Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-pgkvd Total loading time: 0.585 Render date: 2022-08-14T09:25:05.491Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Looking for Sex in All the Wrong Places: Press Coverage and the Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Candidates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2009

Linda L. Fowler
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College. E-mail: linda.fowler@dartmouth.edu
Jennifer L. Lawless
Affiliation:
Women and Politics Institute, American University. E-mail: jennifer.lawless@american.edu

Abstract

Although female candidates have achieved parity on some dimensions, political institutions remain deeply gendered in how they structure the parameters of electoral competition. We rely on a new data set of gubernatorial races from the 1990s to address the theoretical and empirical challenges created by the interaction of gender, media content, and electoral institutions. Based on an analysis of 1,365 newspaper articles for 27 contests in which a woman held a major party nomination, we uncover evidence of continuing bias in media coverage. Yet significant coefficients on candidate sex tell only part of the story. Gendered contextual factors linked to the contest and state in which candidates compete, as well as the newspapers that cover their races, also affect women's experiences on the campaign trail. The major finding, however, is the presence of a powerful baseline effect favoring male candidates that is deeply embedded in U.S. politics. All else equal, women gubernatorial candidates suffer a substantial vote deficit that results from non-observable influences. The results support the emerging consensus among feminist theorists that greater focus on the political context is likely to produce bigger scholarly payoffs than is continued attention to observable differences between male and female candidates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, R. Douglas. 2005. Congress, the Press, and Political Accountability. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Banwart, Mary C., Bystrom, Dianne G., and Robertson, Terry. 2003. From the primary to the general election: A comparative analysis of candidate media coverage in mixed-gender 2000 races for governor and U.S. Senate. American Behavioral Scientist 46 (5): 658–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banwart, Mary C., and McKinney, Mitchell S.. 2005. A gendered influence in campaign debates? Analysis of mixed-gender United States Senate and gubernatorial debates. Political Communication 56 (4): 353–74.Google Scholar
Borrelli, MaryAnn, and Martin, Janet M.. 1997. The Other Elites: Women, Politics, and Power in the Executive Branch. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Braden, Maria. 1996. Women Politicians in the Media. Lexington: University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy. 2007. Gender in the aggregate, gender in the individual, gender and political action. Politics and Gender 3 (1): 104–24.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Bystrom, Dianne G., Banwart, Mary Christine, Kaid, Lynda Lee, and Robertson, Terry A.. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan, and Fox, Richard. 2006. Gender and Elections in America. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan, and Schreiber, Ronnee. 1997. Media coverage of women in the 103rd Congress. In Women, Media and Politics, ed. Norris, Pippa. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Decker, Cathleen. 1990. “Feinstein Pushes to Get Edge While Wilson's Away.” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 28: A1, A32.Google Scholar
Devitt, James. 1999. “Framing Gender on the Campaign Trail: Women's Executive Leadership and the Press.” New York: Report to the Women's Leadership Fund, http://64.233.167.104.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2005. Institutional gendering: Theoretical insights into the environment. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. 2d ed.New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia, and Kelly, Rita Mae. 1995. Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Fiber, Pamela, and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. A tougher road for women: Assessing the role of gender in Congressional elections. In Gender and American Politics, ed. Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue and Josephson, Jyl J.. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 2003. Gender stereotyping in state executive elections. Journal of Politics 65 (3): 833–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Woodall, Gina S.. 2005. Gender differences in U.S. Senators' presentation of self. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. 2d ed.New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Everitt, Joanna. 2003. Talking tough: Gender and reported speech in campaign news coverage. Political Communication 20 (3): 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, Dan. 2004. “Coya's Story.” Minnesota Public Radio, May 3.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 6379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2006. Feminist Inquiry: From Political Conviction to Methodological Innovation. New Brunswick: Rutgers.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Meyerhoff, Miriam. 1999. The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society 28 (2): 173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993a. The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993b. Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Valentino, Nicholas, Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Simon, Adam. 1997. Running as a woman: Gender stereotyping in women's campaigns. In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris, Pippa. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, Cathryn. 1994. Gender, legitimate authority, and leader-subordinate conversations. American Sociological Review 59 (1): 122–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junn, Jane. 2007. Square pegs and round holes: Challenges of fitting individual-level analysis to a theory of politicized context of gender. Politics and Gender 3 (1): 124–34.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1994. Does gender make a difference? An experimental examination of sex stereotypes and press patterns in statewide campaigns. American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 162–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia.Google Scholar
Karakowsky, Leonard, McBey, Kenneth, and Miller, Diane L.. 2004. Gender, perceived competence, and power plays. Small Group Research 35 (4): 407–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey. W. 2000. Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates' ideological prientations? Journal of Politics 62 (2): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post September 11th era. Political Research Quarterly 53 (3): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. The primary reason for women's under-representation: Re-evaluating the conventional wisdom. Journal of Politics 70 (1): 6782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, Mark. 1991. The impact of prejudice on female candidates: An experimental look at voter inference. American Politics Quarterly 19 (2): 248–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary US elections. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., Squire, Peverill, and Jewell, Malcolm E.. 2001. Who Runs for the Legislature? Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Niven, David. 2006. Throwing your hat out of the ring: Negative recruitment and the gender imbalance in state legislative candidacy. Politics and Gender 2 (4): 473–89.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997a. Introduction: Women, media and politics. In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris, Pippa. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997b. Women leaders worldwide: A splash of color in the photo op. In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris, P.. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2006. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy. 1993. The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 472–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausch, John D., Rozell, Mark, and Wilson, Harry L.. 1999. When women lose: A case study of media coverage of two gubernatorial campaigns. Women & Politics 20 (4): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Dean, Norma G.. 1989. Gender roles and political office: Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13 (June): 7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltzer, Richard A., Newman, Jody, and Leighton, Melissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Smith, Kevin B. 1997. When all's fair: Signs of parity in media coverage of female candidates. Political Communication 14: 7182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Eric R.A.N., and Fox, Richard L.. 2001. A research note: The electoral fortunes of women candidates for Congress. Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stall, Bill. 1990. “Wilson, Feinstein Hope to Harvest Farm-Rural Vote.” Los Angeles Times, October 21, A1, A33.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1994. Gender and Discourse. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1998. Women and Elective Office. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann. 2002. Gender, Language and Discourse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weir, Sara J. 1996. Women as governors: State executive leadership with a feminist face? In Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders, ed. Duke, Lois Lovelace. 2d ed.Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wells, Robert A., and King, Erika G.. 1998. “Gender and the Press: Newspaper Coverage of the 1990 California, Texas and Pennsylvania Gubernatorial Campaigns.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 3–6.Google Scholar
Westlye, Mark C. 1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
31
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Looking for Sex in All the Wrong Places: Press Coverage and the Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Candidates
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Looking for Sex in All the Wrong Places: Press Coverage and the Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Candidates
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Looking for Sex in All the Wrong Places: Press Coverage and the Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Candidates
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *