Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T01:03:18.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Horgan and Tienson on Ceteris Paribus Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Marcello Guarini
Marcello Guarini*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Windsor
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4; e-mail: marcello_guarini@hotmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Terence Horgan and John Tienson claim that folk psychological laws are different in kind from basic physical laws in at least two ways: first, physical laws do not possess the kind of ceteris paribus qualifications possessed by folk psychological laws, which means the two types of laws have different logical forms; and second, applied physical laws are best thought of as being about an idealized World and folk psychological laws about the actual world. I argue that Horgan and Tienson have not made a persuasive case for either of the preceding views.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 301 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for financial support during the early stages of the research that lead to this paper. I also thank Ausonio Marras, William Demopoulos, and William Rappaport for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

Fodor, Jerry (1991), “You Can Fool Some of the People All of the Time, Everything Else Equal: Hedged Laws and Psychological Explanations”, Mind 100: 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Terence and Tienson, John (1996), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, a Bradford Book.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Geoffrey (1980), “The Many Sciences and the One World”, The Journal of Philosophy LXXVII: 773–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietroski, Paul and Rey, Georges (1995), “When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 81–110.10.1093/bjps/46.1.81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen (1991), “Ceteris Paribus Laws”, Mind 100: 1–17.10.1093/mind/C.397.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar