Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T05:05:56.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New evidence for the life habit of graptoloids from physical modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Susan Rigby
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom
Barrie Rickards
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom

Abstract

Physical models of graptolites have been constructed for a range of morphologies, with emphasis on planar, multiramous forms. The models are life size and have the density of a living graptolite, based on the now-established collagenous nature of the periderm and unavoidable assumptions about the amount of extrathecal tissue present in the living colony. These models have been used to test the two main hypotheses of graptolite life habit developed by Bulman, Rickards, Kirk, and others. Testing of graptoloid models in water suggests that many rhabdosome shapes were designed for passive rotation within the water column. This is caused in the models by a variety of modifications, including changes in thecal and stipe orientation, alterations of colony shape and the addition of vanes and hooks. Rotation would only have been useful when the rhabdosome was in directional motion and the frequency of such modifications seems anomalous if no such movement occurred. Thus movement by some means is required, either passively, by changes in buoyancy, or by automobility. Spiralling action would increase the harvesting path of an individual living on a planar, multiramous colony, making this a theoretically advantageous mode of life for the morphology. It would prevent the individual zooids of scandent biserial and uniserial colonies from feeding from the same narrow band of water.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bates, D. E. B. 1987. The density of graptoloid skeletal tissue and its implication for the volume and density of soft tissue. Lethaia 20:149156.Google Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. 1964. Lower Palaeozoic plankton. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London 120:455476.Google Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. 1970. Graptolithina. In Teichert, C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, Part V. Second Edition. The Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas; Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B., and Stormer, L. 1971. Buoyancy structures in rhabdosomes of Dictyonema flabelliforme (Eichwald). Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift 51:2531.Google Scholar
Burton, M. 1960. A marvellous deep-sea animal. The Illustrated London News 1960:262.Google Scholar
Crowther, P. R., and Rickards, R. B. 1977. Cortical bandages and the graptolite zooid. Geology and Palaeontogy 11:946.Google Scholar
Elles, G. L., and Wood, E. M. R. 1901. A Monograph of British Graptolites. Palaeontographical Society; London.Google Scholar
Finney, S. C. 1985. Nemagraptid graptolites from the Middle Ordovician Athens Shale, Alabama. Journal of Paleontology 59:11001137.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Bell, A. 1987. Branching geometry and function of multiramous graptoloids. Paleobiology 13:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W. D. V., and Rickards, R. B. 1967. Diplograptus penna Hopkinson 1896, and its bearing on vesicular structures. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 41:173183.Google Scholar
Kirk, N. H. 1967. Some thoughts on the ecology, mode of life and evolution of the Graptolithina. Proceedings of the Geological Society of London 1659:273292.Google Scholar
Kirk, N. H. 1972. More thoughts on the automobility of the graptolites. Journal of the Geological Society of London 128:127133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, N. H. 1978. Mode of life of graptolites. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 23:533555.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C. 1974. A membrane-bearing Cyrtograptus, and an interpretation of the hydrodynamics of the cyrtograptids. Special Papers in Palaeontology 13:205214.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. E., and Carle, K. J. 1986. The nematularium of Pseudoclimacograptus scharenbergi (Lapworth) and its secretion. Palaeontology 29:373390.Google Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. 1983. Plankton and productivity in the oceans, Second Edition. Volume 2: Zooplankton. Pergamon Press; Oxford.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B. 1975. Palaeoecology of the Graptolithina, an extinct class of the Phylum Hemichordata. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 50:397436.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B., and Crowther, P. R. 1979. New observations on the mode of life, evolution and ultrastructure of graptolites. Pp. 397410. In Larwood, G., and Rosen, B. R. (eds.), Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms. Systematics Association Special Volume 11.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B., and Dumican, L. W. 1984. The fibrillar component of the graptolite periderm. Irish Journal of Earth Sciences 6:175203.Google Scholar
Towe, K. M., and Urbanek, A. 1972. Collagen-like structures in Ordovician graptolite periderm. Nature 237:433445.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1981. Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow. Willard Grant Press; Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Ward-Smith, A. J. 1984. Biophysical aerodynamics and the natural environment. John Wiley and Sons; Chichester.Google Scholar
Williams, S. H. 1981. Form and mode of life of Dicellograptus (Graptolithina). Geological Magazine 118:401408.Google Scholar