Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Energy and resilience: The effects of endogenous interdependencies on trade network formation across space among major Japanese firms

  • PETR MATOUS (a1) and YASUYUKI TODO (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

The dynamic drivers of interfirm interactions across space have rarely been explored in the context of disaster recovery; therefore, the mechanism through which shocks propagate is unclear. This paper uses stochastic actor-oriented modeling to examine how trade networks among the 500 largest Japanese companies evolved during 2010 and 2011, i.e. before and after the Great East Japan Earthquake to identify sources of vulnerability in the system. In contrast to previous reports on broken supply chains, the network displayed only modest change even in the directly affected areas. Controlling for distance and for firm size, we find that when firms changed their partners, they preferred firms that were popular among other firms, that had partners in common with them and that also bought some products or services from them. These findings concur with a criticism that Japanese firms avoid external actors and exhibit inflexibility in reorganizing their networks in times of need, which contrasts with the non-cliquish network structures observed in high-performing economic sectors. The results also highlight the role of energy firms in disaster resilience. Unlike other large Japanese companies that cluster in major urban centers, energy firms are distributed across Japan. However, despite their peripheral physical locations, energy firms are centrally located in trade networks. Thus, while a disaster in any region may affect some energy firms and lead to large-scale temporary shocks, the entire network is unlikely to be disconnected by any region-specific disaster because of the spatial distribution of the topological network core formed by energy companies.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Energy and resilience: The effects of endogenous interdependencies on trade network formation across space among major Japanese firms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Energy and resilience: The effects of endogenous interdependencies on trade network formation across space among major Japanese firms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Energy and resilience: The effects of endogenous interdependencies on trade network formation across space among major Japanese firms
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Acemoglu D., Ozdaglar A. & Tahbaz-Salehi A. (2015). Networks, shocks, and systemic risk. NBER Working Paper, (20931), 1–36.
Albert R., Jeong H., & Barabási A.-L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406 (6794), 378382.
Amiti M., & Cameron L. (2007). Economic geography and wages. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (1), 1529.
Anderson J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69 (1), 106116.
Antràs P., & Chor D. (2013). Organizing the global value chain. Econometrica, 81 (6), 21272204.
Antràs P., Chor D., Fally T., & Hillberry R. (2012). Measuring the upstreamness of production and trade flows. American Economic Review, 102 (3), 412416.
Aoyama H., Fujiwara Y., Ikeda Y., Iyetomi H., & Souma W. (2010). Econophysics and companies: Statistical life and death in complex business networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bailey J. P., & Bakos J. Y. (1997). An exploratory study of the emerging role of electronic intermediariations and policy. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19 (5), 406417.
Barthélemy M. (2011). Spatial networks. Physics Reports, 499 (1–3), 1101.
Bergstrand J. H., & Egger P. (2007). A knowledge-and-physical-capital model of international trade flows, foreign direct investment, and multinational enterprises. Journal of International Economics, 73 (2), 278308.
Cairncross F. (2001). The death of distance 2.0. New York and London: Texere.
Canals C., Gabaix X., Vilarrubia J. M., & Weinstein D. E. (2007). Trade patterns, trade balances and idiosyncratic shocks. Banco de España Research Paper No. WP-0721.
Caplow T., & Forman R. (1950). Neighborhood interaction in a homogeneous community. American Sociological Review, 15 (3), 357366.
Carrasco J. A., Hogan B., Wellman B., & Miller E. J. (2008a). Agency in social activity interactions: The role of social networks in time and space. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99 (5), 562583.
Carrasco J. A., & Miller E. J. (2006). Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: A social network approach. Transportation, 33 (5), 463480.
Carrasco J.-A., & Miller E. J. (2008). The social dimension in action: A multilevel, personal networks model of social activity frequency between individuals. Transportation Research Part A, 43 (1), 90104.
Carrasco J. A., Miller E. J., & Wellman B. (2008b). How far and with whom do people socialize? Empirical evidence about distance between social network members. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2076, 114122.
Carvalho V. M., Nirei M., & Saito Y. U. (2014). Supply chain disruptions: Evidence from the great east Japan earthquake. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, (14-E-035), 1–14.
Center For Spatial Information Science. University of Tokyo http://newspat.csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/geocode/.
Coleman J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (ArticleType: research-article / Issue Title: Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure / Full publication date: 1988 / Copyright © 1988 The University of Chicago Press), S95–S120.
Cooper M. C., Lambert D. M., & Pagh J. D. (1997). Supply chain management: More than a new name for logistics. International Journal of Logistics Management, 8 (1), 114.
Costinot A., Vogel J., & Wang S. (2013). An elementary theory of global supply chains. The Review of Economic Studies, 80 (1), 109144.
Daraganova G., Pattison P., Koskinen J., Mitchell B., Bill A., Watts M., & Baum S. (2012). Networks and geography: Modelling community network structures as the outcome of both spatial and network processes. Social Networks, 34 (1), 617.
Dixit A. K., & Grossman G. M. (1982). Trade and protection with multistage production. The Review of Economic Studies, 49 (4), 583594.
Duranton G., & Overman H. G. (2005). Testing for localization using micro-geographic data. The Review of Economic Studies, 72 (4), 10771106.
Duranton G., & Puga D. (2004). Chapter 48 micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In Henderson J. V., & Jacques-François T. (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics. vol. 4, (pp. 20632117). New York, NY: Elsevier.
Ellram L. M., & Cooper M. C. (1990). Supply chain management, partnership, and the shipper—third party relationship. International Journal of Logistics Management, 1 (2), 110.
Friedman T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Fujita M., & Thisse J.-F. (2013). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gabaix X. (2011). The granular origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 79 (3), 733772.
Gonzalez M. C., Hidalgo C. A., & Barabasi A.-L. (2008). Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature, 453 (7196), 779782.
Granovetter M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481510.
Granovetter M. (2005). Business groups and social organization. In Smelser N. J. & Swedberg R. (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Greenbaum S. D., & Greenbaum P. E. (1985). The ecology of social networks in four urban neighborhoods. Social Networks, 7 (1), 4776.
Harel D., & Koren Y. (2002). A fast multi-scale method for drawing large graphs. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 6 (3), 179202.
Hipp J. R., & Perrin A. J. (2009). The simoultaneous effects of social distance and physical distance on the formation of neighborhood ties. City & Community, 8 (1), 525.
Hoover E. M. Jr., (1937). Spatial price discrimination. The Review of Economic Studies, 4 (3), 182191.
Kim K. A., & Nofsinger J. R. (2005). Institutional herding, business groups, and economic regimes: Evidence from Japan. The Journal of Business, 78 (1), 213242.
Koskinen J., Caimo A., & Lomi A. (2015). Simultaneous modeling of initial conditions and time heterogeneity in dynamic networks: An application to foreign direct investments. Network Science, 3 (1), 5877.
Koskinen J., & Lomi A. (2013). The local structure of globalisation—the network dynamics of foreign direct investments in the international electricity industry. Journal of Statistical Physics, 151 (3–4), 523548.
Lincoln J., & Gerlach M. (2004). Japan's network economy: Structure, persistence, and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lospinoso J. A., & Snijders T. A. B. (2011). Goodness of fit for social network dynamics. Sunbelt XXXI. St. Pete's beach, Florida.
Marshall A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan and Co, Ltd. Library of Economics and Liberty [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP.html
Matous P., & Todo Y. (2015). Dissolve the keiretsu or die: A longitudinal study of disintermediation in the Japanese automobile industry. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, (15-E-039), 1–24.
Matous P., Todo Y., & Mojo D. (2013). Boots are made for walking: Interactions across physical and social space in infrastructure-poor regions. Journal of Transport Geography, 31 (0), 226235.
Mentzer J. T., DeWitt W., Keebler J. S., Min S., Nix N. W., Smith C. D., & Zacharia Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22 (2), 125.
Motohashi K. (2008). Growing R&D collaboration of Japanese firms and policy implications for reforming the national innovation system. Asia Pacific Business Review, 14 (3), 339361.
Nakajima K., Saito Y., & Uesugi I. (2012). Localization of interfirm transaction relationships and industry agglomeration. RIETI Discussion Paper Series. Tokyo: The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.
Nakajima K., & Todo Y. (2013). Determinants of transaction partners' quality: Evidence from the great east Japan earthquake. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, (13-J-024), 1–15.
Onnela J.-P., Arbesman S., González M. C., Barabási A.-L., & Christakis N. A. (2011). Geographic constraints on social network groups. PLoS ONE, 6 (4), e16939.
Preciado P., Snijders T. A. B., Burk W. J., Stattin H., & Kerr M. (2012). Does proximity matter? Distance dependence of adolescent friendships. Social Networks, 34 (1), 1831.
Puga D. (2010). The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies. Journal of Regional Science, 50 (1), 203219.
Ripley R., Snijders T. A. B., & Preciado P. (2012). Manual for SIENA version 4. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Robins G. (2013). Network governance of environmental systems: Structure, culture and effectiveness, day-to-day and in disasters. Paper presented at Xi'an INSNA conference. Xi'an.
Rosenthal S. S., & Strange W. C. (2001). The determinants of agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 50 (2), 191229.
Sanyal K. K. (1983). Vertical specialization in a ricardian model with a continuum of stages of production. Economica, 50 (197), 7178.
Sato H., Hirata N., Koketsu K., Okaya D., Abe S., Kobayashi R., . . . Harder S. (2005). Earthquake source fault beneath Tokyo. Science, 309 (5733), 462464.
Sato Y. (2012). The impact of the great east Japan earthquake on companies in the non-affected areas: Structure of the inter-company network of supply chains and its implication. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 12-J-020.
Schaefer D. R. (2012). Youth co-offending networks: An investigation of social and spatial effects. Social Networks, 34 (1), 141149.
Snijders T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31 (1), 361395.
Snijders T. A. B., Lomi A., & Torló V. J. (2013). A model for the multiplex dynamics of two-mode and one-mode networks, with an application to employment preference, friendship, and advice. Social Networks, 35 (2), 265276.
Snijders T. A. B., van de Bunt G. G., & Steglich C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32 (1), 4460.
Song C., Qu Z., Blumm N., & Barabási A.-L. (2010). Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science, 327 (5968), 10181021.
Steglich C., Snijders T. A. B., & Pearson M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40 (1), 329393.
Tallontire A. (2000). Partnerships in fair trade: Reflections from a case study of Cafe direct. Development in Practice, 10 (2), 166177.
Todo Y., Nakajima K., & Matous P. (2014). How do supply chain networks affect the resilience of firms to natural disasters? Evidence from the great east Japan earthquake. Journal of Regional Science, 55 (2), 209229.
Tokui J., Arai N., Kawasaki K., Miyagawa T., Fukao K., Arai S., . . . Noguchi N. (2012). Higashi-nihon dai-shinsai no keizaiteki eikyo: kako no saigai tono hikaku, sapurai chen no sundan koka, denryoku seiyaku no eikyo (in Japanese). RIETI Policy Discussion Paper, No. 12-P-004.
Tokyo Shoko Research (2010). Kigyou Soukan Jouhou Tokyo Shoko Research. Tokyo Shoko Research, Tokyo.
van der Berg P., Arentze T., & Timmermans H. (2010). A multilevel path analysis of contact frequency between social network members. Geographical Systems, 14 (2), 117.
Wellman B., & Tindall D. B. (1992). How telephone networks connect social networks. Progress in Communication Research, 13, 6394.
Wilkerson G. K., Ramin & Schmid S. (2013). Urban mobility scaling: lessons from ‘Little Data’. ARXIV arXiv:1401.0207, 6.
Wilson A. G. (1967). A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research, 1 (3), 253269.
Woo-Sung J., Fengzhong W., & Stanley H. E. (2008). Gravity model in the Korean highway. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 81 (4), 48005.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Network Science
  • ISSN: 2050-1242
  • EISSN: 2050-1250
  • URL: /core/journals/network-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Matous and Todo supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (649 KB)
649 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 312 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 717 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.