Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T06:40:58.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indexing political identity in the Catalonian procés: A sociophonetic approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2020

José Luis Blas-Arroyo Open the ORCID record for José Luis Blas-Arroyo [Opens in a new window]
José Luis Blas-Arroyo*
Affiliation:
University Jaume I, Spain
*
Address for correspondence: José Luis Blas-Arroyo, University Jaume I, Departamento de Filología y Culturas Europeas, Av Sos Baynat S/N Castellon de la Plana 12071, Spainblas@fil.uji.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article demonstrates the potential for phonological variables to be a resource for the expression of ideology and identity in historical circumstances such as those experienced recently in the Catalonian procés. Based on a corpus consisting of communicative events from sixteen leading Catalan politicians, four Spanish linguistic variants are analyzed. Apart from a handful of structural predictors, the mixed-effects logistic regression analysis shows the robustness of (only) two extralinguistic factor groups: the social origin and the identification of the politicians as Catalan nationalist (mainly pro-independence) or not nationalist. As regards the latter, the most significant of all predictors, the analysis shows how nationalist politicians always favor the sounds mainly associated with vernacular pronunciation in eastern Catalan speech communities ([-ɫ] and [-t]), but at the same time also favor other sounds associated with more canonical and pan-Hispanic prestige variants ([-ð] and [-ð-]). These apparently contradictory results can be explained if the social meaning of all variants is considered around the same indexical field, that of authenticity. In this sense, nationalists seem to ‘appropriate’ the Spanish language by tingeing its expressive habits with uses closer to their language. (Phonological variation, nationalism, ideology, languages in contact, Spanish, Catalan)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 411 - 440
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study is part of the project ‘Structural, social and idiolectal dimensions of linguistic change’, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Ref. FFI2017-86194-P) and the University Jaume I (Ref. UJI-B2017-01). I would like to thank Javier Lara and Brittani Cortés for their collaboration in the Sociolinguistic Lab of the University Jaume I, with several tasks related to the project. I also thank three anonymous reviewers as well as the editors for their insightful and constructive comments. Any remaining errors are my sole responsibility.

References

Alarcos, Emilio (1981). Fonología española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis (2004). El español actual en las comunidades del ámbito lingüístico catalán. In Aguilar, Rafael Cano (ed.), Historia de la Lengua Española, 1065–86. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis (2007). El contacto de lenguas como factor de retención en procesos de variación y cambio lingüístico: Datos sobre el español en una comunidad bilingüe peninsular. Spanish in Context 4(2):263–91.10.1075/sic.4.2.07blaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis (2011). Spanish in contact with Catalan. In Díaz-Campos, Manuel (ed.), Handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics, 374–94. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444393446.ch18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis (2019). La sociolingüística del español en España. In Alonso, Emilio Ridruejo (ed.), Manual de Lingüística Española, 582–613. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110362084-022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David (2006). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Online: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2010). Locating identity in language. In Llamas, Carmen & Watt, Dominic (eds.), Language and identities, 18–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Casanova, Julián (2007). República y Guerra Civil. Barcelona: Crítica/Marcial Pons.Google Scholar
Davidson, Justin (2015). Social dynamics of Catalan-Spanish contact in the evolution of Catalonian Spanish. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign dissertation.Google Scholar
Dowling, Andrew (2014). Accounting for the turn towards secession in Catalonia. International Journal of Iberian Studies 27(2):219–34.10.1386/ijis.27.2-3.219_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Rob, & Schleef, Erik (2016). Identity in variationist sociolinguistics. In Preece, Siân (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity, 50–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:453–76.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87–100.10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2016). Variation, meaning, and social change. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 68–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107449787.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrada, Ana (2012). The loss of intervocalic and final /d/ in the Iberian Peninsula. Dialectologia, Special Issue III:7–22.Google Scholar
Fernández Planas, Ana María (2011). Así se habla: Nociones fundamentales de fonética general y española. Apuntes de catalán, gallego y euskara. Barcelona: Horsori.Google Scholar
García Moutón, Pilar, & Molina, Isabel (2015). La -/d/ en el Atlas Dialectal de Madrid: Un cambio en marcha. Lapurdu 19:277–90.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard; Coupland, Nicholas; & Coupland, Justine (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequence. In Giles, Howard, Coupland, Nicholas, & Coupland, Justine (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics, 1–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511663673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren; Coppock, Elizabeth; & Starr, Rebecca (2010). Indexing political persuasion: Variation in the Iraq vowels. American Speech 85(1):91–102.10.1215/00031283-2010-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren; Friskney, Ruth; & Scobbie, James (2017). Accommodation or political identity: Scottish members of the UK Parliament. Language Variation and Change 29:341–63.10.1017/S0954394517000175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkey, James (2014). Meeting language-in-education policy aims: Catalonia in the twenty-first century. European Journal of Language Policy 6(1):5–21.10.3828/ejlp.2014.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, Antonio, & Quilis, Mercedes (2012). La voz del lenguaje: Fonética y fonología del español. Valencia: Tirant Humanidades.Google Scholar
Hualde, José I. (2014). Los sonidos del español. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Institut d'Estudis Catalans (2016). Gramàtica de la llengua catalana. Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.) (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1):359–83.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. (2009). Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 171–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, Sam, & Moore, Emma (2016). Constructing social meaning in political discourse: Phonetic variation and verb processes in Ed Miliband's speeches. Language in Society 45(1):87–111.10.1017/S0047404515000755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblock, Natalia (2014). Dialect as a marker of political orientation. Paper presented at 2014 LSA Annual Meeting. Minneapolis, Minnesota.10.3765/exabs.v0i0.2403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivoruchko, Julia G. (2008). Prepositional wars: When ideology defines preposition. In Kurzon, Dennis & Adler, Silvia (eds.), Adpositions: Pragmatic, semantic and syntactic perspectives, 191–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.74.10kriCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lapesa, Rafael (1968). Historia de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert, & Tabouret-Keller, Katherin (1985). Acts of identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Molina, Isabel (2016). Variación de la -/d/ final de palabra en Madrid: ¿Prestigio abierto o encubierto? Boletín de Filología 60(2):347–67.10.4067/S0718-93032016000200013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J.; Reynolds, Jermay; Callier;, Patrick & Baptiste, Jessica (2015). Constraints on the social meaning of released /t/: A production and perception study of US politicians. Language Variation and Change 27:59–87.10.1017/S0954394514000192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queen, Robin (2013). Gender, sex, sexuality, and sexual identities. In Chambers, Jack & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 368–86. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118335598.ch17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samper, Jose Antonio (2011). Socio-phonological variation and change in Spain. In Campos, Manuel Díaz (ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics, 98–120. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444393446.ch5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrimpf, Natalie (2013). Politics and dialect variation: A sociophonetic analysis of the Southern Vowel Shift in Middle TN. Online: http://www.linguisticsociety.org/files/3542-6849-1-SM.pdf.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23(3–4):193–229.10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinner, Carsten (2004). El castellano de Cataluña, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110933871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, Julia (2010). From sociolinguistic variation to socially strategic stylisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(5):630–56.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00457.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179–95.10.1017/S0047404500000488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turell, María T. (1996). El contexto de la variación lingüística y su aplicación al estudio del morfema español -ADO. In Gutiérrez, Francisco (ed.), El español, lengua internacional (1492–1992), 639–54. Murcia: Compobell.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing (2008). Rhotacization and the ‘Beijing smooth operator’: The meaning of a sociolinguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:210–22.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00362.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar