Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Written corrective feedback in L2 writing: Connors & Lunsford (1988); Lunsford & Lunsford (2008); Lalande (1982)

  • Dana Ferris (a1)

Written corrective feedback (CF) has been the most heavily researched topic in second language (L2) writing over the past 20 years. As a recent research timeline article in this journal (Ferris 2012; see also Bitchener & Ferris 2012) shows, studies of error correction in student writing have crossed disciplines (composition and rhetoric, foreign language studies, applied linguistics) and have utilized a range of research paradigms, including descriptive text analysis, quasi-experimental designs, and quantitative and qualitative classroom research. This article highlights two landmark studies on this topic, both from the 1980s, representing two of these research traditions. It explains why replication of these two studies would further advance our knowledge about written CF and makes specific suggestions about how the replications should be completed.

Hide All
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing 9.3, 227258.
Bitchener, J. & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge.
Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010a). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics 31.2, 193214.
Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010b). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 19.4, 207217.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12.3, 267296.
Chaney, S. J. (1999). The effect of error types on error correction and revision. California State University, Sacramento, Department of English: M.A. thesis.
Cohen, A. D. & Robbins, M. (1976). Toward assessing interlanguage performance: The relationship between selected errors, learners’ characteristics, and learners’ expectations. Language Learning 26.1, 4566.
Connors, R. & Lunsford, A. A.. (1988). Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research. College Composition and Communication 39.4, 395409.
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M. & Takashima, H.. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36.3, 353371.
Eskey, D. E. (1983). Meanwhile, back in the real world. . .Accuracy and fluency in second language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 17, 315323.
Ferris, D. R. (2004). The ‘grammar correction’ debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime. . .?). Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 4962.
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts & issues. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 81104.
Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32, 181201.
Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd edn). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies (Research timeline). Language Teaching 45.4, 446459.
Ferris, D. R. & Roberts, B. J. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10.2, 161184.
Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A. & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 22, 307329.
Goldstein, L. (2001). For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers? In Silva, T. & Matsuda, P. K. (eds.), On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 7390.
Harap, H. (1930). The most common grammatical errors. English Journal 19.6, 440446.
Haswell, R. H. (1983). Minimal marking. College English 45, 600604.
Hendrickson, J. M. 1980. The treatment of error in written work. The Modern Language Journal 64.2, 216221.
Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System 31, 217230.
Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal 75.3, 305313.
Lalande, J. F. II (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal 66.2, 140149.
Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24.3, 203218.
Lunsford, A. A. & Lunsford, K. J. (2008). ‘Mistakes are a fact of life’: A national comparative study. College Composition and Communication 59.4, 781806.
Porte, G. (2012). Introduction. In Porte, G. (ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118.
Reid, J. M. (1994). Responding to ESL students’ texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly 28, 273292.
Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I.. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20.1, 8393.
Roberts, B. J. (1999). Can error logs raise more than consciousness? The effects of error logs and grammar feedback on ESL students’ final drafts. California State University, Sacramento, Department of English: M.A. thesis.
Santa, T. (2006). Dead letters: Error in composition, 1873–2004. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Semke, H. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals 17.3, 195202.
Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41.2, 255283.
Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32, 303334.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, 327369.
van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N. H. & Kuiken, F.. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 62.1, 141.
Williams, J. M. (1981). The phenomenology of error. College Composition and Communication 32.2, 152168.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Teaching
  • ISSN: 0261-4448
  • EISSN: 1475-3049
  • URL: /core/journals/language-teaching
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed