Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T05:56:52.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the life-cycle of Spirochaeta1gallinarum

Preliminary Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

E. Hindle
Affiliation:
(From the Laboratories of Professors Mesnil and Marchoux, Institut Pasteur, Paris; and the Quick Laboratory, Cambridge.)

Extract

The life-cycle of S. gallinarum may be briefly summarised as follows:

Commencing with the ordinary parasite in the blood of the fowl, the spirochaete grows until it reaches a certain length (16 μ–19 μ) and then divides by the peculiar mode of transverse division described above. This process is repeated and is probably the only method of multiplication of the parasite within the blood. When the spirochaetes disappear from the circulation some of them break up into coccoid bodies which, however, do not usually redevelop in the fowl. When the spirochaetes are ingested by Argas persicus, some of them pass through the gut wall into the coelomic fluid. From this medium they bore their way into the cells of the various organs of the tick and there break up into a number of coccoid bodies. These intracellular forms multiply by ordinary fission in the cells of the Malpighian tubules and gonads. Some of the coccoid bodies are formed in the lumen of the gut and Malpighian tubules. The result is that some of the coccoid bodies may be present in the Malpighian secretion and excrement of an infected tick and when mixed with the coxal fluid may gain entry into another fowl by the open wound caused by the tick's bite. They then elongate and redevelop into ordinary spirochaetes in the blood of the fowl, and the cycle may be repeated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acton, H. W. and Harvey, W. F. (1911). The Nature and Specificity of Negri Bodies. Parasitology, iv. 255272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour, A. (1908). Spirochaetosis of Sudanese Fowls. Third Report Wellcome Research Laboratories, 3858.Google Scholar
Balfour, A. (1911). The role of the infective granule in certain Protozoal infections as illustrated by the Spirochaetosis of Sudanese Fowls. Journ. Trop. Med. and Hyg., xiv. 113114.Google Scholar
Blanc, G. R. (1911). Les Spirochètes. Thèse de la Faculté de Médecine. Paris, Jouve & Cie.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, W. C. (1911). Brief notes on the Structure and Development of Spirochaeta anodontae Keysellitz. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., lvi. 387393.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. C. (1911). On Cristispira veneris nov. spec, and the Affinities and Classification of Spirochaets. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., lvi. 507541.Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B. and Porter, A. (1909). The mode of division of Spirochaeta recurrentis and S. duttoni, as observed in the living organism. Proc. Roy. Soc. lxxxi.B., 500505.Google Scholar
Gross, J. (1910). Cristispira nov. gen. Ein Beitrag zur Spirochaeten Frage. Mitth. Zool. Stat. Neapel, xx. 4193.Google Scholar
Gross, J. (1911). Über freilebende Spironemaceen. Mitth. Zool. Stat. Neapel, xx. 188203.Google Scholar
Hindle, E. (1909). The Life-History of Trypanosoma dimorphon. Univ. of California Publ., Zool., vi. 127144.Google Scholar
Hindle, E. (1911). The Transmission of Spirochaeta duttoni. Parasitology, iv. 133149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leishman, W. B. (1910). An address on the Mechanism of Infection in “Tick Fever” and on the Hereditary Transmission of Spirochaeta duttoni in the Tick. Lancet, clxxviii. 1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. (1909). Observations on the Division of Spirochaetes. Parasitology, ii. 267280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchoux, E. and Salimbeni, (1903). La Spirillose des Poules. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, xvii. 549580.Google Scholar
Noguchi, H. (1911). A method for the pure cultivation of Pathogenic Treponema pallidum. Journ. Exp. Med., xiv. 99108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prowazek, S. v. (1906). Morphologische und entwickelungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über Hühner-spirochaeten. Arb. a. d. kais. Gesundheitsamte, xxiii. 554569.Google Scholar
Prowazek, S. v. (1909). Zur Entwicklung von Spirochaeta gallinarum. Memorias do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz., i. 7980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunnicliff, R. (1906). The Identity of Fusiform Bacilli and Spirilla. Journ. Inf. Diseases, iii. 148155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar