Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T11:51:27.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Normative ratings for 111 Swedish nouns and corresponding picture stimuli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2021

Tomas Lehecka Open the ORCID record for Tomas Lehecka [Opens in a new window]
Tomas Lehecka*
Affiliation:
Åbo Akademi University, Tuomiokirkontori 3, 20500 Turku, Finland & Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, P.O. Box 310, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Email for correspondence: tomas.lehecka@abo.fi
Get access

Abstract

Normative ratings are a means to control for the effects of confounding variables in psycholinguistic experiments. This paper introduces a new dataset of normative ratings for Swedish encompassing 111 concrete nouns and the corresponding picture stimuli in the MultiPic database (Duñabeitia et al. 2017). The norms for name agreement, category typicality, age of acquisition and subjective frequency were collected using online surveys among native speakers of the Finland-Swedish variety of Swedish. The paper discusses the inter-correlations between these variables and compares them against available ratings for other languages. In doing so, the paper argues that ratings for age of acquisition and subjective frequency collected for other languages may be applied to psycholinguistic studies on Finland-Swedish, at least with respect to concrete and highly imageable nouns. In contrast, norms for name agreement should be collected from speakers of the same language variety as represented by the subjects in the actual experiments.

Keywords

age of acquisitioncategory typicalityFinland-SwedishMultiPic databasename agreementnormative ratingspsycholinguisticssubjective frequencySwedishword ratings
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , May 2023 , pp. 20 - 45
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Nordic Association of Linguistics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alario, F.-Xavier & Ferrand, Ludovic. 1999. A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31(3), 531–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, Ben, Evan, Kidd, Rowland, Caroline F. & Theakston, Anna L.. 2015. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42(2), 239–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baayen, R. Harald, Petar, Milin & Michael, Ramscar. 2016. Frequency in lexical processing. Aphasiology 30(11), 1174–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balota, David A., Maura, Pilotti & Cortese, Michael J.. 2001. Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition 29(4), 639–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barca, Laura, Cristina, Burani & Arduino, Lisa S.. 2002. Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34(3), 424–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, Christopher, Morrison, Catriona M. & Ellis, Andrew W.. 1997. Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A 50(3), 560–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolozzi, Federica, Jongman, Suzanne R. & Meyer, Antje S.. 2021. Concurrent speech planning does not eliminate repetition priming from spoken words: Evidence from linguistic dual-tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 47(3), 466–480.Google Scholar
Battig, William F. & Montague, William E.. 1969. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80(3), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birchenough, Julia M., Robert, Davies & Vincent, Connelly. 2017. Rated age-of-acquisition norms for over 3,200 German words. Behavior Research Methods 49(2), 484–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjorklund, David F. & Thompson, Barbara E.. 1983. Category typicality effects in children’s memory performance: Qualitative and quantitative differences in the processing of category information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 35(2), 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, Frida & Carl, Öberg. 2015. Swedish and English word ratings of imageability, familiarity and age of acquisition are highly correlated. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38(3), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boada, Roger, Marc, Guasch, Juan, Haro, Josep, Demestre & Pilar, Ferré. 2020. SUBTLEX-CAT: Subtitle word frequencies and contextual diversity for Catalan. Behavior Research Methods 52(1), 360–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonin, Patrick, Alain, Méot, Lagarrigue, Aurélie & Sébastien, Roux. 2015. Written object naming, spelling to dictation, and immediate copying: Different tasks, different pathways? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 68(7), 1268–1294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borin, Lars, Markus, Forsberg & Johan, Roxendal. 2012. Korp: The corpus infrastructure of Språkbanken. Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), 474–478.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera, Schmidt, Lauren A. & Webb, Phillips. 2003. Sex, syntax, and semantics. In Dedre, Gentner & Susan, Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, 61–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boukadi, Mariem, Cirine, Zouaidi & Wilson, Maximiliano A.. 2016. Norms for name agreement, familiarity, subjective frequency, and imageability for 348 object names in Tunisian Arabic. Behavior Research Methods 48(2), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brysbaert, Marc & Andrew, Biemiller. 2017. Test-based age-of-acquisition norms for 44 thousand English word meanings. Behavior Research Methods 49(4), 1520–1523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brysbaert, Marc & Cortese, Michael J.. 2011. Do the effects of familiarity and age of acquisition survive better frequency norms? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64, 545–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brysbaert, Marc & Mandy, Ghyselinck. 2006. The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent. Visual Cognition 13(7–8), 992–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc & Boris, New. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4), 977–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, Ilse Van, Wijnendaele & Simon, De Deyne. 2000. Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica 104(2), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, Qing & Marc, Brysbaert. 2010. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS One 5(6), e10729. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalard, Marylène, Patrick, Bonin, Alain, Méot, Bruno, Boyer & Michel, Fayol. 2003. Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 15(2), 209–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connine, Cynthia M., John, Mullennix, Eve, Shernoff & Jennifer, Yelen. 1990. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16(6), 1084–1096.Google ScholarPubMed
Cortese, Michael J. & Khanna, Maya M.. 2007. Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60(8), 1072–1082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cubelli, Roberto, Daniela, Paolieri, Lorella, Lotto & Remo, Job. 2011. The effect of grammatical gender on object categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37(2), 449–460.Google ScholarPubMed
Cuetos, Fernando, Ellis, Andrew W. & Bernardo, Alvarez. 1999. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31(4), 650–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell’acqua, Roberto, Lorella, Lotto & Remo, Job. 2000. Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 32(4), 588–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desrochers, Alain & Thompson, Glenn L.. 2009. Subjective frequency and imageability ratings for 3,600 French nouns. Behavior Research Methods 41(2), 546–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimitropoulou, Maria, Duñabeitia, Jon A., Alberto, Avilés, José, Corral & Manuel, Carreiras. 2010. Subtitle-based word frequencies as the best estimate of reading behavior: The case of Greek. Frontiers in Psychology 1, 218. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duñabeitia, Jon A., Davide, Crepaldi, Meyer, Antje S., Boris, New, Christos, Pliatsikas, Eva, Smolka & Marc, Brysbaert. 2017. MultiPic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71(4), 808–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, Andrew J. & Maier, Markus A.. 2014. Color psychology: Effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annual Review of Psychology 65, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, Andrew W. & Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.. 2000. Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(5), 1103–1123.Google ScholarPubMed
Ellis, Andrew W. & Morrison, Catriona M.. 1998. Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24(2), 515–523.Google ScholarPubMed
Ellis, Nick C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2), 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrand, Ludovic, Patrick, Bonin, Alain, Méot, Maria, Augustinova, Boris, New, Christophe, Pallier & Marc, Brysbaert. 2008. Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods 40(4), 1049–1054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrand, Ludovic, Marc, Brysbaert, Emmanuel, Keuleers, Boris, New, Patrick, Bonin, Alain, Méot, Maria, Augustinova & Christophe, Pallier. 2011. Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: Evidence from Chronolex. Frontiers in Psychology 2, 306. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauvin, Hanna S., Jonen, Magdalena K., Jessica, Choi, Katie, McMahon & de Zubicaray, Greig I.. 2018. No lexical competition without priming: Evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71(12), 2562–2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton A. 1984. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(2), 256–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilhooly, Ken J. & Logie, Robert H.. 1980. Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 12(4), 395–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Wilhelm R. 1992. Picture naming. Cognition 42(1–3), 61–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, Arnold L. & Holyoak, Keith J.. 1974. Alternative conceptions of semantic theory. Cognition 3(4), 313–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Michael S. & Bjorklund, David F.. 1981. Category typicality in free recall: Effects of feature overlap or differential category encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7(2), 145–147.Google Scholar
Grigoriev, Andrei & Ivan, Oshhepkov. 2013. Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 286 words in Russian: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods 45(4), 1208–1217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herdağdelen, Amaç & Marco, Marelli. 2017. Social media and language processing: How Facebook and Twitter provide the best frequency estimates for studying word recognition. Cognitive Science 41(4), 976–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, Selina J. & Ellis, Andrew W.. 2006. Age of acquisition and typicality effects in three object processing tasks. Visual Cognition 13(7–8), 884–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivars, Ann-Marie (ed.). 2015. Dialekter och småstadsspråk [Dialects and urban colloquial language] (Svenskan i Finland – i dag och i går 1). Helsingfors: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
Jescheniak, Jörg D. & Levelt, Willem J.. 1994. Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20(4), 824–843.Google Scholar
Johnson, Carla J., Allan, Paivio & Clark, James M.. 1996. Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin 120(1), 113–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Kathy E. 2001. Impact of varying levels of expertise on decisions of category typicality. Memory & Cognition 29(7), 1036–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, Robert A. & Christopher, Barry. 2006. Age of acquisition and lexical processing. Visual Cognition 13(7–8), 789–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juhasz, Barbara J. 2005. Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin 131(5), 684–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juhasz, Barbara J. & Keith, Rayner. 2006. The role of age of acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition 13(7–8), 846–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Dennis & George, Kellas. 1978. Typicality as a dimension of encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4(1), 78–85.Google Scholar
Kiran, Swathi, Katerina, Ntourou & Megan, Eubank. 2007. The effect of typicality on online category verification of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia. Aphasiology 21(9), 844–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiran, Swathi & Thompson, Cynthia K.. 2003. Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia. Brain and Language 85(3), 441–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhbandner, Christof, Bernhard, Spitzer, Stephanie, Lichtenfeld & Reinhard, Pekrun. 2015. Differential binding of colors to objects in memory: Red and yellow stick better than blue and green. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 231. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuperman, Victor, Hans, Stadthagen-Gonzalez & Marc, Brysbaert. 2012. Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods 44(4), 978–990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambon, Ralph, Matthew, A. & Sheeba, Ehsan. 2006. Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence. Visual Cognition 13(7–8), 928–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiner, D. J. 2019. SoSci Survey (Version 3.1. 06). [Computer software] Available at www.soscisurvey.de.Google Scholar
Lété, Bernard & Patrick, Bonin. 2013. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 66(5), 973–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, Willem J., Ardi, Roelofs & Meyer, Antje S.. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, Michael B. 1999. Age of acquisition in face categorisation: Is there an instance-based account? Cognition 71(1), B23–B39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, Michael B., Simon, Gerhand & Ellis, Hadyn D.. 2001. Re-evaluating age-of-acquisition effects: Are they simply cumulative-frequency effects? Cognition 78(2), 189–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lind, Marianne, Simonsen, Hanne G., Pernille, Hansen, Elisabeth, Holm & Bjørn-Helge, Mevik. 2015. Norwegian Words: A lexical database for clinicians and researchers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 29(4), 276–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lison, Pierre & Jörg, Tiedemann. 2016. Opensubtitles2016: Extracting large parallel corpora from movie and TV subtitles. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), 923–929.Google Scholar
Lotto, Lorella, Luca, Surian & Remo, Job. 2010. Objective age of acquisition for 223 Italian words: Norms and effects on picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods 42(1), 126–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Łuniewska, Magdalena, Ewa, Haman, Sharon, Armon-Lotem, Bartłomiej, Etenkowski, Frenette, Southwood, Darinka, Anđelković, Elma, Blom, Tessel, Boerma, Shula, Chiat & de Abreu, Pascale E.. 2016. Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: Is there a cross-linguistic order of words? Behavior Research Methods 48(3), 1154–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, Daniel L., Sale, Martin V. & Robinson, Gail A.. 2019. Differentiating beyond name agreement for picture naming: Insight from age-related selection deficits. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62(5), 1373–1380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinelli, Rita, Lisa, Biagini, Remo, Bindi, Sara, Goggi, Monica, Monachini, Paola, Orsolini, Eugenio, Picchi, Sergio, Rossi, Nicoletta, Calzolari & Antonio, Zampolli. 2003. The Italian PAROLE corpus: An overview. Computational Linguistics in Pisa, XVI–XVII, IEPI., I, 401–421.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Michael & Sam, Glucksberg. 1979. Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory. Cognitive Psychology 11(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medin, Douglas L. & Smith, Edward E.. 1984. Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology 35(1), 113–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mervis, Carolyn B. & Eleanor, Rosch. 1981. Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology 32(1), 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, Padraic & Ellis, Andrew W.. 2010. Modeling reading development: Cumulative, incremental learning in a computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language 63(4), 506–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moors, Agnes, Jan De, Houwer, Dirk, Hermans, Sabine, Wanmaker, Kevin Van, Schie, Anne-Laura, Van Harmelen, Maarten De, Schryver, Jeffrey De, Winne & Marc, Brysbaert. 2013. Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4,300 Dutch words. Behavior Research Methods 45(1), 169–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, Catriona M., Chappell, Tameron D. & Ellis, Andrew W.. 1997. Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A 50(3), 528–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Catriona M., Ellis, Andrew W. & Quinlan, Philip T.. 1992. Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory & Cognition 20(6), 705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrby, Catrin, Camilla, Wide, Jan, Lindström & Jenny, Nilsson. 2012. Finland Swedish as a non-dominant variety of Swedish: Extending the scope to pragmatic and interactional aspects. In Rudolf, Muhr (ed.), Non-dominant Varieties of Pluricentric Languages: Getting the Picture, 49–60. Wien & Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
Perret, Cyril & Patrick, Bonin. 2018. Which variables should be controlled for to investigate picture naming in adults? A Bayesian meta-analysis. Behavior Research Methods 51, 2533–2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pind, Jörgen, Halla, Jónsdóttir, Hjördis, Gissurardóttir & Frosti, Jónsson. 2000. Icelandic norms for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) pictures: Name and image agreement, familiarity, and age of acquisition. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 41(1), 41–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Postman, Leo & Beverly, Conger. 1954. Verbal habits and the visual recognition of words. Science 119(3098), 671–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rips, Lance J., Shoben, Edward J. & Smith, Edward E.. 1973. Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rofes, Adrià, Lilla, Zakariás, Klaudia, Ceder, Marianne, Lind, Johansson, Monica B., Vânia De, Aguiar, Jovana, Bjekić, Valantis, Fyndanis, Anna, Gavarró & Simonsen, Hanne G.. 2018. Imageability ratings across languages. Behavior Research Methods 50(3), 1187–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3), 192–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor & Mervis, Carolyn B.. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7(4), 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossion, Bruno & Gilles, Pourtois. 2004. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception 33(2), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sailor, Kevin M., Zimmerman, Molly E. & Sanders, Amy E.. 2011. Differential impacts of age of acquisition on letter and semantic fluency in Alzheimer’s disease patients and healthy older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64(12), 2383–2391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuel, Steven, Geoff, Cole & Eacott, Madeline J.. 2019. Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26(6), 1767–1786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schröder, Astrid, Teresa, Gemballa, Steffie, Ruppin & Isabell, Wartenburger. 2012. German norms for semantic typicality, age of acquisition, and concept familiarity. Behavior Research Methods 44(2), 380–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwanenflugel, Paula J. & Mario, Rey. 1986. The relationship between category typicality and concept familiarity: Evidence from Spanish- and English-speaking monolinguals. Memory & Cognition 14(2), 150–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, Claude E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Grinell. 2008. Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 501717 (2008). Available at https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=elementary_ed_pub.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Joan G. & Mary, Vanderwart. 1980. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6(2), 174–215.Google ScholarPubMed
Snodgrass, Joan G. & Tanya, Yuditsky. 1996. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28(4), 516–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soares, Ana P., Costa, Ana S., João, Machado, Montserrat, Comesaña & Oliveira, Helena M.. 2017. The Minho Word Pool: Norms for imageability, concreteness, and subjective frequency for 3,800 Portuguese words. Behavior Research Methods 49(3), 1065–1081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stadthagen-Gonzalez, Hans & Davis, Colin J.. 2006. The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods 38(4), 598–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanczak, Louise, Gloria, Waters & David, Caplan. 2006. Typicality-based learning and generalisation in aphasia: Two case studies of anomia treatment. Aphasiology 20(02–04), 374–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tandefelt, Marika (ed.). 2015. Gruppspråk, samspråk, två språk [Group varieties, conversations, two languages] (Svenskan i Finland – i dag och i går 2). Helsingfors: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
Torrance, Mark, Guido, Nottbusch, Alves, Rui A., Barbara, Arfé, Lucile, Chanquoy, Evgeny, Chukharev-Hudilainen, Ioannis, Dimakos, Raquel, Fidalgo, Jukka, Hyönä & Jóhannesson, Ómar I.. 2018. Timed written picture naming in 14 European languages. Behavior Research Methods 50(2), 744–758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsaparina, Diana, Patrick, Bonin & Alain, Méot. 2011. Russian norms for name agreement, image agreement for the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures and age of acquisition, conceptual familiarity, and imageability scores for modal object names. Behavior Research Methods 43(4), 1085–1099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uyeda, Katherine M. & George, Mandler. 1980. Prototypicality norms for 28 semantic categories. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 12(6), 587–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Overschelde, James P., Rawson, Katherine A. & John, Dunlosky. 2004. Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the norms. Journal of Memory and Language 50(3), 289–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitkovitch, Melanie & Lisa, Tyrrell. 1995. Sources of disagreement in object naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A 48(4), 822–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zevin, Jason D. & Seidenberg, Mark S.. 2002. Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and language 47(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lehecka supplementary material

Lehecka supplementary material 1

Download Lehecka supplementary material(File)
File 43.3 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Lehecka supplementary material

Lehecka supplementary material 2

Download Lehecka supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 329.7 KB