Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T01:53:26.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further work on the comparative efficacy of different culicifuges under laboratory conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. N. Roy  and
S. M. Ghosh
D. N. Roy
Affiliation:
School of Tropical Medicine, Calcutta
S. M. Ghosh
Affiliation:
School of Tropical Medicine, Calcutta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A preliminary report on the results of our studies on the comparative efficacy of different culicifuges under laboratory conditions has been published (Roy, Ghosh & Chopra, 1942).

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 34 , Issue 3-4 , November 1942 , pp. 291 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boyd, J. E. M. (1932). J. Roy. Army Med. Cps, 68, 179.Google Scholar
Covell, G. (1941). Malaria Control by Anti-Mosquito Measures, 2nd ed., p. 34. Calcutta: Thacker Spink and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Dover, C. (1930). Ind. J. Med. Res. 17, 96.Google Scholar
Howard, L. O., Dyar, H. G. & Knab, F. (1912). The Mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies, 1, 365. Washington: Carnegie Institute.Google Scholar
Macnay, C. G. (1939). Canad. Ent. 71, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnay, C. G. (1939). Abstract in Rev. Appl. Ent. B, 27, 202.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. C. (1940). J: Roy. Navy Med. Serv. 26, 346.Google Scholar
Roy, D. N., Ghosh, S. M. & Chopra, R. N. (1942). Comparative efficacy of different culicifuges under laboratory conditions. Parasitology, 34, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syddiq, M. M. (1938). Ind. Med. Gaz. 73, 676.Google Scholar