Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T21:07:15.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does the US Media Have a Liberal Bias?

A Discussion of Tim Groseclose's Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2012

Brendan Nyhan
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, nyhan@dartmouth.edu

Abstract

In Left Turn: How Liberal Bias Distorts The American Mind, Tim Groseclose argues that media effects play a crucial role in American politics. His case rests on three arguments: (1) that journalists tend overwhelmingly to be liberal rather than conservative; (2) that their innate political bias slants their views in empirically measurable ways; and (3) that this bias fundamentally shapes American politics, by bringing US citizens further to the left than they would naturally be. According to Groseclose, in a world where media bias did not exist, American citizens would on average hold views close to those of Ben Stein or Bill O'Reilly. In such a world, John McCain would have defeated Barack Obama by a popular vote margin of 56%—42% in the 2008 presidential election.

In making these claims, Groseclose draws on his own research, and on recent media scholarship by both political scientists and economists, making the broader claim that peer-reviewed social science—which seeks to deal with problems such as endogeneity and selection bias—should be the starting point for public arguments about the role of the media. His book, then, is clearly an effort to bring social scientific arguments into mainstream debates. Groseclose makes no secret of his conservative political leanings—but recent books from left-leaning political scientists such as Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson are equally unapologetic. It is at least plausible that political scientists' typical unwillingness to engage directly in political arguments has weakened the discipline's capacity for public engagement.

In this symposium a diverse group of contributors have been invited to engage with Groseclose's arguments in ways that bring together specific empirical and/or theoretical points and arguments aimed at the broader “political science public sphere” that Perspectives on Politics seeks to nurture. Contributors were asked to consider these five questions: (1): How do we best measure media effects? (2): If media bias exists, what are its plausible sources? (3): Can one use work on media effects to determine what people's views would be in the absence of such bias? (4): Do you agree that American politics is insufficiently representative, and if so what do you consider the primary sources of this problem? (5): What kinds of political and/or media institutions or practices might enhance democratic discourse?—Henry Farrell, Associate Editor

Type
Review Symposium: Does the Us Media Have a Liberal Bias?
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colbert, Stephen. 2006. White House Correspondents' Association Dinner. April 29.Google Scholar
Cook, Timothy E. 2005. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Alessio, Dave, and Allen, Mike. 2000. “Media Bias in Presidential Elections: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Communication 50(4): 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow Jones & Co. 2005. “Dow Jones responds to UCLA media bias ‘study.’” Poynter Forums. December 21. http://web.archive.org/web/20070106093628/http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=10808, accessed December 22, 2005.Google Scholar
Gasper, John. 2011. “Shifting Ideologies? Re-examining Media Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6: 85102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, and Shapiro, Jesse. 2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica 78(1): 3571.Google Scholar
Greenberg, David. 1998. “Right Thinking: An Authorized History of a Foundation That Has Set the Conservative Agenda for 25 Years.” New York Times, May 10.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and Milyo, Jeffrey. 2005. “A Measure of Media Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4): 1191–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James. 2004. All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Judis, John. 2001. The Paradox of American Democracy: Elites, Special Interests, and the Betrayal of the Public Trust. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Lichter, S. Robert, Rothman, Stanley, and Lichter, Linda S.. 1986. The Media Elite. Bethesda, MD: Adler and Adler.Google Scholar
Lott, John R. Jr., and Hassett, Kevin A.. 2004. “Is Newspaper Coverage of Economic Events Politically Biased?” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Povich, Elaine. 1996. Partners and Adversaries: The Contentious Connection Between Congress and the Media. Arlington: Freedom Forum.Google Scholar
Waldman, Paul. 2005. “Former fellows at conservative think tanks issued flawed UCLA-led study on media's ‘liberal bias.’” Media Matters for America, December 21, http://mediamatters.org/research/200512220003, accessed December 21, 2005.Google Scholar
Washington Examiner. 2007. “Edwin Feulner: The Heritage Foundation's president revolutionized the Washington think tank scene.” October 1. http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/edwin-feulner-heritage-foundation-s-president-revolutionized-washington-think-tank-scene, accessed December 22, 2011.Google Scholar
Weaver, David Hugh, and Wilhoit, G. Cleveland. 1996. The American Journalist in the 1990s: U.S. News People at the End of an Era. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar