Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T19:49:46.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time-Resolved Spectroscopy of InGaN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Milan Pophristic
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Rutgers University 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087
Frederick H. Long*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Rutgers University 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087
Chuong Tran
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 394 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
Ian T. Ferguson
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 394 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
*
Correspondence should be addressed to F.H. Long E-mail address: fhlong@rutchem.rutgers.edu
Get access

Abstract

We have used time-resolved photoluminescence (PL), with 400 nm (3.1 eV) excitation, to examine InxGa1−xN/GaN light-emitting diodes (LEDs) before the final stages of processing at room temperature. We have found dramatic differences in the time-resolved kinetics between dim, bright and super bright LED devices. The lifetime of the emission for dim LEDs is quite short, 110 ± 20 ps at photoluminescence (PL) maximum, and the kinetics are not dependent upon wavelength. This lifetime is short compared to bright and super bright LEDs, which we have examined under similar conditions. The kinetics of bright and super bright LEDs are clearly wavelength dependent, highly non-exponential, and are on the nanosecond time scale (lifetimes are in order of 1 ns for bright and 10 ns for super bright LED at the PL max). The non-exponential PL kinetics can be described by a stretched exponential function, indicating significant disorder in the material. Typical values for β, the stretching coefficient, are 0.45 – 0.6 for bright LEDs, at the PL maxima at room temperature. We attribute this disorder to indium alloy fluctuations.

From analysis of the stretched exponential kinetics we estimate the potential fluctuations to be approximately 75 meV in the super bright LED. Assuming a hopping mechanism, the average distance between indium quantum dots in the super bright LED is estimated to be 20 Å.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Nakamura, S. and Fasol, G., The Blue Laser Diode. New York: Springer, 1997.Google Scholar
[2] McCluskey, M. D., Romano, L. T., Krusor, B. T., Bour, D. P., Johnson, N. M., and Brennan, S., Applied Physics Letters 72 (1998), p. 1730.Google Scholar
[3] Pophristic, M., Long, F. H., Tran, C., Ferguson, I. T., and Karlicek, R. F. Jr., Applied Physics Letters 73, (1998), p. 3550, and Journal of Applied Physics 86 (1999), p. 1114.Google Scholar
[4] Vertikov, A., Ozden, I., and Nurmikko, A. V., Journal of Applied Physics 86 (1999), p. 4697.Google Scholar
[5] Lin, T. Y., Fan, J. C., and Chen, Y. F., Semiconductor Science & Technology 14 (1999), p. 406.Google Scholar
[6] O'Donnell, K. P., et al. , phys. stat. sol (b) 216 (1999) p. 141.Google Scholar
[7] Vial, J. C., et al. , Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992), p. 14171.Google Scholar
[8] Pophristic, M., Long, F. H., Tran, C., Ferguson, I. T., and Karlicek, R. F. Jr., Proceedings of SPIE 3621 (1999) p. 64.Google Scholar
[9] Schlesinger, M. F., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 39 (1988), p. 269.Google Scholar