Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:48:50.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental influences on egg production by the monogenean Protopolystoma xenopodis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Helen C. Jackson  and
R. C. Tinsley
Helen C. Jackson
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary College, London University, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS
R. C. Tinsley
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary College, London University, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A continuous succession of egg capsules is formed in the ootype of Protopolystoma xenopodis and released into the urinary bladder of the host, Xenopus laevis. Since egg capsules are passed out with the aquatic toad's urine several times a day, the rate of parasite egg production can be recorded accurately by direct counts. Temperature has a marked influence on the rate of egg output which doubles in response to a rise from 17 to 25 °C. Under constant temperature conditions regular egg collections from isolated toads infested with single Protopolystoma revealed that rates of production remain stable for periods of several weeks. The overall mean rate of egg production was 8·9 eggs/worm/day (e.w.d.) at 20·0±0·5 °C (based on 5 consecutive egg collections from 58 individual parasites). Significant differences were observed, however, between the mean rates of output from different hosts, ranging from 2·1 e.w.d. (s.d. = 0·6) to 17·7 e.w.d. (S.D. = 3·2). Neither differences in worm age nor host-factors could explain the observed range in output. Worms transferred to new hosts resumed egg production at pre-transfer rates, suggesting inherent differences in the capacity for egg production by individual parasites. Total production increased with increasing worm burden, but output per parasite was significantly reduced in groups of 2, 3 or 4. Whilst competition for some finite resource provides one interpretation, this observation could equally reflect a statistical phenomenon associated with the reduced chance of encountering groups of individuals which are heterogeneous for egg production as worm burden increases and sample size decreases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , August 1988 , pp. 115 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. M. & Schad, G. A. (1985). Hookworm burdens and faecal egg counts: an analysis of the biological basis of variation. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 79, 812–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chai, J. Y., Hong, S. T., Lee, S. H. & Seo, B. S. (1981). Fluctuation of the egg production amounts according to worm burden and length of Ascaris lumbricoides. Korean Journal of Parasitology 19, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cioli, D., Knopf, P. M. & Senft, A. W. (1977). A study of Schistosoma mansoni transferred into permissive and non permissive hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 7, 293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, P. M. Z., Souza, R. C. A., Bredt, A. & Souza-Neto, J. A. (1976). The crowding effect in Schistosoma mansoni infection in hamsters: influence on worm size. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo 18, 440–2.Google ScholarPubMed
Combes, C. (1972). Écologie des Polystomatidae (Monogenea): Facteurs influençant le volume et le rhythme de la ponte. International Journal for Parasitology 2, 233–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavell, D. J., Flavell, S. U. & Field, G. F. (1983). Opisthorchis viverrini: the relationship between egg production, worm size and intensity of infection in the hamster. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 77, 538–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, B. & Freeborne, N. E. (1984). Effects of Echinostoma revolutum (Trematoda) adults on various dimensions of the chicken intestine, and observations on worm crowding. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 51, 297–300.Google Scholar
Glassburg, G. H. & Bone, L. W. (1981). Insemination and egg production of mouse-adapted Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nematoda). International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction 3, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. (1982). Intestinal helminths of man: the interpretation of egg counts. Parasitology 85, 605–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, H. C. (1986). Environmental factors and helminth egg production: experimental investigations using polystomatid monogeneans. Ph.D. thesis. University of London.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. C. & Tinsley, R. C. (1988). The capacity for viable egg production by the monogenean Protopolystoma xenoopodis. International Journal for Parasitology (in the Press).Google Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1985). Observations on egg production in the monogenean Entobdella soleae. International Journal for Parasitology 15, 187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, M. W., Wakelin, D. & Wilson, M. M. (1979). Transplantation of adult Trichinella spiralis between hosts: worm survival and immunological characteristics of the host-parasite relationship. Parasitology 78, 121–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerboeuf, D. & Jacob, C. (1983). Rhythmic egg release by Heligomosoides polygyrus (Nematospiroides dubius), parasitic Trichostrongylida of the murine gut. Chronobiologia 10, 255–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Keymer, A. E. (1982). Density-dependent mechanisms in the regulation of intestinal helminth populations. Parasitology 84, 573–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keymer, A. E. & Slater, A. F. G. (1987). Helminth fecundity: density dependence or statistical illusion? Parasitology Today 3, 56–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knopf, P. M. (1982). The role of host hormones in controlling survival and development of Schistosoma mansoni. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 15, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, J. A. (1973). Schistosoma mattheei in cattle: variations in parasite egg production. Research in Veterinary Science 14, 402–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macdonald, S. & Jones, A. (1978). Egg-laying and hatching rhythms in the monogenean Diplozoon homoion gracile from the Southern barbel (Barbus meridionalis). Journal of Helminthology 52, 23–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, C. A. (1980). Temperature-dependent survival and reproduction within populations of the ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialense on the fish host. Parasitology 81, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. A., Anderson, R. M. & Whitfield, P. J. (1979). Density-dependent survival and reproduction within populations of the ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialense on the fish host. Journal of Animal Ecology 48, 383–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, B. M. & Hockley, D. J. (1968). Effects of immunity on Nippostrongylus brasiliensis adult worms: reversible and irreversible changes in infectivity, reproduction, and morphology. Journal of Parasitology 54, 1073–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, P. W. (1974). Strategies for egg production. Evolution 28, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratcliffe, L. H. & Le Jambre, L. F. (1971). Increase of rate of egg production with growth in some intestinal nematodes of sheep and horses. International Journal for Parasitology 1, 153–6.Google Scholar
Reddington, J. J., Steward, G. L., Kramer, G. W. & Kramer, M. A. (1981). The effects of host sex and hormones on Trichinella spiralis in the mouse. Journal of Parasitology 67, 548–55.Google Scholar
Sinniah, B. (1982). Daily egg production of Ascaris lumbricoides: the distribution of eggs in the faeces and the variability of egg counts. Parasitology 84, 167–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, J. A., Falvo, R. & Bone, L. W. (1984). Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nematoda). Journal of Parasitology 69, 890–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasai, S. S. (1966). Experimental studies of Clonorchis sinensis in albino-rats. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 15, 66.Google Scholar
Tinsley, R. C. & Owen, R. W. (1975). Studies on the biology of Protopolystoma xenopodis (Monogenoidea): the oncomiracidium and life-cycle. Parasitology 71, 445–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar