Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Producing and perceiving the Canadian Vowel Shift: Evidence from a Montreal community

  • Thomas Kettig (a1) and Bodo Winter (a2)

This paper investigates interspeaker variation in the mid and low short vowels of Jewish Montreal English, analyzing the Canadian Shift in both production and perception. In production, we find that young women are leading in the retraction of /æ/ and the lowering and retraction of /ε/. We furthermore find that across speakers, the retraction of /æ/ is correlated with the lowering and retraction of /ε/, providing quantitative evidence that the movements of these two vowels are linked. The trajectory implied by our production data differs from what was reported in Montreal approximately one generation earlier. In contrast to reliable age differences in production, a vowel categorization task shows widespread intergenerational agreement in perception, highlighting a mismatch: in this speech community, there is evidently more systematic variation in production than in perception. We suggest that this is because all individuals are exposed to both innovative and conservative variants and must perceptually accommodate accordingly.

Hide All
AdankPatti, SmitsRoel, & van HoutRoeland. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(5):30993107.
BaayenR. Harald, DavidsonDonald J., & BatesDouglas M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4):390412.
BarrDale J., LevyRoger, ScheepersChristoph, & TilyHarry J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3):255278.
BatesDouglas, MächlerMartin, BolkerBen, & WalkerSteve. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):148.
BighamDouglas S. (2010). Correlation of the low-back vowel merger and TRAP-retraction. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2):431.
BoersmaPaul, & WeeninkDavid. (2013). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.37. Available at: Accessed February 8, 2016.
BobergCharles. (2004). Ethnic patterns in the phonetics of Montreal English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(4):538568.
BobergCharles. (2005). The Canadian Shift in Montreal. Language Variation and Change 17(2):133154.
BobergCharles. (2010). The English Language in Canada. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ClarkeSandra, ElmsFord, & YoussefAmani. (1995). The third dialect of English: Some Canadian evidence. Language Variation and Change 7(2):209228.
de BoerBart. (2001). The origins of vowel systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De DeckerPaul. (2010). Sounds shifty: Gender and age differences in perceptual categorization during a phonetic change in progress. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2):article 7. Available at: Accessed February 8, 2016.
De DeckerPaul, & MackenzieSara. (2000). Slept through the ice: A further look at lax vowel lowering in Canadian English. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 18. Available at: Accessed February 8, 2016.
DiehlRandy L., McCuskerSusan Buchwald, & ChapmanLaura S. (1980). Perceiving vowels in isolation and in consonantal context. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69(1):239248.
DragerKatie. (2010). Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7):473480.
DragerKatie, KirtleyM. Joelle, GramaJames, & SimpsonSean. (2013). Language variation and change in Hawai‘i English: KIT, DRESS, and TRAP. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2):4150.
DurianDavid. (2012). A new perspective on vowel variation across the 19th and 20th centuries in Columbus, OH. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.
EckertPenelope. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1(3):245267.
EckertPenelope. (2008). Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2):2542.
EscuderoPaola, & PolkaLinda. (2003). A cross-language study of vowel categorization and vowel acoustics. In Sole M.-J., Recansens D., & Romero J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions. 861864.
FoxJohn, & WeisbergSanford. (2011). An {R} companion to applied regression. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
FoxRobert A. (1989). Dynamic information in the identification and discrimination of vowels. Phonetica 46(1–3):97116.
FridlandValerie, & KendallTyler. (2012). Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of U.S. English. Lingua 122(7):779793.
GardnerMatthew Hunt, RoederRebecca, & ChildsRebecca. (2016). Social-moderation of a structural sound change? The Canadian Shift in four communities. Paper presented to the 2016 Meeting of the American Dialect Society, Washington, DC, January 7–10.
GormanKyle, HowellJonathan, & WagnerMichael. (2011). Prosodylab-Aligner: A tool for forced alignment of laboratory speech. Canadian Acoustics 39(3):192193.
HarringtonJonathan, & CassidyStephen. (1994). Dynamic and target theories of vowel classification: Evidence from monophthongs and diphthongs in Australian English. Language and Speech 37(4):357373.
HayJennifer, NolanAaron, & DragerKatie. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. Linguistic Review 23(3):351379.
HoffmanMichol. (2010). The role of social factors in the Canadian Vowel Shift: Evidence from Toronto. American Speech 85(2):121140.
HothornTorsten, HornikKurt, & ZeileisAchim. (2006). Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3):651674.
JansonTore. (1983). Sound change in perception and production. Language 59(1):1834.
JansonTore. (1986). Sound change in perception: An experiment. In Ohala J.J. & Jaeger J.J. (eds.), Experimental phonology. Orlando: Academic Press. 253260.
JohnsonKeith, StrandElizabeth A., & D'ImperioMariapaola. (1999). Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics 27(4):359384.
JonesJeffery A., & MunhallKevin G. (2000). Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109:12461251.
KendallTyler, & FridlandValerie. (2010). Mapping production and perception in regional vowel shifts. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16(2):103112.
KendallTyler, & FridlandValerie. (2012). Variation in perception and production of mid front vowels in the U.S. Southern Vowel Shift. Journal of Phonetics 40(20):289306.
KennedyRobert, & GramaJames. (2012). Chain shifting and centralization in California vowels: An acoustic analysis. American Speech 87(1):3956.
KettigThomas. (forthcoming). Now say ‘ah’: Internal factors of shifting and the English low vowel space. In Louviot E. & Delesse C. (eds.), Studies in language variation and change 2: Shifting, switching and alternating patterns in the history of English. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
LabovWilliam. (1990). The interaction of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2(2):205254.
LabovWilliam. (1991). The three dialects of English. In Eckert P. (ed.), New ways of analyzing sound change. New York: Academic Press. 144.
LabovWilliam, AshSharon, & BobergCharles. (2006). Atlas of North American English: Phonology and phonetics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
LangstrofChristian. (2009). On the role of duration in the New Zealand English front vowel shift. Language Variation and Change 21:437453.
LennesMietta. (2003). Collect_formant_data_from_files.praat [Praat script]. Available at: Accessed February 8, 2016.
LiljencrantsJohan, & LindblomBjörn. (1972). Numerical simulations of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 48(4):839862.
LobanovBoris M. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49(2B):606608.
MacchiMarian J. (1980). Identification of vowels spoken in isolation versus vowels spoken in consonantal context. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68(6):16361642.
MartinetAndré. (1955). Economie des changements phonétiques: Traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: Francke.
NiedzielskiNancy. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):6285.
NielsenKuniko. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics 39(2):132142.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: Accessed February 6, 2016.
RakerdBrad. (1984). Vowels in consonantal context are perceived more linguistically than are isolated vowels: Evidence from an individual differences scaling study. Perception and Psychophysics 35(2):123136.
RakerdBrad, & PlichtaBartłomiej. (2010). More on Michigan listeners’ perceptions of /ɑ/-fronting. American Speech 85(4):431449.
RoederRebecca. (2010). Northern Cities Mexican American English: Vowel production and perception. American Speech 85(2):163184.
RoederRebecca, & JarmaszLidia-Gabriela. (2009). The lax vowel subsystem in Canadian English revisited. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 31:112.
RoederRebecca, & JarmaszLidia-Gabriela. (2010). The Canadian Shift in Toronto. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 55(3):387404.
RoederRebecca, & GardnerMatthew. (2013) The phonology of the Canadian Shift revisited: Thunder Bay & Cape Breton. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2):161170.
Sadlier-BrownEmily, & TammingaMeredith. (2008). The Canadian Shift: Coast to coast. In Jones S. (ed.), Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Available at: Accessed February 8, 2016.
SchielzethHolger. (2010). Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1:103113.
Statistics Canada. (2011). Linguistic characteristics of Canadians: Language, 2011 Census of Population. Government of Canada. Available at: Accessed February 6, 2016.
StrandElizabeth A. (1999). Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):86100.
StrangeWinifred, EdmanThomas R., & JenkinsJames J. (1979). Acoustic and phonological factors in vowel identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology 5(4):643656.
StrangeWinifred, JenkinsJames J., & JohnsonThomas L. (1983). Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 74(3):695705.
StrangeWinifred, VerbruggeRobert R., ShankweilerDonald P., & EdmanThomas R. (1976). Consonant environment specifies vowel identity. Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 60(1):213224.
ThomasErik R. (2002) Sociophonetic applications of speech perception experiments. American Speech 77(2):115147.
ThomasErik R., & KendallTyler. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Available at: Accessed February 6, 2016.
VauxBert, & SamuelsBridget. (2015) Explaining vowel systems: Dispersion theory vs natural selection. Linguistic Review 32(3):573599.
WangHongyan, & van HeuvenVincent J. (2006). Acoustical analysis of English vowels produced by Chinese, Dutch and American speakers. In van de Weijer J.M. & Los B. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 237248.
WedelAndrew B. (2006). Exemplar models, evolution and language change. Linguistic Review 23:247274.
WellsJohn. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WickhamHadley, & FrancoisRomain. (2015). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.4.2. See Accessed February 19, 2016.
WillisClodius. (1972). Perception of vowel phonemes in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada, and Buffalo, New York: An application of synthetic vowel categorization tests to dialectology. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 15(2):246255.
WinterBodo, & WedelAndrew B. (2016). The co-evolution of speech and the lexicon: The interaction of functional pressures, redundancy and category variation. Topics in Cognitive Science 8:503513.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Variation and Change
  • ISSN: 0954-3945
  • EISSN: 1469-8021
  • URL: /core/journals/language-variation-and-change
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 92 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 470 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 29th March 2017 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.