Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Díaz, Antonia and Franjo, Luis 2016. Capital goods, measured TFP and growth: The case of Spain. European Economic Review, Vol. 83, p. 19.

    Hidalgo Pérez, Manuel A. O׳Kean Alonso, José María and Rodríguez López, Jesús 2016. Labor demand and ICT adoption in Spain. Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 40, Issue. 5, p. 450.

    Schäfer, Andreas and Schneider, Maik T. 2015. ENDOGENOUS ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, NORTH–SOUTH TRADE, AND GROWTH. Macroeconomic Dynamics, Vol. 19, Issue. 05, p. 1074.

    Molinari, Benedetto Rodríguez, Jesús and Torres, José L. 2013. Growth and technological progress in selected Pacific countries. Japan and the World Economy, Vol. 28, p. 60.



  • Jesús Rodríguez-López (a1) and José L. Torres (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 04 October 2010

In this paper we use a dynamic general equilibrium growth model to quantify the contribution to productivity growth from different technological sources in the three leading economies of the world: Germany, Japan, and the United States. The sources of technology are classified into neutral progress and investment-specific progress. The latter can be split into two different types of equipment: information and communication technologies (ICT) and non-ICT equipment. We find that in the long run, neutral technological change is the main source of productivity growth in Germany and Japan. For the United States, the main source of productivity growth arises from investment-specific technological change, mainly associated with ICT. We also find that a non-negligible part of productivity growth in the three countries has been due to the technology specific to non-ICT equipment.

Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Jesús Rodríguez-López, Department of Economics, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Ctra Utrera, 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Basu , J. Fernald , N. Oulton , and S. Srinivasan (2003) The case of the missing productivity growth, or does information technology explain why productivity accelerated in the United States but not in the United Kingdom? NBER Macroeconomics Annual 18, 963.

A. Colecchia and P. Schreyer (2002) ICT investment and economic growth in the 1990's: Is the United States a unique case? A comparative study of nine OECD countries. Review of Economic Dynamics 5 (2), 408442.

J.G. Cummins and G.L. Violante (2002) Investment-specific technical change in the U.S. (1947–2000): Measurement and macroeconomic consequences. Review of Economic Dynamic 5, 243284.

T. Fueki and T. Kawamoto (2009) Does information technology raise Japan's productivity? Japan and the World Economy 21 (4), 325336.

D. Gollin (2002) Getting income shares right. Journal of Political Economy 110, 458474.

R. Gordon (1990) The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

M. Gort , J. Greenwood , and P. Rupert (1999) Measuring the rate of technological progress in structures. Review of Economic Dynamics 2 (1), 207230.

J. Greenwood and P. Krusell (2007) Growth accounting with investment-specific technological progress: A discussion of two approaches. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 13001310.

F. Hayashi and E. Prescott (2002) The 1990s in Japan: A lost decade. Review of Economic Dynamics 5, 206235.

Z. Hercowitz (1998) The ‘embodiment’ controversy: A review essay. Journal of Monetary Economics 41, 217224.

D. W. Jorgenson (1966) The embodiment hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy 74 (1), 117.

D. W. Jorgenson (2001) Information technology and the U.S. economy. American Economic Review 91, 132.

D. W. Jorgenson and K. Motohashi (2005) Information technology and the Japanese economy. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 19, 460481.

D. Martínez , J. Rodríguez , and J. L. Torres (2008) The productivity paradox and the new economy: The Spanish case. Journal of Macroeconomics 30 (4), 11691186.

E. Mendoza , A. Razin , and L. Tesar (1994) Effective tax rates in macroeconomics. Cross-country estimated of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 297323.

N. Oulton (2007) Investment-specific technological change and growth accounting. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 12901299.

P. Schreyer (2002) Computer price indices and international growth and productivity comparisons. Review of Income and Wealth 48 (1), 1531.

R. Solow (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 6594.

M. Timmer and B. van Ark (2005) Does information and communication technology drive EU–US productivity growth differentials? Oxford Economic Papers 57, 693716.

K. Whelan (2002) A guide to U.S. chain aggregated NIPA data. Review of Income and Wealth 48 (2), 217233.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Macroeconomic Dynamics
  • ISSN: 1365-1005
  • EISSN: 1469-8056
  • URL: /core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *