Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview

  • François Diaz-Maurin (a1) (a2) and Rodney C. Ewing (a1) (a3)

Abstract

Recent efforts have been made toward the integration of the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the United States. The back-end integration seeks to address several management challenges: 1) current storage practices are not optimized for transport and disposal; 2) the impact of interim storage on the disposal strategy needs to be evaluated; and 3) the back-end is affected by—and affects—nuclear fuel cycle and energy policy choices. The back-end integration accounts for the various processes of nuclear waste management—onsite storage, consolidated storage, transport and geological disposal. Ideally, these processes should be fully coupled so that benefits and impacts can be assessed at the level of the full fuel cycle. The paper summarizes the causes and consequences of the absence of integration at the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S., critically reviews ongoing integration efforts, and suggests a framework that would support the back-end integration.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
1.U.S. NWTRB, Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy (United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Arlington, VA, 2009).
2.Carter, J., Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste Inventory Report (Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, South Carolina, USA, 2018).
3.Rechard, R.P., Price, L.L., and Kalinina, E.A., Integrating Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from Generation to Disposal (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2015), p. 45.
4.U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (2019).
5.Bonano, E.J., Kalinina, E.A., and Swift, P.N., MRS Advances 3, 991 (2018).
6.Bruno, J., Duro, L., and Diaz-Maurin, F., in Advances in Nuclear Fuel Chemistry 1st Edition edited Piro, byM. (Woodhead Publishing, 2020), p. 450.
7.Ewing, R.C. and Weber, W.J., in Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability edited by Ginley, D.S. and Cahen, D. (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 178193.
8.Diaz-Maurin, F., Sun, H.C., Yu, J., and Ewing, R.C., MRS Advances 4, 959 (2019).
9.Diaz-Maurin, F. and Ewing, R.C., Sustainability 10, 4390 (2018).
10.Reset Steering Committee, Reset of America’s Nuclear Waste Management Strategy and Policy (Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2018).
11.Johnson, C.A., Radioactive Waste Management: A Bibliography for the Integrated Data Base Program (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA), 1981).
12.U.S. Department of Energy, Integrated Data Base Report-1996: U.S. Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste Inventories, Projections, and Characteristics (Washington, D.C., 1997), p. 263.
13.Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, Report to the Secretary of Energy (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2012).
14.U.S. Department of Energy, Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., 2013), p. 14.
15.Danker, W.J. and Williams, J.R., in High Level Radioactive Waste Management (American Nuclear Society, Las Vegas, NV (USA), 1990).
16.Jarrell, J., in (U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Washington, D.C., 2016), p. 29.
17.Joseph, R., Craig, B., Cumberland, R.M., Trail, C., Aubin, J. St., Olson, C., Vander Wal, L., Vanderzee, E., Jarrell, J., and Kalinina, E., in (Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States), Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 2019).
18.Abkowitz, M. and Bickford, E., in (American Nuclear Society, Charleston, SC, USA, 2015).
19.U.S. Department of Energy’s Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project, Small Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal (STAD) Canister System For Spent Nuclear Fuel Management (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2015), p. 2.
20.Howard, R., in (U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Washington, D.C., 2013), p. 20.
21.U.S. Department of Energy, Designing a Consent-Based Siting Process: Summary of Public Input (Washington, D.C., 2016), p. 98.
22.Dewoghélaëre, J., Hériard-Dubreuil, G., and Marignac, Y., Civil Society Views on the Content and Governance of a Joint Research Programme (JOPRAD - Towards a Joint Programming on Radioactive Waste Disposal. (EU project H2020-Euratom-653951), Paris, France, 2017), p. 11.
23.Brunnengräber, A. and Di Nucci, M.R., editors, Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance: An International Comparison (Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2019).
24.Solomon, B.D., Andrén, M., and Strandberg, U., Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1, 13 (2010).
25.Kliskey, A., Alessa, L., Wandersee, S., Williams, P., Trammell, J., Powell, J., Grunblatt, J., and Wipfli, M., Sustain Sci 12, 293 (2017).
26.Mayumi, K. and Giampietro, M., Ecological Indicators 47, 50 (2014).
27.Giampietro, M., Aspinall, R.J., Ramos-Martin, J., and Bukkens, S.G.F., editors, Resource Accounting for Sustainability Assessment: The Nexus between Energy, Food, Water and Land Use (Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2014).
28.Diaz-Maurin, F. and Giampietro, M., Energy 49, 162 (2013).
29.La Porte, T.R. and Metlay, D.S., Public Administration Review 56, 341 (1996).
30.Robinson, S.E., Stoutenborough, J.W., and Vedlitz, A., Understanding Trust in Government: Environmental Sustainability, Fracking, and Public Opinion in American Politics (Routledge, New York, NY, 2017).
31.Greenberg, M., Nuclear Waste Management, Nuclear Power, and Energy Choices: Public Preferences, Perceptions, and Trust (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
32.Slovic, P., Flynn, J.H., and Layman, M., Science 254, 1603 (1991).
33.Diaz-Maurin, F., Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74, 335 (2018).
34.Porter, T.M., Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1995).
35.Chifari, R., Lo Piano, S., Bukkens, S.G.F., and Giampietro, M., Ecological Indicators (2016).
36.Davis, L.E., Knopman, D., Greenberg, M.D., Miller, L.E., and Doll, A., Choosing a New Organization for Management and Disposition of Commercial and Defense High-Level Radioactive Materials (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2012).
37.Flynn, J., Kasperson, R., Kunreuther, H., and Slovic, P., Issues in Science and Technology 8, 42 (1992).

Keywords

Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview

  • François Diaz-Maurin (a1) (a2) and Rodney C. Ewing (a1) (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed