Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-rpk4r Total loading time: 0.315 Render date: 2022-06-28T19:37:36.334Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Looking Back at Milošević’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: What Do Ordinary Participants Now Think of Their Involvement?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2019

Marko Grdešić*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Zagreb, Croatia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: grdesic@wisc.edu

Abstract

Most scholarship on Serbia’s antibureaucratic revolution of the late 1980s has emphasized elite actors while ignoring the motivations of ordinary participants. How do ordinary people describe their involvement? Moreover, given the antibureaucratic revolution’s dark side—such as exclusionary nationalism and political authoritarianism—it is important to investigate whether participants are willing to critically engage their personal political histories. What do they now say about their roles in this episode? In order to provide answers to this question, six focus groups with a total of 34 participants were organized in the town of Novi Sad, the location of one of the best-known rallies of the antibureaucratic revolution, the so-called yogurt revolution. Most people see their involvement in a rather negative way and regret taking part. However, two blind spots also appear that lessen their sense of personal responsibility: conspiracy theories and notions of urban superiority. The former shifts blame onto secret forces and the latter onto nonurban outsiders. Overall, the long-term legacies of the antibureaucratic revolution are negative: they are associated with cynicism and apathy.

Type
Special Issue Article
Copyright
© Association for the Study of Nationalities 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, Rory. 2018. “‘It Was Better When It Was Worse’: Blue-Collar Narratives of the Recent Past in Belgrade.” Social History 43 (1): 3055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, Rory, and Musić, Goran. 2017. “Approaching the Socialist Factory and Its Workforce: Considerations from Fieldwork in (Former) Yugoslavia.” Labor History 58 (1): 4466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banaji, Mahzarin R., and Greenwald, Anthony G.. 2016. Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Banjeglav, Tamara. 2013. “Dealing with the Past in Post-War Croatia: Perceptions, Problems, and Perspectives.” In Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans, edited by Simić, Olivera and Volčić, Zala, 3350. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Christopher. 1995. Yugoslavia’s Bloody Collapse: Causes, Course and Consequences. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Blanuša, Nebojša. 2011. Teorije zavjera i hrvatska politička zbilja 1980–2007. Zagreb: Plejada.Google Scholar
Bloor, Michael, Frankland, Jane, Thomas, Michelle, and Robson, Kate. 2001. Focus Groups in Social Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Lenard J. 2001. Serpent in the Bosom: The Rise and Fall of Slobodan Milošević. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ćorkalo, Dinka, Ajduković, Dejan, Weinstein, Harvey, and Biro, Mikos. 2004. “Neighbors Again? Intercommunity Relations after Ethnic Cleansing.” In My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, edited by Eric Stover and Harvey Weinstein , 143161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doderović, Milorad. 1990. Kako se dogodio Šolević. Niš, Serbia: Gradina.Google Scholar
Dragović-Soso, Jasna. 2002. Saviours of the Nation: Serbia’s Intellectual Opposition and the Revival of Nationalism. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Dragović-Soso, Jasna. 2008. “Why Did Yugoslavia Disintegrate? An Overview of Contending Explanations.” In State Collapse in South-Eastern Europe: New Perspectives on Yugoslavia’s Disintegration, edited by Cohen, Lenard and Dragović-Soso, Jasna, 139. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz. 1996. State against Society: Political Crises and Their Aftermath in East Central Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giugni, Marco. 1998. “Was it Worth the Effort? The Outcomes of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 371393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giugni, Marco. 2007. “Personal and Biographical Consequences.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 489507. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaurdić, Josip. 2011. Vrijeme Europe: Zapadne sile i raspad Jugoslavije. Zagreb, Croatia: Mate.Google Scholar
Gordy, Eric. 2014. Guilt, Responsibility, and Denial: The Past at Stake in Post-Milošević Serbia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Grdešić, Marko. 2016. “Serbia’s Anti-Bureaucratic Revolution as Manipulation? A Cultural Alternative to the Elite-Centric Approach.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 58 (3): 774803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennink, Monique. 2007. International Focus Group Research: A Handbook for the Health and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetland, Gabriel. 2014. “The Crooked Line: From Populist Mobilization to Participatory Democracy in Chavez-Era Venezuela.” Qualitative Sociology 37 (4): 373401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Robert. 2011. “Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism.” Theory and Society 29 (2): 7596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Robert. 2017. Revolutionizing Repertoires: The Rise of Populist Mobilization in Peru. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Stef. 2005a. Antinacionalizam: Etnografija otpora u Beogradu i Zagrebu. Belgrade: XX Vek.Google Scholar
Jansen, Stef, 2005b. “Who’s Afraid of White Socks? Towards a Critical Understanding of Post-Yugoslav Urban Self-Perceptions.” Ethnologia Balkanica 9: 151167.Google Scholar
Jović, Dejan. 2009. Yugoslavia: A State That Withered Away. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Jović, Dejan. 2014. “1989: Godina koja nam se nije dogodila.” Politička misao. December 7. http://politickamisao.com/1989-godina-koja-nam-se-nije-dogodila/. (Accessed February 16, 2019.)Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert. 1994. Balkan Ghosts: A Journey through History. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kojanić, Ognjen. 2015. “Nostalgia as a Practice of the Self in Post-Socialist Serbia.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 57 (3–4): 195212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langord, Joe, and McDonagh, Deana. 2003. Focus Groups. New York: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lekić, Bojana, Pavić, Zoran, and Lekić, Slaviša. 2009. Kako se događao narod (I): Antibirokratska revolucija (1987–1989). Beograd, Serbia: Službeni glasnik.Google Scholar
Little, Allan, and Silber, Laura. 1995. The Death of Yugoslavia. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1989. “The Biographical Consequences of Activism.” American Sociological Review 54 (5): 744760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1990. Freedom Summer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, David. 1996. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 129152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, David, and Krueger, Rirchard. 1993. “When to Use Focus Groups and Why.” In Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, edited by David Morgan , 319. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos. 1985. “On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities.” Politics and Society 14 (3): 329348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musić, Goran. 2016. “‘They Came as Workers and Returned as Serbs’: The Role of Rakovica’s Blue-Collar Workers in Serbian Social Mobilizations of the Late 1980s.” In Social Inequalities and Discontent in Yugoslav Socialism, edited by Archer, Rory, Duda, Igor, and Stubbs, Paul, 132154. Farnham: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nettelfield, Lara J. 2010. State, Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague Tribunal’s Impact in a Postwar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Obradović-Wochnik, Jelena. 2013. Ethnic Conflict and War Crimes in the Balkans: The Narratives of Denial in Post-Conflict Serbia. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Pavlaković, Vjeran. 2010. “Croatia, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, and General Gotovina as a Political Symbol.” Europe-Asia Studies 62 (10): 17071740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlowitch, Stevan K. 2002. Serbia: The History behind the Name. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Petrović, Tanja. 2010. “When We Were Europe: Socialist Workers in Serbia and their Nostalgic Narratives.” In Remembering Communism: Genres of Representation, edited by Todorova, Maria, 127153. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Puchta, Claudia, and Potter, Jonathan. 2004. Focus Group Practice. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina P. 2005. Thinking about Yugoslavia: Scholarly Debates about the Yugoslav Breakup and the Wars in Bosnia and Kosovo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolić, Ivor. 2016. “Researching Norms, Narratives, and Transitional Justice: Focus Group Methodology in Post-Conflict Croatia.” Nationalities Papers 44 (6): 932949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spasić, Ivana. 2006. “Asfalt: The Construction of Urbanity in Everyday Discourse in Serbia.” Ethnologia Balkanica 17 (10): 211227.Google Scholar
Stewart, David W., and Shamdasani, Prem N.. 2015. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Vladisavljević, Nebojša. 2008. Serbia’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: Milošević, the Fall of Communism and Nationalist Mobilization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladisavljević, Nebojš. 2019. “The Anti-Bureaucratic Revolution in an Age of Protest: Comparison across Time and Space,Nationalities Papers 47 (4): 545561.Google Scholar
Vujačić, Veljko. 1996. “Historical Legacies, Nationalist Mobilization, and Political Outcomes in Russia and Serbia: A Weberian View.” Theory and Society 25 (6): 763801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vujačić, Veljko. 2004. “Reexamining the ‘Serbian Exceptionalism’ Thesis.” Working Paper, Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies. http://iseees.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/u4/bps_/publications_/2004_03-vuja.pdf Google Scholar
Vujačić, Veljko. 2003. “From Class to Nation: Left, Right, and the Ideological and Institutional Roots of Post-Communist ‘National Socialism.’East European Politics and Societies 17 (3): 359392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vujačić, Veljko. 2015. Nationalism, Myth and the State in Russia and Serbia: Antecedents of the Dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Živković, Marko, 1997. “Violent Highlanders and Peaceful Lowlanders: Uses and Abuses of Ethno-Geography in the Balkans from Versailles to Dayton” In Ambiguous Identities in the New Europe, edited by Miklós Hadas and Miklós Vörös. Budapest: Replika Kö.Google Scholar
Živković, Marko. 2012. Srpski sanovnik: Nacionalni imaginarijum u vreme Miloševića. Belgrade: XX Vek.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Looking Back at Milošević’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: What Do Ordinary Participants Now Think of Their Involvement?
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Looking Back at Milošević’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: What Do Ordinary Participants Now Think of Their Involvement?
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Looking Back at Milošević’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: What Do Ordinary Participants Now Think of Their Involvement?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *