Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa



Recent emphasis has been placed on exploring behavioral aspects of individual agents in explaining macroeconomic phenomena. Of particular interest is augmenting New Keynesian models to produce costly disinflation, as empirics and consensus suggest. We presume a fraction of agents using rule-of-thumb behavior in price setting in an otherwise standard New Keynesian model. Our findings suggest that relatively small amounts of rule-of-thumb behavior are required to offset the net effects of Ball's disinflationary boom. Moderate levels of rule-of-thumb behavior can produce delayed recessions consistent with some VAR evidence. However, high proportions of rule-of-thumb behavior are needed to produce immediate reductions in output following implementation.

Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Aaron L. Jackson, Department of Economics, Bentley College, 175 Forest St., Waltham, MA 02452-4705, USA; e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

AscariG. and N.Rankin 2002 Staggered wages and output dynamics under disinflation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26, 653680.

BaakS.J. 1999 Tests for bounded rationality with a linear dynamic model distorted by heterogeneous expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23, 15171543.

BallL. 1990 Credible Disinflation with Staggered Price Setting. NBER working paper 3555.

BallL. 1995 Disinflation with imperfect credibility. Journal of Monetary Economics 35, 523.

BallL. and D.Romer 1989 The equilibrium and optimal timing of price changes. Review of Economic Studies 56, 179198.

BranchW. 2004 The theory of rationally heterogeneous expectations: Evidence from survey data on inflation expectations. Economic Journal 114, 592621.

CarrollC. 2003 Macroeconomic expectations of households and professional forecasters. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 269298.

ChariV.V., P.Kehoe and E.McGrattan 2000 Sticky price models of the business cycle: Can the contract multiplier solve the persistence problem? Econometrica 68, 11511179.

EvansG. and S.Honkapohja 2001 Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

GaliJ. and M.Gertler 1999 Inflation dynamics: A structural econometric analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 44, 195222.

KingR. and A.Wolman 1996 Inflation Targeting in a St. Louis Model of the 21st Century. NBER working paper 5507.

KingR., C.Plosser, and S.Rebelo 1988 Production, growth, and business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics 21, 195232.

MankiwN.G. 2001 The inexorable and mysterious tradeoff between inflation and unemployment. Economic Journal 111, C45C61.

MankiwN.G. and R.Reis 2002 Sticky information versus sticky prices: A proposal to replace the New Keynesian Phillips curve. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 12951328.

SbordoneA. 2002 Prices and unit labor costs: A new test of price stickiness. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 265292.

WoodfordM. 1996 Control of the Public Debt: A Requirement for Price Stability? NBER working paper 5684.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Macroeconomic Dynamics
  • ISSN: 1365-1005
  • EISSN: 1469-8056
  • URL: /core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 93 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.