Skip to main content Accessibility help

Comparing Biocompatibility of Nanocrystalline Titanium and Titanium-Oxide with Microcrystalline Titanium

  • Raheleh Miralami (a1), Laura Koepsell (a1), Thyagaseely Premaraj (a2), Bongok Kim (a3), Geoffrey M. Thiele (a4), J. Graham Sharp (a5), Kevin L. Garvin (a1) and Fereydoon Namavar (a1)...

Titanium (Ti) is the material of choice for orthopaedic applications because it is biocompatible and encourages osteoblast ingrowth. It was shown that the biocompatibility of Ti metal is due to the presence of a thin native sub-stoichiometric titanium oxide layer which enhances the adsorption of mediating proteins on the surface [1]. The present studies were devised to evaluate the adhesion, survival, and growth of cells on the surface of new engineered nano-crystal films of titanium and titanium oxides and compare them with orthopaedic-grade titanium with microcrystals. The engineered nano-crystal films with hydrophilic properties are produced by employing an ion beam assisted deposition (IBAD) technique. IBAD combines physical vapor deposition with concurrent ion beam bombardment in a high vacuum environment to produce films (with 3 to 70 nm grain size) with superior properties. These films are “stitched” to the artificial orthopaedic implant materials with characteristics that affect the wettability and mechanical properties of the coatings.

To characterize the biocompatibility of these nano-engineered surfaces, we have studied osteoblast function including cell adhesion, growth, and differentiation on different nanostructured samples. Cell responses to surfaces were examined using SAOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. We also studied a correlation between the surface nanostructures and the cell growth by characterizing the SAOS-2 cells with immunofluorescence and measuring the amount alizarin red concentration produced after 7 and 14 days. The number of adherent cells was determined by means of nuclei quantification on the nanocrystalline Ti, TiO2, and microcrystalline Ti and analysis was performed with Image J. Our experimental results indicated that nanocrystalline TiO2 is superior to both nano and microcrystalline Ti in supporting growth, adhesion, and proliferation. Improving the quality of surface oxide, i.e. fabricating stoichiometric oxides as well as nanoengineering the surface topology, is crucial for increasing the biocompatibility of Ti implant materials.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding Author
Hide All
1. Namavar, F., Sabirianov, R., et al. , presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, Feb 2012 (unpublished).
2. Lord, M., Foss, M., Besenbacher, F., Nano Today 5, 6678 (2010).
3. Webster, T.J., Ergun, C., et al. , J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 67(3), 975–80 (2003).
4. Svehla, M., Morberg, P., Bruce, W., Zicat, B., et al. , J. Arthroplasty 17(3), 304–11 (2002).
5. Klokkevold, P.R., Johnson, P., Dadgostari, S., et al. , Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 12, (4), 350 (2001).
6. Brunette, D.M., Chehroudi, B., J. Biomech. Eng. 121(1), 4957(1999).
7. Namavar, F., Cheung, C.L., Sabirianov, R.F., et al. , NanoLetters 8 (4) 988 (2008).
8. Kalbacova, M., Rezek, B., Baresova, V., et al. , Acta Biomater. 5(8) 3076–85 (2009).
9. Kim, J.B., Leucht, P., Luppen, C.A., et al. , Bone 41(1) 3951 (2007).
10. Jager, M., et al. , J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 8, 69036 (2007).
11. Stevens, M.M., George, J.H., Science 310 (5751) 1135–8 (2005).
12. Le Guehennec, L., Lopez-Heredia, M.A., Enkel, B., et al. , Acta Biomater. 4(3) 535–43 (2008).
13. Francois, P., Vaudaux, P., Taborelli, M., et al. , Clin. Oral Implants Res. 8(3) 217–25 (1997).
14. Wu, Y., Zitelli, J.P., TenHuisen, K.S., Yu, X., Libera, M.R., Biomaterials. 32(4) 951–60 (2011).
15. Boyan, B.D., Boneweld, L.F., Paschalis, E.P., et al. , Calcif. Tissue Int. 71(6) 519–29 (2002).
16. Babchanko, O., Kromka, A., et al. , Physica. Status Solidi A 206(9) 2033–7 (2009).
17. Sasmazel, H.T., Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 49, 838846 (2011).
18. Mendonca, G., Mendonca, D.B., Aragao, F.J., et al. , Biomaterials 29(28) 38223835 (2008).
19. Namavar, F., Sabirianov, R.F., et al. in Engineered Nanostructured Coatings for Enhanced Protein Adsorption and Cell Growth (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1418, Boston, MA 2011).
20. Sabirianov, R.F., Rubinstein, A., Namavar, F., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 (14) 6597 (2011).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL)
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1946-4274
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed