Skip to main content

Indigenous or Imported Knowledge in Brazilian Management Studies: A Quest for Legitimacy?

  • Suzana B. Rodrigues (a1), Roberto Gonzalez Duarte (a2) and Alexandre de Padua Carrieri (a2)

This article reflects upon the evolution of Brazilian management studies in light of the debate provoked by Management and Organization Review, 5(1), in a special edition on ‘The Future of Chinese Management Research’. Despite an impressive growth in publications, Brazilian management and organization studies have had litde conversation with mainstream international scholarship. The article offers some explanations as to why this might be so and suggests some alternatives for enhancing the international impact of Brazilian studies and advancing the country's reputation in the field. We suggest two routes through which Brazilian management studies could enhance international legitimacy: an outside-in approach, which draws upon established international contributions to theory to inform the investigation, but uses the Brazilian context to enlighten these same theories, and an inside-out approach that draws upon indigenous questions and research design to develop a theory relevant to the Brazilian context, which ultimately contributes to the enhancement of existing or to the creation of new theories. In addition, this article suggests that ambidextrous policies provide a better fit for research strategies intended to foster both approaches.

Hide All
Abramovay R., & Favarcto A. 2009. As cstruturas sociais do desenvolvimcnto territorial - uma analisc da regiao do Cariri paraibano (Brasil). FIPE-Rimisp. 117.
Adams J., & King C. 2009. Global research report: Brazil research and collaboration in the new geography of science. Leeds: Thomson Reuters.
Alon I., Child J., Li S., & Mclntyrc J. R. 2011. Globalization of Chinese firms: Theoretical universalism or particularism. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 191200.
Argyris C. 1976. Theories of action that inhibit individual learning. American Psychologist, 31(9): 633654.
Astley W. G. 1985. Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4): 497513.
Barney J. B., & Zhang S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 1528.
Becker J. L., & Guerrciro R. 2010. Relatório de Avaliação 2007-2009-Trienal 2010. Brasilia: Capes/MEC.
Bertcro C. O., & Keincrt T. M. M. 1994. A evolução da analise organizational no Brasil (1961-93). Revista de Administração de Empresas, 34(3): 8190.
Boisot M. 1995. Information space: A framework for learning in organizations, institutions and culture. London: Routledge.
Bourdicu P. 1988. Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
CAPES. 2009. Caderno de Indicadores. [Last accessed 10 October 2010.] Available from URL:
Cassiolato J. E., Lastrcs H. M. M., & Maciel M. L. 2003. Systems of innovation and development: Evidence from Brazil. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Cheng B. S., Wang A. C., & Huang M. P. 2009. The road more popular versus the road less travelled: An ‘insider's’ perspective ofadvancing Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 91105.
Child J. 2009. Context, comparison and methodology in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 5773.
Child J., & Rodrigues S. B. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 381410.
Clegg S. R., & Hardy C. 1996. Representations. In Clegg S. R., Hardy C. & Nord W. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies: 676-708. London: Sage.
Clegg S. R., & Hardy C. 2006. Representation and reflcxivity. In Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B. & Nord W. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies: 425-443. London: Sage.
CREST OMC Working Group. 2008. Internationalization of R&D - Facing the challenge of globalization: Approaches to a proactive international policy in S&T. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Brussels: 126.
Cruz C. H. B., & Chaimovich H. 2010. Brazil. In UNESCO (Ed.), UNESCO Science Report: The current status of science around the world: 103-121. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Cuervo-Cazurra A. 2008. The internationalization of developing country MNEs: The case of multilatinas. Journal of International Management, 14(2): 138154.
Da Silva J. F., Da Rocha A., & Carneiro J. 2009. The international expansion of firms from emerging markets: Toward a typology of Brazilian MNEs. Latin American Business Review, 10: 95115.
DeNisi A. S. 2010. Challenges and opportunities for the academy in the next decade. The Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 190201.
Eisenhardt K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532550.
Fachin R. C. 2006. Construindo uma associação cientifica: trinta anos da Anpad—memorias, registros, desafios. Rio de Janeiro: Anpad.
Fleury A., & Fleury M. T. 2011. Brazilian multinationals: Competences for internationalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fligstein N., & McAdam D. 2011. Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1): 126.
Flyvbjerg B. 2006. Making organization research matter: Power, values and phronesis. In Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B. & Nord W. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies: 370-387. London: Sage.
Glaser B. C., & Strauss A. L. 1967. Discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Goldstein A., & Pusterla F. 2010. Emerging economies multinationals: General features and specificities of the Brazilian and Chinese cases. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 5(3/4): 289306.
Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481510.
Greenwood R., Suddaby R., & Hinings C. R. 2002. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 5880.
Hall P. A., & Soskice D. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kotabe M., Dunlap-Hinkler D., Parentc R., & Mishra H. A. 2007. Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2): 259282.
Krug B., & Hendrischke H. 2008. Framing China: Transformation and institutional change through co-evolution. Management and Organization Review, 4(1): 81108.
Lahiri S. 2011. Brazil — focused publications in leading business journals. European Business Review, 23(1): 2344.
Lazzarini S. G., Miller G. J., & Zenger T. R. 2008. Dealing with the paradox of embeddedness: The role of contracts and trust in facilitating movement out of committed relationships. Organization Science, 19(5): 709728.
Leung K. 2009. Never the twain shall meet? Integrating Chinese and western management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 121129.
Lin N. 2011. Capitalism in China: A centrally managed capitalism (CMC) and its future. Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 6396.
Lu J., Liu X., & Wang H. 2011. Motives for outward FDI of Chinese private firms: Firm resources, industry dynamics, and government policies. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 223248.
Machado-da-Silva C. L., Cunha V. C., & Ambon N. 1990. Organizações: O estado da arte da produção acadêmica no Brasil. Paper presented at the 14° Encontro Anual da ANPAD. Rio de Janeiro, Setcmber 1990.
Machado-da-Silva C. L., Guarido Filho E. R., Rossoni L., & Graeff J. F. 2008. Periódicos brasileiros de administração: Análise bibliométrica de impacto no triênio 2005-2007. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 2(3): 351373.
March J. G. 2005. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management and Organization Review, 1(1): 522.
Mayo E. 1949. Hawthorne and the Western Electric Company, the social problems of an industrial civilization. Oxford: Routledge.
Menard-Warwick J. 2005. Both a fiction and an existential fact: Theorizing identity in second language acquisition and literacy studies. Linguistics and Education, 16(3): 253274.
Mom T. J. M., van den Bosch F. A. J., & Volberda H. W. 2009. Understanding variation in managers' ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4): 812828.
Monteiro L. F., Arvidsson N., & Birkinshaw J. 2008. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary ssolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19(1): 90107.
O'Reilly C. A., & Tushman M. L. 2004. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(April): 19.
Pcrez-Batres L. A., & Eden L. 2008. Is there a liability of localncss? How emerging market firms respond to regulatory punctuations. Journal of International Management, 14(3): 232251.
Pettigrew A. M. 1987. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6): 649670.
Pettigrew A. M. 2001. Management research after modernism. British Journal of Management, 12(Suppl s1): S61S70.
Ramamurti R., & Singh J. V. 2009. Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reed M. 2006. Organizational theorizing: A historically contested terrain. In Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B. & Nord W. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies: 19-54. London: Sage.
Ribciro D. 2009. Estruturas Organizacionais: Um possivel delineamento da produção cientifica nacional sobre o tema no período 1998-2008. Paper presented at the 33° Encontro Anual da ANPAD. Rio de Janeiro, September, ENANPAD, 2009.
Rodrigues S. B., & Barros B. 2002. Management in Brazil. In Warner M. (Ed.), The international encyclopaedia of business and management (2nd ed.): 528540. London: Thompson Learning.
Rodrigues S. B., & Carrieri A. P. 2001. A tradição anglo-saxonica nos estudos organizacionais brasileiros. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Edição Especial, 5(Sep): 81102.
Rossoni L., & Guarido Filho E. R. 2009. Cooperação entre programas de pós-graduação em Administração no Brasil: Evidências estruturais em quatro areas temáticas. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 13(3): 366390.
Selznick P. 1949. TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. New York: Harper and Row.
Suddaby R., & Greenwood R. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1): 3567.
The Economist. 2011. Go south, young scientist. January 6: 3637.
Tinoco T. 2005. A Produção Científica de Administração no Brazil, 1997-2002: Uma Perspectiva Bibliométrica. Unpublished master dissertation, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, São Paulo.
Tsang E. W. K. 2009. Chinese management research at a crossroads: Some philosophical considerations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 131143.
Tsui A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 113.
Tsui A. S. 2009. Editor's introduction - Autonomy of inquiry: Shaping the future of emerging scientific communities. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 114.
UNESCO. 2010. Unesco science report: The current status of science around the world. Paris: Unesco Publishing.
Vergara S. C., & Carvalho J. R. 1995. Nacionalidade dos autores referenciados na literatura brasileira sobre organizações. Revista Brasileira de Administração Contemporânea, 1(6): 169188.
Whitley R. 2003. Competition and pluralism in the public sciences: The impact of institutional frameworks on the organisation of academic science. Research Policy, 32(6): 10151029.
Whitley R. 2010. Reconfiguring the public sciences: The impact of governance changes on authority and innovation in public sciences. In Whitley R., Glaser J. & Engwall L. (Eds.), Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relations in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation: 3-50. Oxford: Oxford University Press, The Public Sciences.
Yin R. K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Management and Organization Review
  • ISSN: 1740-8776
  • EISSN: 1740-8784
  • URL: /core/journals/management-and-organization-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 129 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.