Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T10:20:34.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the histology and ultrastructure of Cysticercus longicollis, the cysticercus of Taenia crassiceps Zeder, 1800, (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. J. Baron
P. J. Baron
Affiliation:
Biology Department, West Ham College of Technology, London, E. 15
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Studies with both the light and electron microscope on the bladder wall of Cysticercus longicollis have revealed details of its structure and shown that it contains structures comparable with those of adult cestodes. The structure of the everted scolex of the fully developed cysticercus has also been studied. Development of the scolex and rostellum has been briefly considered and is similar to that of C. fasciolaris and C. pisiformis. The importance of the tegument in both bladder wall and scolex is emphasised.

The rostellar hooks appear first as small cones to which a base is added after some growth has occurred. Mature and immature hooks probably contain keratin. Results of histochemical tests on this and other parts of the cysticercus have been given.

Thanks are due to Dr L. G. Goodwin, Director of the Nuffield Institute of Comparative Medicine, London Zoo, for allowing the author to use the EM 6 B and photographic facilities. Dr J. Mahon of Imperial College, London, kindly read the script, gave advice on it and provided photomicrographic facilities. The author is grateful to the Principal and Governors of West Ham College of Technology for general and financial support of the project.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , August 1968 , pp. 497 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baron, P. J. (1968). Unpublished histochemical work on Dipylidium caninum.Google Scholar
Björkman, N. & Hellström, B. (1965). Lead-ammonium acetate; a staining medium for electron microscopy free of contamination by carbonate. Stain Technol. 40, 169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bott, A. (1898). Über einen durch Knospung sich vermehrenden Cysticercus aus Maulwurf. Z. wiss. Zool. 63, 115–40.Google Scholar
Brand, T. von, Mercado, T. I., Nylen, M. U. & Scott, D. B. (1960). Observations on function, composition, and structure of cestode calcareous corpuscles. Expl Parasit. 9, 205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crusz, H. (1947). The early development of the rostellum of Cysticercus fasciolaris Rud., and the chemical nature of its hooks. J. Parasit. 33, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crusz, H. (1948). Further studies on the development of Cysticercus fasciolaris and Cysticercus pisiformis with special reference to the growth and sclerotization of the rostellar hooks. J. Helminth. 22, 179–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. S. (1962). Studies on the biology of Taenia crassiceps (Zeder, 1800) Rudolphi, 1810 (Cestoda). Can. J. Zool. 40, 969–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, I. H. C. (1964). Chemical composition of hooks isolated from hydatid scolices. Expl Parasit. 15, 110–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gläser, H. (1909). Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Cysticercus longicollis Rud. Z. wiss. Zool. 92, 540–61.Google Scholar
Johri, L. N. & Smyth, J. D. (1956). A histochemical approach to the study of helminth morphology. Parasitology 46, 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, D. (1965). Techniques for Electron Microscopy, 2nd ed.560 pp. Oxford: Blackweĺl Ltd.Google Scholar
Kent, H. N. (1957). Aspect biochimique de la spécifité chez les cestodes. In Symposium on Host Specificity and Parallel Evolution among Parasites, pp. 293–308. Ed. Baer, J.. Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L., Rothman, A. H. & Senturia, J. B. (1963). Esterases in Hymenolepis and in Hydatigera. Expl Parasit. 14, 285–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leuckart, K. G. F. R. (1856). Die Blasenbandwürmer und ihre Entwicklung, 162 pp. Giessen: W. Keller.Google Scholar
Lillie, R. D. (1965). Histopathologic Technique and Practical Histochemistry, 715 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Lumsden, R. D. (1965). Macromolecular structure of glycogen in some cyclophyllidean and trypanorhynch cestodes. J. Parasit. 51, 501–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, K. (1966). The chemical nature and evolutionary significance of monogenean attachment sclerites. Parasitology 56, 63–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCaig, M. L. O. & Hopkins, C. A. (1965). Studies on Schistocephalus solidus. 3. In vitro cultivation of the plerocercoid. Parasitology 55, 257–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, G. P. & Threadgold, L. T. (1967). A presumed sensory structure associated with the tegument of Schistosoma mansoni. J. Parasit. 53, 537–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morseth, D. J. (1967). Observations on the fine structure of the nervous system of Echino-coccus granulosus. J. Parasit. 53, 492–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearse, A. G. E. (1960). Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied, 2nd ed.998 pp. London: J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google Scholar
Race, G. J., Larsh, J. E., Esch, G. W. & Martin, J. H. (1965). A study of the larval stage of Multiceps serialis by electron microscopy. J. Parasit. 51, 364–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P. (1955). Intestinal physiology and the host-parasite relationship. In Some Physiological Aspects and Consequences of Parasitism, pp. 27–43. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, E. S. (1963). The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosario, B. (1962). The ultrastructure of the cuticle in the cestodes Hymenolepis nana and H. diminuta. Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Electon Microsc. Philadelphia. LL, 18.Google Scholar
Rothman, A. H. (1959). The physiology of tapeworms correlated to structures seen with the electron microscope. J. Parasit. 45, Suppl. 28. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
Rothman, A. H. (1960). Ultramicroscopic evidences of absorptive function in cestodes. J. Parasit. 46, Suppl. sect. 2, 10. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
Rothman, A. H. (1963). Electron microscopic studies of tapeworms: the surface structures of Hymenolepis diminuta (Rudolphi 1819) Blanchard 1891. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 82, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Threadgold, L. T. (1962). An electron microscope study of the tegument and associated structures of Dipylidium caninum. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 103, 135–40.Google Scholar
Threadgold, L. T. (1965). An electron microscope study of the tegument and associated structures of Proteocephalus pollanicoli. Parasitology 55, 467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar