Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T20:29:34.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Common Ground? The Role of Galatians 2.16 in Paul's Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2007

IAN W. SCOTT
Affiliation:
Tyndale Seminary, Toronto, Ontario M2M 4B3, Canada

Abstract

Several scholars have argued that Paul's statements about ‘justification’ in Gal 2.16 are intended to serve as common ground with his Galatian opponents. Yet Paul seems to argue polemically for the same idea in 2.21. Moreover, the structure of Paul's diatribal rhetoric in 2.16–21 suggests that Paul thought his statements in 2.16 would be controversial. When we observe that Paul continues to argue through chs. 3 and 4 for this same understanding of ‘justification’, it becomes clear that the Apostle expected his views in 2.16 to meet stiff resistance in Galatia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Stephen Westerholm and Terence Donaldson for their helpful feedback on earlier drafts of this paper.