Skip to main content
×
Home

Knowledge Diversity in the Emerging Global Bio-Nano Sector

  • Elicia Maine (a1), Martin Bliemel (a2), Armstrong Murira (a3) and James Utterback (a4)
Astract
ASTRACT

As scientists are able to understand and manipulate ever smaller scales of matter, research in the fields of biotechnology and nanotechnology has converged to enable such radical innovations as lab-on-a-chip devices, targeted drug delivery, and other forms of minimally invasive therapy and diagnostics. This paper provides a descriptive overview of the emerging bio-nano sector, identifying what types of firms are entering, from what knowledge base, where they are located, and their strategic choices in terms of technological diversity and R&D strategy. The firms engaged in bio-nano research and development span the range from start-up firm to multinational pharmaceutical, biotech, chemical, and electronics firms: two thirds of bio-nano firms are relatively young and relatively small. The United States dominates this sector, with more than half of all bio-nano firms located in the USA. Even within this sector which epitomizes the convergence of technology, there is a broad range of technological diversity, with the most diverse firms overall coming from a base in electronics, the most diverse start-up firms coming from a base in nanomaterials, and the most narrowly focused firms coming from a biotechnology/pharmaceutical base. We find that hybridization has been the dominant knowledge diversity strategy, with 93% of the bio-nano firms with nano-patents holding multiclass patents.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Avenel E., Favier A., Ma S., Mangematin V., Rieu C., (2007). “Diversification and Hybridization in Firm Knowledge Bases in Nanotechnologies,” Research Policy, 36(6), 864870.
Chiaroni D., Chiesa V., De Massis A., and Frattini F., (2008). “The knowledge-bridging role of Technical and Scientific Services in knowledge-intensive industries,” International Journal of Technology Management, 41(3/4), 249272.
Huang Y-F., and Chen C-J., (2010). “The impact of Technological Diversity and Organizational Slack on Innovation,” Technovation, 30(7/8), 420428.
Lux Research, (2008). The Nanotech Report: 5th Edition.
Lysaght M. and Hazlehurst S. (2004) “Tissue Engineering: The End of the BeginningTissue Engineering, 10(1/2), 309319.
Research Plunkett, (2008). Plunkett’s Nanotechnology and MEMS Industry Almanac.
Rafols I., (2007). “Strategies for knowledge acquisition in bionanotechnology: Why are interdisciplinary practices less widespread than expected?Innovation, 20(4), 395412.
Rothaermel F., Thursby M., (2007). “The Nanotech versus the Biotech Revolution: Sources of Productivity in Incumbent Firm Research,” Research Policy, 36(6), 832849.
Suzuki J., and Kodama F., (2004). ““Technological Diversity of Persistent Innovators in Japan: Two Case Studies of Large Japanese Firms,” Research Policy, 33(3), 531549.
UK Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills, (2007). 2007 R&D Scoreboard.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL)
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1946-4274
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 79 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.