Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Understanding “Power Talk”: Language, Public Policy, and Democracy

  • Jocelyn Elise Crowley (a1), Margaret Watson (a2) and Maureen R. Waller (a3)
Abstract

This project expands upon social construction studies by critically examining the discourse patterns of two very different groups as they discuss their problems with the child support enforcement system: fathers' rights members (mostly white, middle class fathers who are organizing for emotional support and to reform the child support system) and fathers with children on welfare (mostly poor, African-American fathers). We use standard, qualitative analytical methods on primary, in-depth interview data collected from fathers' rights members, and compare that with in-depth interview data drawn from fathers with children on welfare. In brief, we find three overlapping perceptions in this policy area: child support awards are economically hurtful to fathers, child support obligations are not adjusted for other types of support, and child support enforcement discourages parental cooperation. However, we also show that while there is broad overlap in terms of the general nature of these complaints, each group's members use very different language to describe their difficulties. Fathers' rights members are much more likely to remain connected to the system, and while challenging current policy, do not champion lawbreaking as a viable means of demonstrating their opposition. Fathers with children on welfare, on the other hand, speak in terms that reflect their disconnection from these policies, and frequently reveal their subsequent choice to engage in evasive and even illegal behavior as viable means of expressing their dissatisfaction. Finally, we conclude that these different ways of speaking about public policy problems can have important implications for policymaker responsiveness, and ultimately, each group's political inclusion in a democratic society.Jocelyn Elise Crowley is Associate Professor of Public Policy at The Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (jocelync@rci.rutgers.edu). Margaret Watson has her Master's Degree in Public Policy from The Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (mwatson@alumni.rutgers.edu). Maureen R. Waller is Assistant Professor of Policy Analysis & Management, Cornell University (mrw37@cornell.edu). The authors would like to thank Joe Soss, Sandy Schram, Anne Schneider, Helen Ingram, M.B. Crowley, the Columbia University School of Social Work Seminar Series participants, the University of Washington West Coast Poverty Center Seminar Series participants, the NICHD Transition to Fatherhood Project, and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on this manuscript.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Anderson, Richard D. 1997. Speech and democracy in Russia: Responses to political texts in three Russian cities. British Journal of Political Science 27 (1): 2343.

Bertoia, Carl, and Janice Drakich. 1993. The fathers' rights movement: Contradictions in rhetoric and practice. Journal of Family Issues 14 (4): 592615.

Coltrane, Scott, and Neal Hickman. 1992. The rhetoric of rights and needs: Moral discourse in the reform of child custody and child support laws. Social Problems 39 (4): 40020.

Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2003a. The gentrification of child support enforcement services, 1950–1984. Social Services Review 77 (4): 585604.

Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2006. Organizational responses to the fatherhood crisis: The case of fathers' rights groups in the United States. Marriage and Family Review 39 (1/2): 99120.

Dodson, Debra L. 1990. Socialization of party activists: National convention delegates, 1972–1981. American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 111941.

Donovan, Mark C. 1993. Social constructions of people with AIDS: Target populations and United States policy, 1981–1990. Policy Studies Review 12 (3/4): 329.

Duffy, Gavan, Brian K. Frederking, and Seth A. Tucker. 1998. Language games: Dialogical analysis of INF negotiations. International Studies Quarterly 42 (2): 27194.

Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. Congressional enactments of race-gender: Toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 52950.

Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review 88 (3): 56076.

Kathlene, Lyn. 1995. Alternative views of crime: Legislative policymaking in gendered terms. Journal of Politics 57 (3): 696723.

Laver, Michael, Kenneth Benoit, and John Garry. 2003. Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review 97 (2): 31131.

Lieberman, Robert C. 1995. Social construction (continued). American Political Science Review 89 (2): 43741.

Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics 16 (4): 677715.

Mettler, Suzanne. 2002. Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review 96 (2): 35165.

Mettler, Suzanne, and Joe Soss. 2004. The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 5573.

Mettler, Suzanne, and Eric Welch. 2004. Civic generation: Policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill on political involvement over the life course. British Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 497518.

Pierson, Paul. 1993. When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics 45 (4): 595628.

Schlesinger, Mark, and Richard Lau. 2000. The meaning and measure of policy metaphors. American Political Science Review 94 (3): 61126.

Schneider, Anne L., and Helen M. Ingram. 1993. Social construction of target populations for politics and policy. American Political Science Review 87 (2): 33447.

Schroedel, Jean Reith, and Daniel R. Jordan. 1998. Senate voting and social construction of target populations: A study of AIDS policy making, 1987–1992. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 23 (1): 10726.

Sidney, Mara S. 2001. The origin of U.S. fair housing policy: Images of race, class, and markets. Journal of Policy History 13 (2): 181214.

Soss, Joe. 1999. Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review 93 (2): 36380.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 23 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 138 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.