No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Natura 2000 network enhances the protection of rare epiphytic lichens: evidence from forest sites of Central Italy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2023
Abstract
Although epiphytic lichens are widely adopted as environmental indicators, they are not yet included among the target species listed in Annex II of the Habitats Directive, to which the system of protected areas of the Natura 2000 network refers. In this work, we aim to test the effectiveness of this system, mainly designed for the conservation of other groups of species, in protecting lichen species richness. For this purpose, we considered a case study (Central Italy) with half of the territory included in protected areas. Statistical differences in species richness and lichen communities were tested between sites located in 16 Protected Areas (PA) and 11 Non-Protected Areas (NPA) using non-parametric tests, multi-response permutation procedures (MRPP), non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and Indicator Species Analysis (ISA). Despite the broad overlap between epiphytic lichen communities of NPAs and PAs and a similar number of total and common species, PAs contain a significantly higher number of nationally rare and extremely rare species, including cyanolichens. These results are also confirmed by the indicator analysis. Although the Natura 2000 network does not explicitly address the conservation of lichens, the protected areas in our study can play a role in protecting the diversity of epiphytic lichens, especially nationally rare and endangered species. However, the future inclusion of red-listed epiphytic lichens among the target species of Annex II of the Habitats Directive would be welcome to better protect these organisms on a European level.
- Type
- Standard Paper
- Information
- The Lichenologist , Volume 55 , Special Issue 5: Special issue dedicated to Professor Pier Luigi Nimis , September 2023 , pp. 423 - 429
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Lichen Society
References
Allen, JL and Lendemer, JC (2016) Climate change impacts on endemic, high-elevation lichens in a biodiversity hotspot. Biodiversity and Conservation 25, 555–568.Google Scholar
Alonzi, A, Ercole, S and Piccini, C (2006) La protezione delle specie della flora e della fauna selvatica: quadro di riferimento legislativo regionale [Protection of wild species of flora and fauna: regional legislative reference framework]. APAT Rapporti 75/2006. Rome: ISPRA.Google Scholar
ANPA (2001) I. B. L. Indice di Biodiversità Lichenica. Manuali e Linee Guida 2/2001. Roma: ANPA.Google Scholar
Aragón, G, Martínez, I, Izquierdo, P, Belinchón, R and Escudero, A (2010) Effects of forest management on epiphytic lichen diversity in Mediterranean forests. Applied Vegetation Science 13, 183–194.Google Scholar
Ardelean, IV, Keller, C and Scheidegger, C (2015) Effects of management on lichen species richness, ecological traits and community structure in the Rodnei Mountains National Park (Romania). PLoS ONE 10, e0145808.Google Scholar
Asta, J, Erhardt, W, Ferretti, M, Fornasier, F, Kirschbaum, U, Nimis, PL, Purvis, OW, Pirintsos, S, Scheidegger, C, Van Haluwyn, C, et al. (2002) Mapping lichen diversity as an indicator of environmental quality. In Nimis, PL, Scheidegger, C and Wolseley, PA (eds), Monitoring with Lichens – Monitoring Lichens. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 273–279.Google Scholar
Atienza, V and Segarra-Moragues, JG (2000) Preliminary Red List of the lichens of the Valencian Community (eastern Spain). Forest Snow and Landscape Research 75, 391–400.Google Scholar
Barkman, JJ (1958) Phytosociology and Ecology of Cryptogamic Epiphytes. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Berryman, S and McCune, B (2006) Epiphytic lichens along gradients in topography and stand structure in western Oregon, USA. Pacific Northwest Fungi 1, 1–38.Google Scholar
Blasco-Moreno, A, Pérez-Casany, M, Puig, P, Morante, M and Castells, E (2019) What does a zero mean? Understanding false, random and structural zeros in ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10, 949–959.Google Scholar
Brownsteina, NC, Louis, TA, O'Hagan, A and Pendergast, J (2019) The role of expert judgment in statistical inference and evidence-based decision-making. American Statistician 73(S1), 56–68.Google Scholar
Brunialti, G, Frati, L and Ravera, S (2015) Structural variables drive the distribution of the sensitive lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in Mediterranean old-growth forests. Ecological Indicators 53, 37–42.Google Scholar
Brunialti, G, Frati, L, Calderisi, M, Giorgolo, F, Bagella, S, Bertini, G, Chianucci, F, Fratini, R, Gottardini, E and Cutini, A (2020) Epiphytic lichen diversity and sustainable forest management criteria and indicators: a multivariate and modelling approach in coppice forests of Italy. Ecological Indicators 115, 106358.Google Scholar
Cieśliński, S, Czyżewska, K and Fabiszewski, J (2006) Red list of the lichens in Poland. In Mirek, Z, Zarzycki, K, Wojewoda, W and Szeląg, Z (eds), Red List of Plants and Fungi in Poland. Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, pp. 71–89.Google Scholar
Comité Européen de Normalization (2014) Ambient air - Biomonitoring with lichens - Assessing epiphytic lichen diversity. European Standard 16413. Brussels: CEN.Google Scholar
Cutini, A, Ferretti, M, Bertini, G, Brunialti, G, Bagella, S, Chianucci, F, Fabbio, G, Fratini, R, Riccioli, F, Caddeo, C, et al. (2021) Testing an expanded set of sustainable forest management indicators in Mediterranean coppice area. Ecological Indicators 130, 108040.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, A and Mueller, GM (2011) Applying IUCN red-listing criteria for assessing and reporting on the conservation status of fungal species. Fungal Ecology 4, 147–162.Google Scholar
Dufrene, M and Legendre, P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67, 345–366.Google Scholar
Ellis, CJ (2012) Lichen epiphyte diversity: a species, community and trait-based review. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 14, 131–152.Google Scholar
Ellis, CJ and Coppins, BJ (2006) Contrasting functional traits maintain lichen epiphyte diversity in response to climate and autogenic succession. Journal of Biogeography 33, 1643–1656.Google Scholar
Ellis, CJ and Coppins, BJ (2010) Integrating multiple landscape-scale drivers in the lichen epiphyte response: climatic setting, pollution regime and woodland spatial-temporal structure. Diversity and Distributions 16, 43–52.Google Scholar
Ellis, CJ, Coppins, BJ, Dawson, TP and Seaward, MRD (2007) Response of British lichens to climate change scenarios: trends and uncertainties in the projected impact for contrasting biogeographic groups. Biological Conservation 140, 217–235.Google Scholar
Ferretti, M (2009) Quality Assurance in ecological monitoring – towards a unifying perspective. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 11, 726–729.Google Scholar
Frati, L, Brunialti, G, Landi, S, Filigheddu, R and Bagella, S (2022) Exploring the biodiversity of key groups in coppice forests (Central Italy): the relationship among vascular plants, epiphytic lichens, and wood-decaying fungi. Plant Biosystems 156, 835–846.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, U, Hilton-Taylor, C, Mace, GM and Rodriguez, JP (2001) The application of IUCN Red List criteria at regional levels. Conservation Biology 15, 1206–1212.Google Scholar
Gheza, G, Di Nuzzo, L, Nimis, PL, Benesperi, R, Giordani, P, Vallese, C and Nascimbene, J (2021) Towards a Red List of the terricolous lichens of Italy. Plant Biosystems 156, 824–825.Google Scholar
Gnüchtel, A (2009) Rote Liste Flechten Sachsens, Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege. Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie. Dresda: Pillnitzer.Google Scholar
Kubiak, D and Osyczka, P (2020) Non-forested vs forest environments: the effect of habitat conditions on host tree parameters and the occurrence of associated epiphytic lichens. Fungal Ecology 47, 100957.Google Scholar
Lange, OL, Green, TGA and Ziegler, H (1988) Water status related photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination in species of the lichen genus Pseudocyphellaria with green or blue-green photobionts and in photosymbiodemes. Oecologia 75, 494–501.Google Scholar
Li, S, Liu, W-Y, Li, D-W, Song, L, Shi, X-M and Lu, H-Z (2015) Species richness and vertical stratification of epiphytic lichens in subtropical primary and secondary forests in southwest China. Fungal Ecology 17, 30–40.Google Scholar
Lisická, E, Lackovicová, A, Lisický, MJ and Guttová, A (2000) First lichen species in Natura 2000? British Lichen Society Bulletin 87, 35–42.Google Scholar
Lõhmus, P, Marmor, L, Jüriado, I, Suija, A, Oja, E, Degtjarenko, P and Randlane, T (2019) Red List of Estonian lichens: revision in 2019. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 56, 63–76.Google Scholar
Mace, GM, Collar, NJ, Gaston, KJ, Hilton-Taylor, C, Akcakaya, HR, Leader-Williams, N, Milner-Gulland, EJ and Stuart, SN (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conservation Biology 22, 1424–1442.Google Scholar
Martínez, I, Carreño, F, Escudero, A and Rubio, A (2006) Are threatened lichen species well-protected in Spain? Effectiveness of a protected areas network. Biological Conservation 133, 500–511.Google Scholar
McCune, B and Grace, JB (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. Gleneden Beach, Oregon: MjM Software.Google Scholar
Meinzer, FC and Goldstein, G (1996) Scaling up from leaves to whole plants and canopies for photosynthetic gas exchange. In Mulkey, SS, Chazdon, RL and Smith, AP (eds), Tropical Forest Plant Ecophysiology. New York: Chapman & Hall, pp. 114–138.Google Scholar
Nascimbene, J, Marini, L and Nimis, PL (2007) Influence of forest management on epiphytic lichens in a temperate beech forest of northern Italy. Forest Ecology and Management 247, 43–47.Google Scholar
Nascimbene, J, Nimis, PL and Ravera, S (2013) Evaluating the conservation status of epiphytic lichens of Italy: a red list. Plant Biosystems 147, 898–904.Google Scholar
Nimis, PL (2022) ITALIC: the information system on Italian lichens, version 7.0. Department of Biology, University of Trieste. [WWW document] URL https://dryades.units.it/italic [Accessed 1 September 2022].Google Scholar
Pišút, I, Guttová, A, Lackovièová, A and Lisická, E (2001) Red list of lichens of Slovakia (December 2001). In Baláž, D, Marhold, K and Urban, P (eds), Red List of Plants and Animals of Slovakia. Ochrana prírody, Suppl. 20, 23–30.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, ASL, Pilgrim, JD, Lamoreux, JF, Hoffmann, M and Brooks, TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, 71–76.Google Scholar
Rossi, G, Montagnani, C, Gargano, D, Peruzzi, L, Abeli, T, Ravera, S, Cogoni, A, Fenu, G, Magrini, S, Gennai, M, et al. (eds) (2013) Lista Rossa della Flora Italiana. 1. Policy species e altre specie minacciate. Rome: Comitato Italiano IUCN e Ministero dell'Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare.Google Scholar
RStudio Team (2020) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, Massachusetts. [WWW resource] URL http://www.rstudio.com/.Google Scholar
Rubio-Salcedo, M, Martínez, I, Carreño, F and Escudero, A (2013) Poor effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network protecting Mediterranean lichen species. Journal for Nature Conservation 21, 1–9.Google Scholar
Scheidegger, C and Goward, T (2002) Monitoring lichens for conservation: Red Lists and conservation action plans. In Nimis, PL, Scheidegger, C and Wolseley, PA (eds), Monitoring with Lichens – Monitoring Lichens. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 163–181.Google Scholar
Sérusiaux, E (1989) Liste Rouge des Macrolichens dans la Communauté Européenne. Liège: Centre de Recherches sur les Lichens.Google Scholar
Vicol, I and Mihăilescu, S (2022) A biogeographical study of red listed lichen species at temporal and spatial scales within protected and non-protected areas. Scientific Reports 12, 898.Google Scholar
Wiersma, Y, Duinker, PN, Haider, W, Hvenegaard, GT and Schmiegelow, FKA (2015) Introduction: relationships between protected areas and sustainable forest management: where are we heading? Conservation and Society 13, 1–12.Google Scholar
Frati and Brunialti supplementary material
Tables S1-S2
File
35.5 KB