Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Right to Asylum: Britain's 1905 Aliens Act and the Evolution of Refugee Law

Abstract

From the 1880s, states and self-governing colonies in North and South America, across Australasia, and in southern Africa began introducing laws to regulate the entry of newly defined “undesirable immigrants.” This was a trend that intensified exclusionary powers originally passed in the 1850s to regulate Chinese migration, initially in the context of the gold rushes in California and the self-governing colony of Victoria in Australia. The entry and movement of other populations also began to be regulated toward the end of the century, in particular the increasing number of certain Europeans migrating to the United States. It is perhaps unsurprising, then, that Britain followed this legal trend with the introduction of the 1905 Aliens Act, although it was a latecomer when situated in the global context, and certainly within the context of its own Empire. The Aliens Act was passed in response to the persecution of Eastern European Jews and their forced migration, mainly from the Russian Empire into Britain. It defined for the first time in British law the notion of the “undesirable immigrant,” criteria to exclude would-be immigrants, and exemptions from those exclusions. The Aliens Act has been analyzed by historians and legal scholars as an aspect of the history of British immigration law on the one hand, and of British Jewry and British anti-Semitism on the other. Exclusion based on ethnic and religious grounds has dominated both analyses. Thus, the Act has been framed as the major antecedent to Britain's more substantial and enduring legislative moves in the 1960s to restrict entry, regulate borders, and nominate and identify “undesirable” entrants effectively (if not explicitly) on racial grounds.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Alison.bashford@sydney.edu.au
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Marilyn Lake and Henry Reynolds, Drawing the Global Color Line: White Men's Countries and the International Challenge of Racial Equality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)

Erika Pani has explored early nineteenth century laws in the American context, “Saving the Nation through Exclusion: Alien Laws in the Early Republic in the United States and Mexico,” The Americas 65 (2008): 217–46

Jeremy Martens, “A Transnational History of Immigration Restriction,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 34 (2006): 323–44.

Alison Bashford and Catie Gilchrist, “The Colonial History of the 1905 Aliens Act,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 40 (2012): 409–37.

Helena Wray, “The Aliens Act 1905 and the Immigration Act Dilemma,” Journal of Law and Society 33 (2006): 302–23.

Benjamin J. Lammers, “Alien Dick Whittingtons: The National Imagination and the Jewish East End,” Jewish Culture and History 1 (1998): 4153

David Feldman, “Jews and the British Empire, c. 1900,History Workshop Journal 63 (2007): 7089.

Krista Maglen, “Importing Trachoma: The Introduction into Britain of American Ideas of an ‘Immigrant Disease’, 1892–1906,” Immigrants and Minorities 23 (2005): 8099.

Alison Bashford, “Insanity and Immigration Restriction,” in Migration, Health and Ethnicity in the Modern World, ed. Hilary Marland and Catherine Cox (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 1435).

Marilyn Lake, “Chinese Colonists Assert Their ‘Common Human Rights’: Cosmopolitanism as Subject and Method of History,” Journal of World History 21 (2010): 375–92

Maurizio Isabella, Risorgimento in Exile: Italian Émigrés and the Liberal International in the Post-Napoleonic Era (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)

Elina Multanen, “British Policy Towards Russian Refugees in the Aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution,” Revolutionary Russia 12 (1999): 4468.

Paul Knepper, “The Other Invisible Hand: Jews and Anarchists in London before the First World War,” Jewish History 22 (2008): 295315.

James Brown Scott, “Review of The Aliens Act,” The American Journal of International Law 1 (1907)

Nancy L. Green, “The Politics of Exit: Reversing the Immigration Paradigm,” Journal of Modern History 77 (2005): 263–89.

Robert J. Beck, “Britain and the 1933 Refugee Convention: National or State Sovereignty?International Journal of Refugee Law 11 (1999): 621–22.

Guy S. Goodwin-Gill, “Editorial: The International Protection of Refugees: What Future?International Journal of Refugee Law 12 (2000)

Louise W. Holborn, “The Legal Status of Political Refugees, 1920–1938,” American Journal of International Law 32 (1938)

Colin Holmes, John Bull's Island: Immigration and British Society, 1871–1971 (London: Macmillan, 1988)

James Hathaway, The Law of Refugee Status (Toronto: Butterworths, 1991).

Gregor Noll, “Seeking Asylum at Embassies: A Right to Entry under International Law?International Journal of Refugee Law 17 (2005)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Law and History Review
  • ISSN: 0738-2480
  • EISSN: 1939-9022
  • URL: /core/journals/law-and-history-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score