Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Direct Cell Printing With Microfabricated Quill-Pen Cantilevers

  • William F. Hynes (a1), Alison Gracias (a2), Nicholas M. Fahrenkopf (a3), Nurazhani Abdul Raof (a4), Waseem K. Raja (a5), Katherine Lee (a6), Yubing Xie (a7), Magnus Bergkvist (a8) and Nathaniel C. Cady (a9)...
Abstract

A novel direct cell printing technique has been developed to control and manipulate the position of cells on solid surfaces. The method utilizes microfabricated polymeric “quill-pen” cantilevers to transfer living cells onto a wide variety of surfaces. In contrast with existing cell deposition methods, such as ink jet or laser ablation methods, the quill-pen approach imparts minimal thermal and shear stress to cells, preserving cell viability and biological functionality. Deposition of both bacterial and mammalian cells into defined patterns has been demonstrated using this method. The size of printed, cell-containing droplets could be controlled by varying the geometry of the quill-pen stylus and by varying printing conditions such as contact time, relative humidity, and surface hydrophobicity. Initial experiments using 10 μm diameter polymer beads demonstrated that the number of beads per droplet could be controlled by varying spot size and particle concentration in the printing solution. Spots could be printed ranging from 20 μm and 100 μm in diameter with approximate volumes ranging from 1-250 pL. We demonstrated deposition of both cells and beads onto a variety of solid surfaces including agarose gel, polystyrene, polyethylene, and glass. Printed cells have also been immobilized on glass and polymer surfaces using biocompatible hydrogel materials (both alginic acid and hyaluronic acid-based matrices) as well as poly-L-lysine. Similar to polymer beads, the number of cells in printed droplets was shown to be dependent upon the size of the droplet, and could be varied by adjusting the concentration of cells present in the printing fluid. As few as one cell per spot could be achieved by adjusting these parameters. The viability and proliferation of printed cells has been evaluated using live optical imaging to observe cell growth and division. Both bacterial cells (Escherichia coli) and mammalian cells were able to divide and proliferate for at least 96 hr post-printing (experiments were discontinued after 96 hr). Live/dead staining was also used to confirm the viability of printed cells. Rat mammary adenocarcinoma MTLn3 cells and mouse embryonic stem cells were also shown to survive the printing process for at least 24 - 96 hr post-printing. These results demonstrate the feasibility of the printing method and its compatibility with a wide range of cell types. It is especially noteworthy that embryonic stem cells could survive the printing process (and proliferate on the printing substrate). This novel printing method has applications for tissue engineering, cell-to-cell signaling studies, and for directly interfacing cells with nanodevices and biosensors.

Copyright
References
Hide All
1Xu, T., Jin, J., Gregory, C., Hickman, J.J., and Boland, T., Biomaterials 26, 9399. (2005).
2Akselrod, G.M., Timp, W., Mirsaidov, U., Zhao, Q., Li, C., Timp, R., Timp, K., Matsudaira, P., and Timp, G., Biophys. J. 91, 34653473. (2006).
3Ringeisen, B.R., Kim, H., Barron, J.A., Krizman, D.B., Chrisey, D.B., Jackman, S., Auyeung, R.Y., and Spargo, B.J., Tissue Eng 10, 483–91. (2004).
4Gracias, A., Feng, X., Xu, B., and Castracane, J., Journal of Microlithography, Microfabrication, and Microsystems 5, 021102. (2006).
5Condeelis, J.S., Wyckoff, J., and Segall, J.E., European Journal of Cancer 36, 16711680. (2000).
6Robertson, E., Bradley, A., Kuehn, M., and Evans, M., Nature 323, 445–8. (1986).
7Keller, G., Kennedy, M., Papayannopoulou, T., and Wiles, M.V., Mol Cell Biol 13, 473–86. (1993).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL)
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1946-4274
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 89 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.