Skip to main content

Poroelastic Indentation Analysis for Hydrated Biological Tissues

  • Michelle L. Oyen (a1), Amanpreet K. Bembey (a2) and Andrew J. Bushby (a3)

Indentation techniques are employed for the measurement of mechanical properties of a wide range of materials. In particular, techniques focused at small length-scales, such as nanoindentation and AFM indentation, allow for local characterization of material properties in heterogeneous materials including natural tissues and biomimetic materials. Typical elastic analysis for spherical indentation is applicable in the absence of time-dependent deformation, but is inappropriate for materials with time-dependent responses. Recent analyses for the viscoelastic indentation problem, based on elastic-viscoelastic correspondence, have begun to address the issue of time-dependent deformation during an indentation test. The viscoelastic analysis has been shown to fit experimental indentation data well, and has been demonstrated as useful for characterization of viscoelasticity in polymeric materials and in hydrated mineralized tissues. However, a viscoelastic analysis is not necessarily sufficient for multi-phase materials with fluid flow. In the current work, a poroelastic analysis—based on fluid motion through a porous elastic network—is used to examine spherical indentation creep responses of hydrated biological materials. Both analytical and finite element approaches are considered for the poroelastic Hertzian indentation problem. Modeling results are compared with experimental data from nanoindentation of hydrated bone immersed in water and polar solvents (ethanol, methanol, acetone). Baseline (water-immersed) bone responses are characterized using the poroelastic model and numerical results are compared with altered hydration states due to polar solvents.

Hide All
1. Field, J S and Swain, M V, J. Mater. Res. 8, 297306 (1993).
2. Oliver, W C and Pharr, G M, J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564–83 (1992).
3. Lee, E H and Radok, J R M, Contact problem for viscoelastic bodies, J. Applied Mech. 27, 438–44 (1960).
4. Johnson, K L, Contact Mechanics. UK: Cambridge University Press, (1985).
5. Oyen, M L, Phil. Mag. 86, 56255641 (2006).
6. Oyen, M L, J. Mater. Res. 20, 20942100 (2005).
7. Cuy, J L, Mann, A B, Livi, K J, Teaford, M F, and Weihs, T P, Arch. Oral. Biol., 47, 281–91 (2002).
8. Oyen, M L and Ko, C-C, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 18, 623–8 (2007).
9. Bembey, A K, Oyen, M L, Bushby, A J, Boyde, A, Phil. Mag. 86, 56915703 (2006).
10. Bembey, A K, Bushby, A J, Boyde, A, Ferguson, V L, Oyen, M L, J. Mater. Res. 21, 1962–8 (2006).
11. Mattice, J M, Lau, A G, Oyen, M L, Kent, R W, J. Mater. Res. 21, 2003–10 (2006).
12. Cowin, S C, J. Biomech. 32, 217–38 (1999).
13. Agbezuge, L K and Deresiewicz, H, Israel J. of Tech. 12, 322–38 (1974).
14. Selvadurai, A P S, Int. J. Solids Structures 41, 2043–64 (2004).
15. Zysset, P K, Guo, X E, Hoffler, C E, Moore, K E, Goldstein, S A, J. Biomech. 32, 1005–12 (1999).
16. Lakes, R S, J. Materials Science, 26, 22872292 (1991).
17. Vollrath, F, Rev. Molec. Biotech. 74, 6783 (2000).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL)
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1946-4274
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 77 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.