a group and rapport between individuals are distinct phenomena. When embedded in contexts that avoid individualized expressions of emotion or experience, hospital slang may promote group rapport at the same time that it maintains individual distance. In this respect is is similar to other kinds of slang, and other discourse devices. (Slang, discourse negotiation and contextualization, medical anthropology, rapport, expressive function of names and labels.)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. N. (ed), Questions and politeness. (Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology 8.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dundes, A., & George, V. (1978). The gomer: A figure of American hospital folk speech. Journal of American Folklore 91:568–81.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. ([1973]1975) Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2:45–80. Reprinted in expanded form, New York: Harper & Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar