Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Writing Culture Doctrine: Public Anthropology, Military Policy, and World Making

  • Robert Albro (a1)
Extract

I concur with Michael Mosser that bridge-building between academic and military policy communities should be an important priority. I also agree that this is a challenging task. But my sense of why this is both important and challenging differs from Mosser's in some key respects. Despite qualifications along the way, Mosser's account suggests that academia has a particular responsibility to make itself legible and available to military policy makers, but not the other way around. As he explains, his topic grew from a project concerned about “whether the academy is asking militarily interesting questions.” And he proceeds by thinking about how academic scholarship might be “more tightly integrated” with the doings of military policy and planning. Undertaking bridge-building by firstly asking how the US academy can be more effectively leveraged to support national security goals sets up a largely one-sided and unilateral engagement, where the burden is primarily on academia to explain itself to the military policy community, and probably to do so within a frame of reference sensible to the policy crowd but not necessarily vice-versa. This sets up, in short, a scenario making it less likely for policy makers to listen to what academics might be saying, particularly whenever this appears to complicate established agendas. From my point of view, the best mutual outcomes flow from a more balanced dialogue. This includes policy makers taking academic frames at least as seriously when talking with them, so that greater clarity can be reached about how, and under what circumstances, scholarship might contribute to policy concerns, but also when academic contributions might be inappropriate, irrelevant, or even impossible.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Albro, Robert. 2006. “Adversary Culture Matters: Security Policy, Strategic Thinking and Research Practice.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association. San José, CA, November 15–19.
Albro, Robert. 2009. “The Culture Doctrine: ‘Military Culture’ and the Military's Culture Concept.” Presented at “The Professor and the Spy: Area Studies and the Politics of Global Security,” Rutgers University's Eagleton Institute of Politics, February 12.
Albro, Robert. 2010a. “The AAA and Global Circulating Anthropologies.” Anthropology News 51(4): 14.
Albro, Robert. 2010b. “Anthropology and the Military: AFRICOM, Culture, and the Future of Human Terrain Analysis.” Anthropology Today 26(1): 2224.
American Anthropological Association. 2008. “Long-Range Plan.” (http://www.aaanet.org/about/Governance/Long_range_plan.cfm), accessed July 10, 2010.
Atran, Scott, and Axelrod, Robert. 2010. “On Why We Talk with Terrorists.” New York Times, June 29.
Bacevich, Andrew. 2008. “The Petraeus Doctrine.” The Atlantic (October). (http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200810/petraeus-doctrine), accessed February 10, 2009.
Borofsky, Robert. 2002. “The Four Subfields: Anthropologists as Mythmakers.” American Anthropologist 104 (2): 463480.
Borofsky, Robert. 2004. Conceptualizing Public Anthropology. Electronic document, (http://www.publicanthropology.org/Defining/definingpa.htm), accessed July 15, 2010.
Brown, Keith. 2008. “All They Understand is Force: Debating Culture in Operation Iraqi Freedom.” American Anthropologist 110(4): 443–53.
Clemis, Martin G. 2009. “Crafting Non-Kinetic Warfare: The Academic-Military Nexus in US Counterinsurgency Doctrine.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 20(1): 160–84.
Commission on Anthropology's Engagement with the Security and Intelligence Communities (CEAUSSIC). 2007. Final Report. Submitted to the American Anthropological Association Nov. 4. (http://www.aaanet.org/pdf/upload/FINAL_Report_Complete.pdf).
Commission on Anthropology's Engagement with the Security and Intelligence Communities (CEAUSSIC). 2009. Final Report on the U.S. Army's Human Terrain System Proof-of-Concept Program. Submitted to the American Anthropological Association Oct. 14. (http://www.aaanet.org/cmtes/commissions/CEAUSSIC/upload/CEAUSSIC_HTS_Final_Report.pdf).
Connable, Ben, and Speyer, Art. 2004. “Cultural Awareness for Military Operations.” Cultural Awareness Working Group PowerPoint briefing. Author's files.
Davis, Rochelle. 2010. “Culture as a Weapon System.” Middle East Report 255 (http://www.merip.org/mer/mer255/davis.html), accessed July 31, 2010.
Eskander, Saad. 2008. “Minerva Research Initiative: Searching for the Truth or Denying Iraqis the Right to Know the Truth?” Social Science Research Council's Symposium on the Minerva Initiative. Posted October 29. (http://essays.ssrc.org/minerva/2008/10/29/eskander/), accessed August 1, 2010.
Foucault, Michel. 2001. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. 2d ed. New York: Routledge.
González, Roberto. 2007. “Towards Mercenary Anthropology? The New US Army Counterinsugency Manual FM 3-24 and the Military-Industrial Complex.” Anthropology Today 23(3): 1419.
Gregory, Derek. 2008. “The Rush to the Intimate: Counterinsurgency and the Cultural Turn in Late Modern Warfare.” Radical Philosophy 150 (http://www.radicalphilosophy.com/default.asp?channel_id=2369&editorial_id=26755), accessed July 23, 2009.
Gusterson, Hugh. 2010. “The Cultural Turn in the War on Terror.” In Anthropology and Global Counterinsurgency, ed. Kelly, J. and Jauregui, B.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hoffman, Frank G. 2006. Changing Tires on the Fly: The Marines and Postconflict Stability OPS. Philadelphia, PA: Foreign Policy Research Institute.
Hoffman, Frank G. 2007. “Neo-Classical Counterinsurgency.” Parameters Summer: 7187.
Jean, Grace V. 2010. “Culture Maps Becoming Essential Tools of War.” National Defense Magazine, February.
Mannheim, Bruce, and Tedlock, Dennis. 1995. “Introduction.” In The Dialogic Emergence of Culture, ed. Tedlock, D. and Mannheim, B.. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
McFate, Montgomery. 2005. “Anthropology and Counterinsurgency: The Strange Story of their Curious Relationship.” Military Review 85(2): 2438.
Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Nagl, John. 2007a. “Foreword.” In Counterinsurgency Field Manual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nagl, John. 2007b. “Desperate People with Limited Skills: Writing and Employing the Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Manual.” Small Wars Journal, November 1. (http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/2007/11/desperate-people-with-limited/), accessed February 11, 2009.
Nugent, David. 2008. “Operations other than War: The Politics of Academic Scholarship in the 21st Century.” Social Science Research Council's Symposium on the Minerva Initiative. Posted October 20. http://essays.ssrc.org/minerva/2008/10/20/nugent/, accessed June 29, 2010.
Petraeus, David. 2006. “The Surge of Ideas: Coindinistas and Change in the U.S. Army in 2006.” Speech given to the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. May 6, 2010. (http://www.aei.org/speech/100142), accessed August 1, 2010.
Power, Samantha. 2007. “Our War on Terror.” New York Times, July 29.
Price, David. 2007. “Pilfered Scholarship Devastates General Petraeus's Counterinsurgency Manual.” Counterpunch, October 30. (http://www.counterpunch.org/price10302007.html), accessed February 10, 2009.
Price, David. 2010. “The Army's Take on Culture.” Anthropology Now 2(1): 5763.
Roxborough, Ian. 2008. “The Military-Social Science Interface.” Social Science Research Council's Symposium on the Minerva Initiative. Posted October 29. (http://essays.ssrc.org/minerva/2008/10/29/roxborough/), accessed April 3, 2010.
Thornton, Robert. 1988. “The Rhetoric of Ethnographic Holism.” Cultural Anthropology 3(3): 285303.
US Army and Marine Corps. 2007. Counterinsurgency Field Manual: US Army Field Manual No. 3-24 and Marine Corps Warfighting Publication No. 3-33.5. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
US Department of Defense. 2010. DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms: Joint Publication 1-02. (http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf), accessed January 19, 2009.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 50 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 206 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.