Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 10
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Lawrence, Regina G. McGregor, Shannon C. Cardona, Arielle and Mourão, Rachel R. 2016. Communication and Midterm Elections.

    McGregor, Shannon C. Lawrence, Regina G. and Cardona, Arielle 2016. Personalization, gender, and social media: gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies. Information, Communication & Society, p. 1.

    O’Regan, Valerie and Stambough, Stephen 2016. Political Experience and the Success of Female Gubernatorial Candidates. Social Sciences, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 16.

    Conroy, Meredith Oliver, Sarah Breckenridge-Jackson, Ian and Heldman, Caroline 2015. From Ferraro to Palin: sexism in coverage of vice presidential candidates in old and new media. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 3, Issue. 4, p. 573.

    Dowling, Conor M. and Miller, Michael G. 2015. Can Information Alter Perceptions about Women's Chances of Winning Office? Evidence from a Panel Study. Politics & Gender, Vol. 11, Issue. 01, p. 55.

    Dunaway, Johanna and Lawrence, Regina G. 2015. What Predicts the Game Frame? Media Ownership, Electoral Context, and Campaign News. Political Communication, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 43.

    Poloni-Staudinger, Lori and Ortbals, Candice 2014. Gendering Abbottabad: Agency and Hegemonic Masculinity in an Age of Global Terrorism. Gender Issues, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 34.

    Andrew, Blake 2013. Political Journalism Represented by Headline News: Canadian Public and Commercial Media Compared. Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46, Issue. 02, p. 455.

    Fox, Richard L. and Lawless, Jennifer L. 2011. Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 59.

    Hayes, Danny 2011. When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution. Politics & Gender, Vol. 7, Issue. 02, p. 133.


Looking for Sex in All the Wrong Places: Press Coverage and the Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Candidates

  • Linda L. Fowler (a1) and Jennifer L. Lawless (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 August 2009

Although female candidates have achieved parity on some dimensions, political institutions remain deeply gendered in how they structure the parameters of electoral competition. We rely on a new data set of gubernatorial races from the 1990s to address the theoretical and empirical challenges created by the interaction of gender, media content, and electoral institutions. Based on an analysis of 1,365 newspaper articles for 27 contests in which a woman held a major party nomination, we uncover evidence of continuing bias in media coverage. Yet significant coefficients on candidate sex tell only part of the story. Gendered contextual factors linked to the contest and state in which candidates compete, as well as the newspapers that cover their races, also affect women's experiences on the campaign trail. The major finding, however, is the presence of a powerful baseline effect favoring male candidates that is deeply embedded in U.S. politics. All else equal, women gubernatorial candidates suffer a substantial vote deficit that results from non-observable influences. The results support the emerging consensus among feminist theorists that greater focus on the political context is likely to produce bigger scholarly payoffs than is continued attention to observable differences between male and female candidates.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Mary C. Banwart , Dianne G. Bystrom , and Terry Robertson . 2003. From the primary to the general election: A comparative analysis of candidate media coverage in mixed-gender 2000 races for governor and U.S. Senate. American Behavioral Scientist 46 (5): 658–76.

Barbara C. Burrell 1994. A Woman's Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Richard L. Fox 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Elisabeth Gidengil , and Joanna Everitt . 2003. Talking tough: Gender and reported speech in campaign news coverage. Political Communication 20 (3): 209–32.

Ange-Marie Hancock . 2007. When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 6379.

Janet Holmes , and Miriam Meyerhoff . 1999. The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society 28 (2): 173–83.

Leonie Huddy , and Nayda Terkildsen . 1993a. The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.

Leonie Huddy , and Nayda Terkildsen . 1993b. Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.

Cathryn Johnson . 1994. Gender, legitimate authority, and leader-subordinate conversations. American Sociological Review 59 (1): 122–35.

Kim Fridkin Kahn . 1994. Does gender make a difference? An experimental examination of sex stereotypes and press patterns in statewide campaigns. American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 162–95.

Leonard Karakowsky , Kenneth McBey , and Diane L. Miller . 2004. Gender, perceived competence, and power plays. Small Group Research 35 (4): 407–39.

Jeffrey. W. Koch 2000. Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates' ideological prientations? Journal of Politics 62 (2): 414–29.

Jennifer L. Lawless , and Kathryn Pearson . 2008. The primary reason for women's under-representation: Re-evaluating the conventional wisdom. Journal of Politics 70 (1): 6782.

Mark Leeper . 1991. The impact of prejudice on female candidates: An experimental look at voter inference. American Politics Quarterly 19 (2): 248–61.

Monika L. McDermott 1998. Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895918.

Monika L. McDermott 1997. Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary US elections. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.

Wendy Rahn . 1993. The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 472–96.

John D. Rausch , Mark Rozell , and Harry L. Wilson . 1999. When women lose: A case study of media coverage of two gubernatorial campaigns. Women & Politics 20 (4): 122.

Shirley M. Rosenwasser , and Norma G. Dean . 1989. Gender roles and political office: Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13 (June): 7785.

Kira Sanbonmatsu . 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Kevin B. Smith 1997. When all's fair: Signs of parity in media coverage of female candidates. Political Communication 14: 7182.

Eric R.A.N. Smith , and Richard L. Fox . 2001. A research note: The electoral fortunes of women candidates for Congress. Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *