Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:40:58.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Primary and secondary infections of the domestic chicken with Trichostrongylus tenuis (Nematoda), a parasite of red grouse, with observations on the effect on the caecal mucosa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT and the Game Conservancy, Newtonmore, Inverness-shire
D. L. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT and the Game Conservancy, Newtonmore, Inverness-shire
P. J. Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT and the Game Conservancy, Newtonmore, Inverness-shire

Summary

The course of primary and secondary infections with Trichostrongylus tenuis in the domestic chicken was investigated. Primary infections were established after the administration of single and trickle doses of infective-stage larvae. The worm burden in the caeca was highest after a single dose of 500 infective-stage larvae; this gave a mean of 87 nematodes per bird on days 8–9 of infection, 20 nematodes on day 14 and 0 on day 28 of infection. Following trickle doses of 60, 100, 200, 300, 400 or 500 infective-stage larvae, there was a rise and then a fall in nematode egg output in all groups. In chickens given a primary dose of 500 infective-stage larvae followed 30 days later by a single secondary dose of 500 infective-stage larvae, the mean worm burden during the secondary infection rose to 57 nematodes on day 9 of infection and then fell rapidly to 18 nematodes on day 15 and to 2 on day 30. Scanning electron microscopy showed changes in the caeca of infected birds, with the caecal surface being covered in a layer of mucus from 12 days after infection. Balls of blood-stained mucus containing nematodes were observed in the caecal droppings from day 9 of infection onwards. It is concluded that chickens rapidly expel an established infection of T. tenuis, unlike the normal host, the red grouse.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avery, R. A. (1966). Helminth parasites from wildfowl from Slimbridge. Journal of Helminthology 40, 281–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beer, J. V. (1981). Diseases of Gamebirds and Wildfowl. The Game Conservancy, Fordingbridge.Google Scholar
Clapham, P. A. (1935). Some helminth parasites from partridges and other English birds. Journal of Helminthology 13, 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cram, E. B. & Cuvillier, E. (1934). Observations on Trichostrongylus tenuis infestations in domestic and game birds in the United States. Parasitology 26, 340–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enigk, K., Dey-Hazra, A. & Batke, J. (1975). Epizootiology and treatment of helminth infections in geese. Acta Parasitologica Polonicaz 23, 367–72.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. & Whitlock, H. V. (1939). A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia 12, 50–2.Google Scholar
Hannah, J. & Behnke, J. M. (1982). Nematospiroides dubius in the jird Meriones unguiculatus: factors affecting the course of a primary infection. Journal of Helminthology 56, 329–38.Google Scholar
Hudson, P. J. (1986). The effect of a parasitic nematode on the breeding production of red grouse. Journal of Animal Ecology 55, 8592.Google Scholar
Miller, H. R. P. (1987). Gastrointestinal mucus, a medium for survival and for elimination of parasitic nematodes and protozoa. Parasitology 94, S77–S100.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. O. & Wilson, J. E. (1938). Observations on the helminth parasites of poultry in Scotland. Journal of Helminthology 16, 105–30.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, B. M. (1969). Immunity to Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. In Nippostrongylus and Toxoplasma. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology, vol. 7 (ed. Taylor, A. E. R.), pp. 3144. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, B. M. & Jones, V. E. (1971). Nippostrongylus brasiliensis: A review of immunity and the host/parasite relationship in the rat. Experimental Parasitology 29, 138–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, R. W. (1951). Helminth parasites of domesticated birds in mid-Wales. Journal of Helminthology 25, 105–30.Google Scholar
Portal, M. & Collinge, W. E. (1932). The partridge disease enquiry. Country Life 32, 524–5.Google Scholar
Potts, G. R., Tapper, S. C. & Hudson, P. J. (1984). Population fluctuations in red grouse. Analysis of bag records and a simulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology 53, 2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhakrishnan, C. V. & Ebrahimian, A. (1975). Occurrence of Amoebotaenia cuneata Linstow, 1872 (Cestoda: Dilepididae) and Trichostrongylus tenuis, Mehlis, 1846 (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) in indigenous chickens in South Iran. Journal of the Veterinary Faculty of the University of Tehran 30, 8592.Google Scholar
Sinski, E., Jeska, E. L. & Besubik, B. (1983). Expression of expulsion in Trichinella spiralis in mice. Journal of Parasitology 69, 1167–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoddard, H. L. (1931). The Bob White Quail, its Habits, Preservation and Increase. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. & Lloyd, M. (1976). Accelerated expulsion of Trichinella spiralis in mice given lymphoid cells and serum from infected donors. Parasitology 72, 307–15.Google Scholar
Watson, H., Lee, D. L. & Hudson, P. J. (1987) The effect of Trichostrongylus tenuis on the caecal mucosa of young, old and anthelmintic-treated wild red grouse, Lagopus lagopus scoticus. Parasitology 94, 405–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, G. R. & Wilson, L. P. (1978). Haematology, weight and condition of captive red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus) infected with caecal threadworm (Trichostrongylus tenuis). Research in Veterinary Science 25, 331–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed