Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T18:38:01.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Juan Pablo Luna
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencia Política of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. In 2008 jlunaf@uc.cl
David Altman
Affiliation:
Institute of Political Science at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.daltman@uc.cl

Abstract

Mainwaring and Scully's concept of party system institutionalization (PSI) has greatly influenced the literature on parties and party systems. This article contributes to the “revisionist” literature on PSI by exploring the recent evolution of the concept's four dimensions in Chile. It finds that the Chilean party system is not homogenously institutionalized (as conventionally argued) but is simultaneously frozen at the elite level and increasingly disconnected from civil society. In this regard, it approaches some recent descriptions of the Brazilian party system, a prototypical example of an “inchoate” party system that has gained stability over time without developing roots in society. This article argues that the current operationalization of the concept of PSI is problematic. Not only should all four dimensions of the concept be simultaneously measured, probably through multiple indicators for each one, but their trends across time and space should also be better integrated into the concept's theoretical structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agüero, Felipe, Tironi, Eugenio, Valenzuela, Eduardo, and Sunkel, Guillermo. 1998. Votantes, partidos e información política: la frágil intermediación política en el Chile post-autoritario. Revista de Ciencia Política 19, 2: 159–93.Google Scholar
Angell, Alan. 2003. Party Change in Chile in Comparative Perspective. Revista de Ciencia Política 23, 2: 88108.Google Scholar
Borzutzky, Silvia. 2002. Vital Connections: Politics, Social Security, and Inequality in Chile. Notre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 2002. Parties, Coalitions, and the Chilean Congress in the 1990s. In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 222–53.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 2006. Las virtudes del sistema binominal. Revista de Ciencia Política 26, 1: 226–35.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Siavelis, Peter. 2005. Insurance for Good Losers and the Survival of Chile's Concertación. Latin American Politics and Society 47, 2 (Summer): 122.Google Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E. 2006. The Socioeconomic Roots of Support for Democracy and the Quality of Democracy in Latin America. Revista de Ciencia Política 26, 1: 4866.Google Scholar
Cavedo, José Antonio. 2003. Former mayor and current council member, San Ramón. Author interview. Santiago, July.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). Encuesta permanente, 1991–2008. <http://www.cepchile.cl/dms/lang_1/encuestasCEP.htm>..>Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1998. The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems. Party Politics 4, 4: 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1983. The Electorate: Partisan Dealignment Ten Years on. West European Politics 6, 4: 183215.Google Scholar
Crisp, Brian F. 2000. Democratic Institutional Design: The Powers and Incentives of Venezuelan Politicians and Interest Groups. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Robert J., McAllister, Ian, and Wattenberg, Martin. 2000. The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment. In Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Dalton, and Wattenberg, . Oxford : Oxford University Press. 3763.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1988. El plebiscito y la democracia. Santiago de Chile : FLACSO.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2005. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guerra, Sergio. 2003. Renovación Nacional Council Member, Peñalolén. Author interview. Santiago, June.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1984. The Changing Structure of Political Cleavages in Western Society. In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realigment or Dealigment? ed. Dalton, Robert J., Flanagan, Scott, and Beck, Paul. Princeton : Princeton University Press. 2469.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2005. The Role of Parties and Party Systems in the Policy Making Process. Presented at the conference “State Reform, Public Policies, and Policymaking Processes,” Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, February 28–March 2.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1997. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies 33, 6–7: 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP). 200610. Public opinion surveys. Nashville : Vanderbilt University. <http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop>..>Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2007. Institutionalization of Party Systems? Stability and Fluidity among Legislative Parties in Africa's Democracies. Government and Opposition 42, 2: 215–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2006. Party-Voter Linkages in Two Institutionalized Party Systems: Chile and Uruguay in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2008. Partidos políticos y sociedad en Chile: trayectoria histórica y mutaciones recientes. In Reforma de los partidos políticos en Chile, ed. Fontaine, Arturo, Walker, Ignacio, Navarrete, Jorge, and Larroulet, Cristián. Santiago : PNUD. 75124.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. Forthcoming. Institucionalización de sistemas de partidos: ¿por qué es necesario un nuevo concepto? In Torcal forthcoming.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Torcal, Mariano. 2005. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization. Working Paper 319. Notre Dame : Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame. April.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R.. 1995. Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America. In Building Democratic Institutions, ed. Mainwaring, and Scully, . Stanford : Stanford University Press. 136.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R., eds. 2010. Democratic Governance in Latin America. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mardones, Rodrigo. 2006. Descentralización y transición en Chile. Revista de Ciencia Política 26, 1: 324.Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 2005. August 4.Google Scholar
Montes, Carlos. 2003. Author interview. Santiago, July.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jana. 2007. Partisanship during the Collapse of the Venezuelan Party System. Latin American Research Review 42, 1: 7898.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, and Potthoff, Richard F.. 2005. The Components of Elections: District Heterogeneity, District-Time Effects, and Volatility. Electoral Studies 24, 1: 1740.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2008. Legislative Candidate Selection in Chile. In Pathways to Power in Latin America, ed. Siavelis, Peter and Morgenstern, Scott. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press. 92118.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio, and Rojas, Priscilla. 2005. Representación y tamaño de los distritos electorales en Chile, 1988–2002. Revista de Ciencia Política 25, 2: 91116.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, Phillip. 1995. Organizing Civil Society: The Popular Sectors and the Struggle for Democracy in Chile. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Mark, Zovatto, Daniel, Carrillo, Fernando, and Allamand, Andrés. 2003. La política importa: democracia y desarrollo en América Latina. Washington , DC : International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Payne, Mark, Zovatto, Daniel, Carrillo, Fernando, and Díaz, Mercedes Mateo. 2006. La política importa: democracia y desarrollo en América Latina. Washington , DC : International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Mogens. 1983. Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems, 1948–1977: Explorations in Explanation. In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, ed. Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter. Beverly Hills : Sage. 2966.Google Scholar
Posner, Paul. 1999. Popular Representation and Political Disattisfaction in Chile's New Democracy. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 41, 1 (Spring): 5985.Google Scholar
Posner, Paul. 2004. Local Democracy and the Transformation of Popular Participation in Chile. Latin American Politics and Society 46, 3 (Fall): 5581.Google Scholar
Cono Sul, Projeto. 1988. Survey. São Paulo : Universidad de Campinhas.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M., and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: a Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review 93, 3: 575–90.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Rodríguez, Leticia. 2003. Polarización en el Chile postautoritario. Elites partidistas. In Política, dinero e institucionalización partidista en América Latina, ed. Alcántara Sáez, Manuel and Martínez Barahona, Elena. Mexico City : Universidad Iberoamericana/IFE/FLACSO. 195243.Google Scholar
Scully, Timothy R. 1992. Rethinking the Center: Cleavages, Critical Junctures, and Party Evolution in Chile. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2000. The President and Congress in Post-Authoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park : Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2004. Sistema electoral, desintegración de coaliciones y democracia en Chile: ¿El fin de la Concertación? Revista de Ciencia Política 24, 1: 5880.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2009. Enclaves de la transición y democracia chilena. Revista de Ciencia Política 29, 1: 321.Google Scholar
Stein, Ernesto, Tommasi, Mariano, Echebarría, Koldo, Lora, Eduardo, and Payne, Mark, eds. 2006. The Politics of Policies: Economic and Social Progress in Latin America. Washington , DC : Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Tironi, Eugenio, and Agüero, Felipe. 1999. ¿Sobrevivirá el nuevo paisaje político chileno? Estudios Públicos 74 (Autumn): 151–68.Google Scholar
Tohá, Carolina. 2003. Congressional Candidate, Partido para la Democracia. Author interview. Santiago, June.Google Scholar
Torcal, Mariano, ed. Forthcoming. Institucionalización del sistema de partidos en América Latina: medición, causas y consecuencias. Madrid : CIS-CIDOB.Google Scholar
Torcal, Mariano, and Mainwaring, Scott. 2003. The Political Recrafting of Social Bases of Party Competition: Chile, 1973–95. British Journal of Political Science 33, 1: 5584.Google Scholar
Toro Maureira, Sergio. 2008. Jóvenes y generaciones políticas en el Chile post-autoritario. Una mirada a través de los resultados de Lapop. Revista de Ciencia Política 28, 3: 143–60.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1977. Political Brokers in Chile: Local Government in a Centralized Polity. Durham : Duke University Press.Google Scholar
World Values Survey. Multiple years. <http://worldvaluessurvey.org>..>Google Scholar
Zucco, César. Forthcoming. Estabilidad sin raíces: institucionalización de sistemas de partidos en Brasil. In Torcal forthcoming.Google Scholar