Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Konstantinova, Natalia and Orasan, Constantin 2013. Emerging Applications of Natural Language Processing.

    Habernal, Ivan Konopík, Miloslav and Rohlík, Ondrej 2012. Next Generation Search Engines.

    Wang, Dongsheng 2011. Answering contextual questions based on ontologies and question templates. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, Vol. 5, Issue. 4, p. 405.


Follow-up question handling in the IMIX and Ritel systems: A comparative study

  • B. W. VAN SCHOOTEN (a1), R. OP DEN AKKER (a1), S. ROSSET (a2), O. GALIBERT (a2), A. MAX (a2) and G. ILLOUZ (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2009

One of the basic topics of question answering (QA) dialogue systems is how follow-up questions should be interpreted by a QA system. In this paper, we shall discuss our experience with the IMIX and Ritel systems, for both of which a follow-up question handling scheme has been developed, and corpora have been collected. These two systems are each other's opposites in many respects: IMIX is multimodal, non-factoid, black-box QA, while Ritel is speech, factoid, keyword-based QA. Nevertheless, we will show that they are quite comparable, and that it is fruitful to examine the similarities and differences. We shall look at how the systems are composed, and how real, non-expert, users interact with the systems. We shall also provide comparisons with systems from the literature where possible, and indicate where open issues lie and in what areas existing systems may be improved. We conclude that most systems have a common architecture with a set of common subtasks, in particular detecting follow-up questions and finding referents for them. We characterise these tasks using the typical techniques used for performing them, and data from our corpora. We also identify a special type of follow-up question, the discourse question, which is asked when the user is trying to understand an answer, and propose some basic methods for handling it.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L. Boves , and E. den Os 2005. Interactivity and multimodality in the imix demonstrator. In Multimedia and Expo, ICME 2005, Amsterdam, pp. 15781581, IEEE, NJ, USA.

J.-C. Martin , S. Buisine , G. Pitel , and N. O. Bernsen 2006. Fusion of children's speech and 2D gestures when conversing with 3D characters. Signal Processing Journal 86 (12): 35963624 (special issue on multimodal interfaces).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Natural Language Engineering
  • ISSN: 1351-3249
  • EISSN: 1469-8110
  • URL: /core/journals/natural-language-engineering
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *