Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T03:58:02.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public Sociology in the Age of Social Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2017


I informally examine how the idea of public sociology has been affected by the rise of social media. New social media platforms disintermediate communication, make people more visible, and encourage public life to be measured. They tend to move the discipline from a situation where some people self-consciously do “public sociology” to one where more sociologists unselfconsciously do sociology in public. I discuss the character of such “latently public” work, the opportunities and difficulties it creates for individuals, and its tendency to be associated with academic fields that believe in what they are doing.

Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Bertram, Chris. 2014. “Notes on Academic Blogging.” Crooked Timber. Available at Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review 70: 428.Google Scholar
Cottom, Tressie McMillan. 2015. “Who Do You Think You Are: When Marginality Meets Academic Microcelebrity.” ADA Journal of Gender, New Media and Technology 7. Available at Scholar
Duggan, Maeve. 2015. “Mobile Messaging and Social Media 2015.” Pew Research Center. Available at Scholar
Fischer, Claude S. 1994. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gans, Herbert J. 2016. “Public Sociology and Its Publics.” American Sociologist 47: 311.Google Scholar
Healy, Kieran. 2015. “The Performativity of Networks.” European Journal of Sociology 56: 175205.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 2000. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar