We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2009
The functioning of human consciousness in interpreting and staging a theatrical performance is, as Gordon Armstrong argues in this article, among the most highly selective and adaptive operations known to physical science. According to this view, the theatre, as a substrate of consciousness, was part of the package that defined modern man as a reflective species: whereas for the first four million years of human existence man was silent about a probable inner life, the dawn of empathy some 200,000 years ago saw a neural explosion – the enlargement of the angular gyrus in the left hemisphere of the brain, unlocking a new kind of reflective consciousness. In isolation, this aberrant neurological connection proved so advantageous for hunting and for communication that members of a tribe who possessed this aberration prospered: and adaptation to the ice ages that began 200,000 years ago was a motivating factor in stimulating the emergence of what we can recognize as art. Gordon Armstrong is immediate past Secretary of the American Society for Theatre Research, and Review Editor for Theatre Research International. He has taught at UCLA, SUNY Stony Brook, and the University of Rhode Island, and has designed and directed productions in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York. His full-length works include the revised Golden Ages of the Theatre and Samuel Beckett, W.B. Yeats, and Jack Yeats: Images and Words.
1. Part, Candace, ‘Quiet Miracles of the Brain’, National Geographic, CLXXXVII, No. 6 (06 1995), p. 25Google Scholar.
2. John Briggs, Fractals, the Pattern of Chaos: Discovering a New Aesthetic of Art, Science, and Nature; Ilya Prigogine and Isabelle Stengers, Order out of Chaos.
3. John Briggs and David Peat, Turbulent Mirror.
4. Gleick, James, Chaos: the Making of a New Science (New York: Penguin Books, 1987), p. 29 ffGoogle Scholar.
5. George, David E. R., ‘Quantum Theatre – Potential Theatre: a New Paradigm?’, New Theatre Quarterly, V, No. 18 (1989), p. 171–9Google Scholar; Demastes, William W., ‘Reinspecting the Crack in the Chimney: Chaos Theory from Ibsen to Stoppard’, New Theatre Quarterly, X, No. 39 (1994), p. 242–54Google Scholar.
6. Heuvel, Michael Vanden, ‘The Politics of the Paradigm: a Case Study in Chaos Theory’, New Theatre Quarterly, IX, No. 35 (08 1993), p. 255–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7. Crick, Francis, The Astonishing Hypothesis: the Scientific Search forthe Soul (Touchstone/Simon and Schuster, 1994)Google Scholar; Dennet, Daniel, Consciousness Explained, (Back Bay/Little Brown, 1994)Google Scholar; Edelman, Daniel, The Remembered Present: a Biological Theory of Consciousness (Basic Books, 1995)Google Scholar; Edelman, Gerald, Bright Air Brilliant Fire: on the Matter of the Mind (Basic Books, 1994)Google Scholar; Penrose, Roger, Shadows of the Mind: a Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness (Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Rosenfield, Israel, The Strange, Familiar, and Forgotten: an Anatomy of Consciousness (Vintage, 1995)Google Scholar.
8. Searle, John, ‘The Mystery of Consciousness’, New York Review of Books, XLII, No. 17, p. 60–6Google Scholar, and XLIII, No. 18, p. 54–61.
9. Searle, Review, XLIII, p. 61.
10. Fischer-Lichte, Erika, ‘Theatre Historiography and Performance Analysis: Different Fields – Common Approaches?’, Assaphi, Sec. C, No. 10 (1994), p. 99Google Scholar.
11. Carlson, Marvin, ‘Indexical Space in the Theatre’, Assaphi, Sec. C, No. 10 (1994), p. 9Google Scholar.
12. Lyons, Charles, ‘Character and Theatrical Space’, in Themes in Drama 9: Theatrical Space, ed. Redmond, James (Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 36Google Scholar.
13. Carlson, ‘Indexical’, p. 9.
14. Richard Schechner's commentary on his production of Black Bottom in America and in South Africa, unpublished to date, is instructive.
15. Goldman-Rakic, Patricia, ‘Neurobiology of Mental Representation’, in The Mind, the Brain, and Complex Adaptive Systems, ed. Morowitz, Harold J. and Singer, Harold L., Vol. XXI (Addison-Wesley, 1995), p. 51Google Scholar.
16. Kauffman, Stuart, At Home in the Universe: the Search for Laws of Self Organization and Complexity (Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.
17. Armstrong, Gordon, ‘Cultural Politics and the Irish Theatre: Samuel Beckett and the New Biology’, Theatre Research International, XVIII, No. 3, p. 215–21Google Scholar. ‘The fact is that when we examine evolution, it is immediately apparent that the figure of an actor appearing on-stage in a performance arena is only one tiny fragment of an epic story whose likelihood is manifestly unreasonable’ (p. 216).
18. Madison, G. B., The Hermeneutics of Postmodernity: Figures and Themes (Indiana University Press), p. 155 ffGoogle Scholar.
19. Dennet, Daniel C., ‘The Mystery of Consciousness: an Exchange’, New York Review of Books, XLII, No. 20 (21 12 1995), p. 83Google Scholar.
20. John Searle, Review, XLII, p. 84.
21. Swerdlow, Joel L., ‘The Healthy Brain’, National Geographic, CLXXXVII, No. 6 (06 1995), p. 14Google Scholar.
22. Gore, Rick, ‘The Dawn of Humans: Neandertals’, National Geographic, CLXXXIX, No. 1 (01 1996), p. 21Google Scholar.
23. See Lieberman, Philip, Uniquely Human: the Evolution of Speech, Thought, and Selfless Behaviour (Harvard University Press, 1991), p. 101 ffGoogle Scholar; Mielin, Donald, Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition (Harvard University Press, 1991), p. 23 ffGoogle Scholar; Eccles, John, Evolution of the Brain: Creation of the Self (Routledge, 1989), p. 12 ffGoogle Scholar; and Jastrow, Robert, The Enchanted Loom: Mind in the Universe (Simon and Schuster, 1981), p. 30 ffGoogle Scholar, for a sampling of thought on this topic.
