Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-7wlv9 Total loading time: 0.33 Render date: 2022-05-23T04:27:37.175Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

DO CORPORATE TAXES HARM ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE? EXPLAINING DISTORTIONS IN R&D- AND EXPORT-INTENSIVE UK FIRMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

Ioannis Bournakis*
Affiliation:
Middlesex University
Sushanta Mallick*
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
*
Address correspondence to: Sushanta Mallick, School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK. e-mail: s.k.mallick@qmul.ac.uk; Ioannis Bournakis, Department of Economics, Middlesex University, London, Hendon, NW4 4BT, UK. e-mail: I.Bournakis@mdx.ac.uk
Address correspondence to: Sushanta Mallick, School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK. e-mail: s.k.mallick@qmul.ac.uk; Ioannis Bournakis, Department of Economics, Middlesex University, London, Hendon, NW4 4BT, UK. e-mail: I.Bournakis@mdx.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effects of corporate tax liability on firm-level total factor productivity (TFP) as the key driver of economic performance. This is a new dimension in the UK productivity puzzle that has not attracted attention so far. We use 6559 manufacturing firms over 2004–2011 to investigate whether higher levels of corporate tax affect the productivity catch-up process by reducing after-tax earnings that could alternatively be used for productivity-enhancing investment, particularly focusing on R&D- and export-intensive firms. Our key results are summarized as follows: first, higher levels of corporate taxation impact adversely on TFP and this finding is robust to different tax measures and insensitive to endogeneity bias; second, as R&D- and export-intensive firms tend to have relatively higher TFP growth, higher levels of tax liability as a share of earnings before interest and taxes decelerate TFP growth of these firms.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers of this journal for their very constructive comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. We are also thankful to David Kernohan and Dimitris Tsouknidis for their comments and discussions. We are solely responsible for any error that might yet remain.

References

Aghion, P., Fally, T. and Scarpetta, S. (2007) Credit constraints as a barrier to the entry and post-entry growth of firms. Economic Policy 22(52), 731779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998) Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. M., Brys, B., Heady, C., Johansson, Å., Schwellnus, C. and Vartia, L. (2011) Tax policy for economic recovery and growth. The Economic Journal 121(550), F59F80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aw, B. Y., Roberts, M. J. and Xu, D. Y. (2008). R&D investments, exporting, and the evolution of firm productivity. The American Economic Review 98(2), 451456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, A., Batten, S., Chiu, A., Franklin, J. and Sebastia-Barriel, M. (2014) The UK productivity puzzle. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Q2.Google Scholar
Bartelsman, E. J. and Doms, M. (2000) Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata. Journal of Economic Literature 38(3), 569594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. B. and Jensen, J. B. (1999) Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics 47(1), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. B. and Jones, C. I. (1996a) Comparing apples to oranges: Productivity convergence and measurement across industries and countries. The American Economic Review 86(5), 12161238.Google Scholar
Bernard, A. B. and Jones, C. I. (1996b) Productivity across industries and countries: Time series theory and evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics 78(1), 135146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, N., Schankerman, M. and Van Reenen, J. (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4), 13471393.Google Scholar
Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (2000) GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews 19(3), 321340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourlès, R., Cette, G., Lopez, J., Mairesse, J. and Nicoletti, G. (2013) Do product market regulations in upstream sectors curb productivity growth? Panel data evidence for OECD countries. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(5), 17501768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bournakis, I. and Mallick, S. (2018) TFP estimation at firm level: The fiscal aspect of productivity convergence in the UK. Economic Modelling 70, 579590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brekke, K. R., Garcia Pires, A. J., Schindler, D. and Schjelderup, G. (2014) Capital Taxation and Imperfect Competition: ACE vs. CBIT. NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper, no. 32.Google Scholar
Cameron, G. (2006) R&D and growth at the industry level. In: Finley, L. A. (ed.), Perspectives on Economic Growth, pp 137158. Hauppauge, New York: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
Cameron, G., Proudman, J. and Redding, S. (2005) Technological convergence, R&D, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review 49(3), 775807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespi, G., Criscuolo, C. and Haskel, J. (2008) Productivity, exporting, and the learning-by-exporting hypothesis: Direct evidence from UK firms. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D’économique 41(2), 619638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, J. B. and Gordon, R. H. (2007) Taxes and entrepreneurial risk-taking: Theory and evidence for the U.S. Journal of Public Economics 91(7-8), 14791505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J. and Schuh, S. (1996) Small business and job creation: Dissecting the myth and reassessing the facts. Small Business Economics 8(4), 297315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, M. P. and Griffith, R. (1999) The Taxation of Discrete Investment Choices. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Devereux, M. P. and Griffith, R. (2003) Evaluating tax policy for location decisions. International Tax and Public Finance 10(2), 107126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, M. P. and Loretz, S. (2011) Corporation Tax in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Centre for Business Taxation, Said Business School, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Disney, R., Haskel, J. and Heden, Y. (2003) Entry, exit and establishment survival in UK manufacturing. The Journal of Industrial Economics 51(1), 91112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djankov, S., Ganser, T., McLiesh, C., Ramalho, R. and Shleifer, A. (2010) The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2(3), 3164.Google Scholar
Fisman, R. and Svensson, J. (2007) Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. Journal of Development Economics 83(1), 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., McGowan, D., Sanz, I. and Sanz-Sanz, J. F. (2016) Corporate taxation and productivity catch-up: Evidence from European firms. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 120(2), 372399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodridge, P., Haskel, J. and Wallis, G. (2013) Can intangible investment explain the UK productivity puzzle? National Institute Economic Review 224(1), R48R58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenaway, D. and Kneller, R. (2004) Exporting and productivity in the United Kingdom. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20(3), 358371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenaway, D. and Yu, Z. (2004) Firm-level interactions between exporting and productivity: Industry-specific evidence. Review of World Economics 140(3), 376392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, R., Haskel, J. and Neely, A. (2006) Why is productivity so dispersed? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(4), 513525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, R., Redding, S. and Simpson, H. (2009) Technological catch-up and geographic proximity. Journal of Regional Science 49(4), 689720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, R., Redding, S. and Van Reenen, J. (2003) R&D and absorptive capacity: Theory and empirical evidence. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 105(1), 99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, R., Redding, S. and Van Reenen, J. (2004) Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 86(4), 883895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. and Van Reenen, J. (2000) How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy 29(4), 449469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. and Moffat, J. (2016) The UK productivity puzzle, 2008–2012: Evidence using plant-level estimates of total factor productivity. Oxford Economic Papers 69(3), 529549.Google Scholar
Higon, D. A. (2007) The impact of R&D spillovers on UK manufacturing TFP: A dynamic panel approach. Research Policy 36(7), 964979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, R. G. (1998) Capital-market imperfections and investment. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1), 193225.Google Scholar
Keuschnigg, C. and Ribi, E. (2013) Profit taxes and financing constraints. International Tax and Public Finance 20(5), 808826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A. (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies 70(2), 317341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallick, S. and Yang, Y. (2013) Productivity performance of export market entry and exit: Evidence from Indian firms. Review of International Economics 21(4), 809824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Máñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. and Vicente, Ó. (2014) Financial constraints and R&D and exporting strategies for Spanish manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 23(6), 15631594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, K. and Neely, A. (2006) Improving productivity—Opening the black box. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(4), 445456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, M. J. (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6), 16951725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olley, S. and Pakes, A. (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6), 12631297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oulton, N. (2001) Must the growth rate decline? Baumol’s unbalanced growth revisited. Oxford Economic Papers 53(4), 605627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, H. (1993) Asymmetric information, liquidity constraints, and Canadian investment. Canadian Journal of Economics 26(3), 552574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

DO CORPORATE TAXES HARM ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE? EXPLAINING DISTORTIONS IN R&D- AND EXPORT-INTENSIVE UK FIRMS
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

DO CORPORATE TAXES HARM ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE? EXPLAINING DISTORTIONS IN R&D- AND EXPORT-INTENSIVE UK FIRMS
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

DO CORPORATE TAXES HARM ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE? EXPLAINING DISTORTIONS IN R&D- AND EXPORT-INTENSIVE UK FIRMS
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *