Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Technological Capability, Marketing Capability, and Firm Performance in Turbulent Conditions

  • Zhongfeng Su (a1), Jisheng Peng (a1), Hao Shen (a2) and Ting Xiao (a3)
Abstract

The manner in which technological capability and marketing capability can be successfully leveraged is an important research issue. Based on the resource-management model, this study aims to answer two research questions: (1) whether technological capability and marketing capability are complementary or supplementary capabilities; and (2) how technological capability and marketing capability can be used appropriately to respond to environmental turbulence. Based on a face-to-face interview survey of 212 Chinese firms, we find that technological capability and marketing capability have synergistic effects. We also find that technological turbulence enhances the performance effect of technological capability, but impedes that of marketing capability; whereas market turbulence advances the performance effect of marketing capability, but impedes that of technological capability. Thus, the appropriate way to leverage technological capability and marketing capability is to integrate them and to deploy technological capability to respond to technological turbulence and marketing capability to respond to market turbulence.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Acquaah, M. 2007. Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12): 12351255.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Anderson, C. R., & Zeithami, C. P. 1984. Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1): 524.
Anderson, J. C, & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411423.
Armstrong, S. J., & Overton, T. 1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3): 396402.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantagc. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99120.
Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. 2001. The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In Hitt, M. A. Freeman, R. E. & Harrison, J. S. (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management: 124188. Oxford: Blackwell.
Calantone, R., Garcia, R., & Dröge, C. 2003. The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2): 90103.
Chen, M. 2001. Inside Chinese business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128152.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 7587.
Cronbach, L. J. 1971. Test validation. In Thorndike, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.): 443507. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Day, G. S. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4): 3752.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 3950.
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strateg formulation. California Management Review, 33(3): 114135.
Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. 1998. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(10): 3045.
Hatcher, L. 1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS(R) system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Helfat, C. E. 2000. Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capacities. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 955959.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences . Journal of Marketing, 57(3): 5370.
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2): 118.
Krasnikov, A., & Jayachandran, S. 2008. The relative impact of marketing, research-and- development, and operations capabilities on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72(4): 111.
Lambkin, M., & Day, G. S. 1989. Evolutionary processes in competitive markets: Beyond the product life cycle. Journal of Marketing, 53(3): 420.
Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Chan, T. S. 2005. Entrepreneurial strategy making and performance in China's new technology ventures: The contingency effect of environments and firm competences. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16(1): 3757.
Li, J., Chen, D., & Shapiro, D. M. 2010. Product innovations in emerging economies: The role of foreign knowledge access channels and internal efforts in Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(2): 243266.
Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. 2008. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4): 383400.
Li, Y., Lee, S. H., Li, X., & Liu, Y. 2010. Knowledge codification, exploitation, and innovation: The moderating influence of organizational controls in Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(2): 219241.
Lichtenstein, B. M. B., & Brush, C. G. 2001. How do ‘resource bundles’ develop and change in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3): 3758.
Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Howell, R. 1996. The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intra-organizational relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4): 299314.
Moorman, C., & Slotegraaf, R. J. 1999. The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2): 239257.
Neter, J., William, W., & Kutner, M. H. 1985. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design. Homewood, IL: Richard Irwin.
Noda, T., & Collis, D. J. 2001. The evolution of intra-industry firm heterogeneity: Insights from a process study. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 897925.
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275296.
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 486501.
Peng, M. W., Zhou, Y., & York, A. S. 2006. Behind make or buy decisions in export strategy: A replication and extension of Trabold. Journal of World Business, 41(3): 289300.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.
Pfeffer, J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4): 599620.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 2240.
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8): 729753.
Shrout, P., & Fleiss, J. L. 1979. Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2): 420428.
Sirmon, D. G., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. 2008. Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: The effects of resource bundling and deployment. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (5): 918935.
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4): 339358.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 273292.
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1994. Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 4655.
Smart, C., & Vertinsky, I. 1986. Strategy and the environment: A study of corporate responses to crises. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3): 199213.
Song, M., DiBenedetto, A., & Nason, R. W. 2007. Capabilities and financial performance: The moderating effect of strategic type. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1): 1834.
Song, M., Dröge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. 2005. Marketing and technology' resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3): 259276.
Su, B. F., Xie, E., & Li, Y. 2009. Organizational slack and firm performance during institutional transitions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1): 7591.
Tsang, E. W. K., & Kwan, K. 1999. Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 759780.
Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. 2005. Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1): 8094.
Wang, D., Su, Z. F., & Yang, D. 2011. Organizational culture and knowledge creation capability. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3): 363373.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171180.
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 133.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185203.
Zhou, K. Z. 2006. Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3): 394402.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Management and Organization Review
  • ISSN: 1740-8776
  • EISSN: 1740-8784
  • URL: /core/journals/management-and-organization-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed