Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-nqqt6 Total loading time: 0.231 Render date: 2022-07-05T23:02:01.963Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Understanding “Power Talk”: Language, Public Policy, and Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2008

Jocelyn Elise Crowley
Affiliation:
The Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (jocelync@rci.rutgers.edu)
Margaret Watson
Affiliation:
The Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (mwatson@alumni.rutgers.edu)
Maureen R. Waller
Affiliation:
Cornell University (mrw37@cornell.edu)

Abstract

This project expands upon social construction studies by critically examining the discourse patterns of two very different groups as they discuss their problems with the child support enforcement system: fathers' rights members (mostly white, middle class fathers who are organizing for emotional support and to reform the child support system) and fathers with children on welfare (mostly poor, African-American fathers). We use standard, qualitative analytical methods on primary, in-depth interview data collected from fathers' rights members, and compare that with in-depth interview data drawn from fathers with children on welfare. In brief, we find three overlapping perceptions in this policy area: child support awards are economically hurtful to fathers, child support obligations are not adjusted for other types of support, and child support enforcement discourages parental cooperation. However, we also show that while there is broad overlap in terms of the general nature of these complaints, each group's members use very different language to describe their difficulties. Fathers' rights members are much more likely to remain connected to the system, and while challenging current policy, do not champion lawbreaking as a viable means of demonstrating their opposition. Fathers with children on welfare, on the other hand, speak in terms that reflect their disconnection from these policies, and frequently reveal their subsequent choice to engage in evasive and even illegal behavior as viable means of expressing their dissatisfaction. Finally, we conclude that these different ways of speaking about public policy problems can have important implications for policymaker responsiveness, and ultimately, each group's political inclusion in a democratic society.Jocelyn Elise Crowley is Associate Professor of Public Policy at The Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (jocelync@rci.rutgers.edu). Margaret Watson has her Master's Degree in Public Policy from The Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (mwatson@alumni.rutgers.edu). Maureen R. Waller is Assistant Professor of Policy Analysis & Management, Cornell University (mrw37@cornell.edu). The authors would like to thank Joe Soss, Sandy Schram, Anne Schneider, Helen Ingram, M.B. Crowley, the Columbia University School of Social Work Seminar Series participants, the University of Washington West Coast Poverty Center Seminar Series participants, the NICHD Transition to Fatherhood Project, and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on this manuscript.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2008 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achatz, Mary, and Crystal A. MacAllum. 1994. Young Unwed Fathers: Report from the Field. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Anderson, Richard D. 1997. Speech and democracy in Russia: Responses to political texts in three Russian cities. British Journal of Political Science 27 (1): 2343.Google Scholar
Bensonsmith, Dionne. 2005. Jezebels, matriarchs, and welfare queens: The Moynihan report of 1965 and the social construction of African-American women in welfare policy. In Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy, ed. Anne L. Schneider and Helen M. Ingram. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Bertoia, Carl, and Janice Drakich. 1993. The fathers' rights movement: Contradictions in rhetoric and practice. Journal of Family Issues 14 (4): 592615.Google Scholar
Cassetty, Judith. 1978. Child Support and Public Policy: Securing Support from Absent Fathers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Coltrane, Scott, and Neal Hickman. 1992. The rhetoric of rights and needs: Moral discourse in the reform of child custody and child support laws. Social Problems 39 (4): 40020.Google Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2003a. The gentrification of child support enforcement services, 1950–1984. Social Services Review 77 (4): 585604.Google Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2003b. The Politics of Child Support in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2006. Organizational responses to the fatherhood crisis: The case of fathers' rights groups in the United States. Marriage and Family Review 39 (1/2): 99120.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 1990. Socialization of party activists: National convention delegates, 1972–1981. American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 111941.Google Scholar
Donovan, Mark C. 1993. Social constructions of people with AIDS: Target populations and United States policy, 1981–1990. Policy Studies Review 12 (3/4): 329.Google Scholar
Duffy, Gavan, Brian K. Frederking, and Seth A. Tucker. 1998. Language games: Dialogical analysis of INF negotiations. International Studies Quarterly 42 (2): 27194.Google Scholar
Dye, Thomas R. 1966. Politics, Economics, and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Easton, David. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Edin, Kathryn, and Laura Lein. 1997. Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 2000. Dialogue in the public sphere. In Discourse and Social Life, ed. Srikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard. Harlow, England: Longman.
Fineman, Martha. 1991. The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garfinkel, Irwin, Sara S. McLanahan, and Thomas L. Hanson. 1998. A patchwork portrait of nonresident fathers. In Fathers under Fire: The Revolution in Child Support Enforcement, ed. Irwin Garfinkel, Daniel R. Meyer, Sara S. McLanahan, and Judith A. Seltzer. New York: Russell Sage.
Garfinkel, Irwin, Daniel R. Meyer, and Sarah S. McLanahan. 1998. A brief history of child support policies in the United States. In Fathers under Fire: The Revolution in Child Support Enforcement, ed. Irwin Garfinkel, Sara S. McLanahan, Daniel R. Meyer, and Judith A. Seltzer. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gavanas, Anna. 2004. Fatherhood Politics in the United States: Masculinity, Sexuality, Race, and Marriage. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Goldberg, Stephanie B. 1997. Make room for daddy. American Bar Association Journal 82 (2): 4852.Google Scholar
Gonzalez Baker, Susan. 1993. Immigration reform: The empowerment of a new constituency. In Public Policy for Democracy, ed. Helen Ingram and Steven Rathgeb Smith. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Grall, Timothy. 2003. Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their Child Support, 2001. Current Population Reports, P60-225. U.S. Census Bureau.
Halliday, Michael, and Ruquaya Hasan. 1985. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University.
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.
Handler, Joel F., and Yeheskel Hasenfeld. 1991. The Moral Construction of Poverty: Welfare Reform in America. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Harris-Lacewell, Melissa. 2004. Barbershops, Bibles, and BET: Everyday Talk and Black Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. Congressional enactments of race-gender: Toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 52950.Google Scholar
Jenness, Valerie, David S. Meyer, and Helen Ingram. 2005. Social movements, public policy, and democracy: Rethinking the nexus. In Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy, ed. David S. Meyer, Valerie Jenness and Helen Ingram, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jensen, Laura S. 2005. Constructing and entitling America's original veterans. In Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy, ed. Anne L. Schneider and Helen M. Ingram. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review 88 (3): 56076.Google Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1995. Alternative views of crime: Legislative policymaking in gendered terms. Journal of Politics 57 (3): 696723.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, Kenneth Benoit, and John Garry. 2003. Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review 97 (2): 31131.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C. 1995. Social construction (continued). American Political Science Review 89 (2): 43741.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics 16 (4): 677715.Google Scholar
Medical Child Support Working Group (MCSWG). 2000. 21 Million Children's Health: Our Shared Responsibility: Medical Child Support Working Group's Report to the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Labor.
Mead, Lawrence, ed. 1997. The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Mellgren, Linda, Jennifer Burnszynski, Sarah Douglas, and Brian Sinclair-James. 2004. Characteristics of Families Using Title IV-D Services in 2001. Office of Human Services Policy, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Mettler, Suzanne. 2002. Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review 96 (2): 35165.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne, and Joe Soss. 2004. The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 5573.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne, and Eric Welch. 2004. Civic generation: Policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill on political involvement over the life course. British Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 497518.Google Scholar
Meyer, Michael. 2001. Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. London: Sage Publications.
Murphy, Edward U. 2003. “Men, poverty, and social welfare policy.” Ph.D. diss., Brandeis University.
Newton, Lina. 2005. ‘It is not a question of being anti-immigration’: Categories of deservedness in immigration policy making. In Deserving and Entitled: Social Construction and Public Policy, ed. Anne L. Schneider and Helen M. Ingram, Albany: State University of New York.
Office of Child Support Enforcement. 1989. Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) Twenty-third Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Office of Child Support Enforcement. 2002. Essentials for Attorneys in Child Support Enforcement, Office of Child Support Enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Office of Child Support Enforcement. 2005. Office of Child Support Enforcement, Fiscal Year 2004 Preliminary Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Pierson, Paul. 1993. When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics 45 (4): 595628.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Aaron Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ripley, Randall B., and Grace A. Franklin. 1986. Policy Implementation and Bureaucracy, Second Edition. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
Roberts, Paula, and Michelle Vinson. 2004. State Policy Regarding Pass-Tthrough and Disregard of Current Month's Child Support Collected for Families Receiving TANF-Funded Cash Assistance. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
Sarangi, Srikant, and Malcolm Coulthard. 2000. Discourses as topic, resource, and social practice: An introduction. In Discourse and Social Life, ed. Srikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard. Harlow, England: Longman.
Schlesinger, Mark, and Richard Lau. 2000. The meaning and measure of policy metaphors. American Political Science Review 94 (3): 61126.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne L., and Helen M. Ingram. 1993. Social construction of target populations for politics and policy. American Political Science Review 87 (2): 33447.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne L., and Helen M. Ingram. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Schneider, Anne L., and Helen M. Ingram. 2005. Introduction: Public policy and the social construction of deservedness. In Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Schram, Sanford F. 1995. Words of Welfare: The Poverty of Social Science and the Social Science of Poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Schram, Sanford F., and Joe Soss. 2002. Success stories: Welfare reform, policy discourse, and the politics of research. In Lost Ground: Welfare, Poverty, and Beyond, ed. Randy Albelda and Ann Withorn. Boston: South End.
Schriner, Kay. 2005. Constructing the democratic citizen: Idiocy and insanity in American suffrage law. In Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy, ed. Anne L. Schneider and Helen M. Ingram. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Schroedel, Jean Reith, and Daniel R. Jordan. 1998. Senate voting and social construction of target populations: A study of AIDS policy making, 1987–1992. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 23 (1): 10726.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Kay E. 1992. Child support obligations: What fathers say about paying. In Caring and Paying: What Mothers and Fathers Say about Child Support, ed. Frank F. Furstenberg, Kay E. Sherwood, and Mercer L. Sullivan. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
Sidney, Mara S. 2001. The origin of U.S. fair housing policy: Images of race, class, and markets. Journal of Policy History 13 (2): 181214.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Soss, Joe. 1999. Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review 93 (2): 36380.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe. 2000. Unwanted Claims: Politics, Participation, and the U.S. Welfare System. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
van Dijk, Teun. 1984. Prejudice in Discourse: An Analysis of Ethnic Prejudice in Cognition and Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waller, Maureen R. 2002. My Baby's Father: Unmarried Parents and Paternal Responsibility. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Williams, Gweneth I., and Rhys H. Williams. 1995. All we want is equality: Rhetorical framing in the fathers' rights movement. In Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems, ed. Joel Best. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Wilson, James Q. 1980. The politics of regulation. In The Politics of Regulation, ed. James Q. Wilson. New York: Basic Books.
Winsky-Mattei, Laura. 1998. Gender and power in American legislative discourse. Journal of Politics 60 (2): 44061.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1989. Introduction. In Language, Power, and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse, ed. Ruth Wodak. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. What DCA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. London: Sage Publications.
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Understanding “Power Talk”: Language, Public Policy, and Democracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Understanding “Power Talk”: Language, Public Policy, and Democracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Understanding “Power Talk”: Language, Public Policy, and Democracy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *