Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

How Employers Recruit Their Workers into Politics—And Why Political Scientists Should Care


In the wake of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, many American private-sector employers now have the legal right to recruit their workers into politics and to fire or discipline employees who refuse to participate. How many firms and workers are engaged in this kind of political recruitment and why? And how have the opportunities for the political recruitment of workers by their employers changed over time? Drawing on national surveys of top corporate managers and workers, as well as a review of the legal literature, I provide initial answers to these questions and illustrate the implications of employer political recruitment for a range of substantive and normative issues in American politics. My findings invite further research and discussion about this feature of the American workplace and its effects on politics and policy.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Samuel Abrams , Torben Iversen , and David Soskice . 2010. “Informal Social Networks and Rational Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 41: 229–57.

Richard Franklin Bensel . 2004. The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Robert A Dahl . 1977. “On Removing Certain Impediments to Democracy in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 92(1): 120.

Lee Drutman . 2015. The Business of America is Lobbying: The Growth of Corporate Political Activity and the Future of American Pluralism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Ryan D. Enos , Anthony Fowler , and Lynn Vavreck . 2014. “Increasing Inequality: The Effect of GOTV Mobilization on the Composition of the Electorate.” Journal of Politics 76(1): 273–88.

Timothy Frye , Ora John Reuter , and David Szakonyi . 2014. “Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace.” World Politics 66(2).

Daniel J Galvin . 2016. “Deterring Wage Theft: Alt-Labor, State Politics, and the Policy Determinants of Minimum Wage Compliance.” Perspectives on Politics 14(2): 324350.

Jan E. Leighley and Jonathan Nagler . 2007. “Unions, Voter Turnout, and Class Bias in the U.S. Electorate, 1964–2004.” Journal of Politics 69(2): 430–41.

Isabela Mares . 2015. From Open Secrets to Secret Voting: Democratic electoral reforms and voter autonomy. Washington, DC: Cambridge University Press.

Diana C. Mutz and Jeffrey J. Mondak . 2006. “The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse.” Journal of Politics 68(1): 140–55.

Susan C. Stokes , Thad Dunning , Marcelo Nazareno , and Valeria Brusco , eds. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

David Weil . 2014. The Fissured Workplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Hertel-Fernandez supplementary material
Hertel-Fernandez supplementary material 1

 PDF (915 KB)
915 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 51 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 233 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.