Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-mhl4m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-22T11:50:49.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reconsidering the Middle: A Reply to Martin Gilens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reflections Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R. and Aldrich, John H.. 1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.” American Political Science Review 76(3): 502–21.10.1017/S0003055400188379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashir, Omar. 2015. “Testing Inferences about American Politics: A Review of the ‘Oligarchy’ Result.” Research and Politics. Forthcoming. http://rap.sagepub.com/content/2/4/2053168015608896.full.pdf+html?, accessed October 16, 2015.Google Scholar
Branham, J. Alexander, Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2015. “When do the Rich Win?” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Brunner, Eric, Ross, Stephen L., and Washington, Ebonya. 2013. “Does Less Income Mean Less Representation?” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(2): 5376.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher. 2013. “Social Context and Economic Biases in Representation.” Journal of Politics 75(3): 773–86.10.1017/S0022381613000376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2011. “Group Opinion and the Study of Representation.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 2015. “Income Inequality and Policy Responsiveness.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 1129.10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-094706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavin, Patrick. 2012. “Income Inequality and Policy Representation in the American States.” American Politics Research 40(1): 2959.10.1177/1532673X11416920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–81.10.1017/S1537592714001595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. and Nagler, Jonathan. 2014. Who Votes Now? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Jesse H. and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2013. “Economic Inequality and Representation in the U.S. House: A New Approach Using Population-Level Data.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. April 11–13, 2013.Google Scholar
Rigby, Elizabeth and Wright, Gerald C.. 2011. “Whose Statehouse Democracy? Policy Responsiveness to Poor versus Rich Constituents in Poor versus Rich States.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Sabl, Andrew. 2015. “The Two Cultures of Democratic Theory: Responsiveness, Democratic Quality, and the Empirical-Normative Divide.” Perspectives on Politics 13(2): 345–65.10.1017/S1537592715000079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher and Soroka, Stuart. 2011. “Inequality in Policy Responsiveness?” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar