Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-30T15:59:54.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Room for Manoeuver: Paradox, Program, or Pandora's Box?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium Comment
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Coombe, Rosemary J., “Room for Manoeuver: Toward Theory of Practice in Critical Legal Studies,” 14 Law & Soc. Inquiry 69 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Trubek, David M. & Esser, John, “‘Critical Empiricism’ in American Legal Studies: Paradox, Program, or Pandora's Box?” 14 Law & Soc. Inquiry 3 (1989).Google Scholar

3 Gaston Bachelard, Le Nouvel Esprit Scientifique (Paris: P. U. F., 1971); id, Gaston Bachelard, La Formation de l'Esprit Scientifique (Paris: J. Vrin, 1972).Google Scholar

4 Jean Piager, ed., Logique et Connaisance Scientifique 7 (Paris: Gallimard, 1967).Google Scholar

5 Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Um Discurso Sobre as Ciecias (Porto: Afrontamento, 1988); id., Introduo a Uma Ciecia Pós-Modema (Porto: Afrontamento, 1989; forthcoming).Google Scholar

6 Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophische Untersuchungen (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971).Google Scholar

7 Martin Heidigger, Vom Wesen des Grundes (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1955); id., Was ist Metaphysik? (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1960); id., Vom Wesen der Wahrheit (Frankfurt: Kostermann, 1961).Google Scholar

8 John Dewey, Essays in Experimental Logic (New York: Dover, 1916); Id., Human Nature and Conduct (New York: Modern Library, 1957); id., Reconstruction in Philosophy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957); id., The Quest for Certainty (New York: Capricorn Books, 1960); id., Philosophy of Education (Totowa, N. J.: Littlefields, Adams, 1975).Google Scholar

9 Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature 390 (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

10 Id. at 320Google Scholar

11 Theodor Adorno, Against Epistemology: A Metacritique (Cambridge, Mass.: M. I. T. Press, 1984).Google Scholar

12 See my works cited in note 5.Google Scholar

13 Pierre Bourdieu & J.-J, Chamboredon, Le Métier de Sociologue (Paris: Mouton, 1968).Google Scholar

14 de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, “On Modes of Production of Law and Social Power,” 13 Intern'l J. Soc. L. 299 (1985).Google Scholar

15 Pierre Bourdieu & J. C. Passeron, La Reproduction (Paris: Minuit, 1970); Pierre Bourdieu, La Distinction (Paris: Minuit, 1979).Google Scholar

16 Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar

17 Pierre Bourdieu, Leçon sur la Leçon 56 (Paris: Minuit, 1982).Google Scholar

18 C. Wright Mills, The Sociological Imagination (London: Oxford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

19 Howard Becker, “Whose Side Are We On?”in L. Reynolds & J. Reynolds, eds., The Sociology of Sociology (New York: David McKay, 1970).Google Scholar

20 Alvin Gouldner, The Coming Crisis of Westem Sociology (New York: Avon, 1971).Google Scholar

21 Paul Bohannon, ed., Law and Warfare 45 (Garden City, N. Y.: Natural History Press, 1967).Google Scholar

22 Boaventura de Sousa Santos, “The Postmodern Transition: Law and Politics” (Amherst College, 1988).Google Scholar

23 Jon Elster, Ulysses and the Sirens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984); id., Sour Grapes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

24 Maria Irene Santos, “Poetry in America: The Question of Gender,”Genre XX at 153, 156 (1987).Google Scholar

25 Ivan Illich, Tools for Conviviality (New York: Harper & Row, 1973).Google Scholar

26 de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, “Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Post-modern Conception of Law,” 14 J. L. & Soc'y 279 (1987).Google Scholar

27 Jameson, Fredric, “Third-World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism,” 15 Social Text 65, 77 (1986).Google Scholar

28 Id. at 85.Google Scholar

29 Id. at 69.Google Scholar