Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-qcsxw Total loading time: 0.359 Render date: 2022-08-09T22:54:30.929Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

When Do Governments Promote Women's Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Mala Htun
Affiliation:
New School for Social Research and Eugene Lang College. E-mail: htunm@newschool.edu
S. Laurel Weldon
Affiliation:
Purdue University. E-mail: weldons@purdue.edu

Abstract

This essay proposes a framework to analyze cross-national variation in women's legal rights. To explore the distinct logics of policy change, we disaggregate sex equality policies on two dimensions: 1) whether they improve the status of women as a group or alleviate gender-based class inequalities, and 2) whether or not they challenge the doctrine of organized religion and the codified tradition of major cultural groups. We show that policies promoting gender equality seek fundamental social change and therefore challenge historical patterns of state-society interaction concerning relations between the state and the market; the respective authority of the state, religion, and cultural groups; and the contours of citizenship. Different issues, however, challenge different aspects of these relations. What's more, the priorities, strategies, and effectiveness of advocates and opponents of change (including women's movements, left parties, international NGOs, and organized religion) are shaped by state capacity, policy legacies, international vulnerability, and the degree of democracy.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bashevkin, Sylvia. 1998. Women on the Defensive. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2000. Beyond Compare? Women's Movements in Comparative Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 37: 431–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2005. A Common Language of Gender? Politics & Gender I (1): 128–37.Google Scholar
Blofield, Merike, and Haas, Liesl. 2005. Defining a Democracy: Reforming the Laws on Women's Rights in Chile, 1990–2002. Latin American Politics and Society 47 (3): 3568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Lisa D. 2003. Gender and Governance. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Casimiro, Isabel, Kwesiga, Joy, Mungwa, Alice, and Tripp, Aili. 2009. Women in Movement: Transformations in African Political Landscapes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. 1993. Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Charrad, Mounira. 2001. States and Women's Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ann Marie. 2001. Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Isobel. 2004. The Payoff from Women's Rights. Foreign Affairs 48: 3.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1994. Mapping the Margins. In The Public Nature of Private Violence, ed. Fineman, M. and Mykitiuk, R.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dreze, Jean, and Sen, Amartya. 2002. India: Development and Participation. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, R. Amy. 1996. Sexual Subordination and State Intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Providence, Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Esping Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2007. Feminist Politics in the Age of Recognition: A Two-Dimensional Approach to Gender Justice. Studies in Social Justice 1 (1): 2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth, Clark, Ann Marie, and Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2005. Sovereignty, Democracy, and Global Civil Society: State-Society Relations at UN World Conferences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gelb, Joyce. 1989. Feminism and Politics: A Comparative Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gelb, Joyce, and Palley, Marian Lief. 1996. Women and Public Policies: Reassessing Gender Politics. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1989. The Transformation of Family Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan Blackall. 1993. Differences in Public Policies Toward Abortion: Electoral and Policy Context. In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, ed. Goggin, Malcolm L., U.S.A.: Sage.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernes, Helga. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Formation, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003a. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family Under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003b. Women and Democracy. In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, 2d ed., eds. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Shifter, Michael. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2005. What It Means to Study Gender and the State. Politics & Gender 1 (1): 157–66.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, K.. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2003. Political Parties and the Rhetoric and Realities of Democratization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide. Politics & Gender 2 (3): 303–27.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa, eds. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lycklama à Nijeholt, Geertje, Vargas, Virginia, and Wieringa, Sakia, eds. 1998. Women's Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean: The Triangle of Empowerment. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
March, James, and Olsen, Johan. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2005. Social Protection around the World: External Insecurity, State Capacity, and Domestic Political Cleavages. Comparative Political Studies 38 (6): 623–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Anthony. 1998. Making Race and Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 2006. Electoral Quotas: Frequency and Effectiveness, In Women, Quotas, and Politics, ed. Dahlerup, Drude. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 2003. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen. 2002. Political Citizenship and Democratization: The Gender Paradox. American Political Science Review 96 (3): 535–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Henry. 1989. Sweden: Social Democracy in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2002. Religion and Public Policy: Institutional, Cultural and Political Impact on the Shaping of Abortion Policies in the Industrialized Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 35 (2): 221–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Women and Human Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, A.S. 1993. Gender and Social Rights of Citizenship: the comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review 58 (June): 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Sabatier, Paul. Boulder CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheinstein, Max. 1972. Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Jeremy, Gustafsson, Gunnel, and Jordan, Grant. 1982. The Concept of Policy Style. In Policy Styles in Western Europe, ed. Richardson, Jeremy London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1994. Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War. International Organization 48 (2): 185214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie. 2003. “Legislative Representation in Latin America.” Ph.D. diss., University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie, and Mishler, William. 2005. An Integrated Model of Women's Representation. Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. 2005. Parité!: Sexual Equality and the Crisis of French Universalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Shehabuddin, Elora. 2008. Reshaping the Holy: Democracy, Development, and Muslim Women in Bangladesh. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Ganz, Marshall, and Munson, Ziad. 2000. A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review 94 (3): 527–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrentny, John. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride, and Mazur, Amy G., eds. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 2d ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Steinmo, Sven. 1992. Introduction: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. In Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, ed. Thelen, Kathleen, Steinmo, Sven, and Longstreth, Frank. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Lawrence. 1992. The Clash of Absolutes. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Weldon, S.L. 2002. Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Fiona. 1995. Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Class in Welfare States: A Framework for Comparative Analysis. Social Politics 2 (2): 127–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford Series in Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2005. Lived Body versus Gender: Reflections on Social Structure and Subjectivity. In On Female Body Experience: “Throwing Like a Girl” and other essays. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
147
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

When Do Governments Promote Women's Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

When Do Governments Promote Women's Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

When Do Governments Promote Women's Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *