Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T15:35:16.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Values, Health, and Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

William K. Goosens
William K. Goosens*
Affiliation:
Lawrence University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues for the importance of approaching medicine, as a theoretical science, through values. The normative concepts of benefit and harm are held to provide a framework for the analysis of medicine which reflects the obligations of the doctor-patient relationship, suffices to define the key concept of medical relevance, yields a general necessary condition for the basic concepts of medicine, explains the role of such nonnormative conceptions as discomfort, dysfunction, and incapacity, and avoids the mistakes of other normative approaches which hold that unhealthy conditions are disvaluable or should be treated. Neutralist analyses are criticized, especially those approaching health through proper functioning.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 100 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Ancestors of this paper benefited from insightful questions from the Department of Philosophy, Purdue University, and from correspondence with Christopher Boorse and David Hull.

References

Boorse, C. (1975) “On the Distinction Between Disease and Illness” Philosophy and Public Affairs 5: 69–89.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. (1977) “Health as a Theoretical Concept” Philosophy of Science 44: 542–73.10.1086/288768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, H. T. Jr. (1975) “The Concepts of Health and Disease” in Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences (Ed. Engelhardt, H. T. and Spicker, S. F.) Reidel: Dordrecht, Holland. Pages 125–42.10.1007/978-94-010-1769-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, H. T. Jr. (1976) “Ideology and Etiology” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1: 256–68.10.1093/jmp/1.3.256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. (1976) “The Concept of Disease” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1: 238–55.10.1093/jmp/1.3.238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartofsky, M. W. (1975) “Organs, Organisms and Disease: Human Ontology and Medical Practice” in Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences (Ed. Engelhardt, H. T. and Spicker, S. F.) Reidel: Dordrecht, Holland. Pages 67–84.10.1007/978-94-010-1769-5_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbeck, C. (1978) “Four Basic Concepts of Medical Science” in Proceedings of the 1978 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 1, (ed. P. D. Asquith and I. Hacking.) Philosophy of Science Association: East Lansing, Michigan. Pages 210–22.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press: Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Wright, G. H. von (1963) The Varieties of Goodness. Routeledge & Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar