Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T19:14:26.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Philosophy of Chemistry Reformulating Itself: Nalni Bhushan and Stuart Rosenfeld's Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

S.H. Vollmer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophers of chemistry, following the lead of physicists, have been slow to realize that molecular descriptions issuing from quantum mechanics in the absence of chemical theory are fatally flawed. In the wake of this realization, new topics have begun to unfold—including new metaphysical issues, new concerns about the philosophy of chemistry's place in the philosophy of science, and new accounts of how properties are observed, inferred, and presented. A recent collection of essays, Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry edited by Nalini Bhushan and Stuart Rosenfeld, reveals what some of these new issues are and suggests new directions for the philosophy of chemistry.

Type
Book Reviews
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 383 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to George Graham, Nancy Hall, Harold Kincaid, Vyavuka Masimasi, and an anonymous reviewer for many helpful suggestions.

References

Bhushan, Nalini, and Rosenfeld, Stuart (eds.) (2000), Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhushan, Nalini, and Rosenfeld, Stuart (2000a), “Chemical Synthesis: Complexity, Similarity, Natural Kinds, and the Evolution of a Logic”, in Bhushan and Rosenfeld 2000, 287–207.Google Scholar
Dirac, Dirac Paul Adrian (1929), “Quantum Mechanics of Many-Electron Systems”, Quantum Mechanics of Many-Electron Systems A123:714–733.Google Scholar
Paneth, Fritz (1962), “The Epistemological Status of the Concept of Element”, The Epistemological Status of the Concept of Element 13:1–14, 144–166.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2000), “Realism, Essentialism, and Intrinsic Properties: The Case of Molecular Shape”, in Bhushan and Rosenfeld 2000, 118–128.Google Scholar
Scerri, Eric (2000), “Realism, Reduction, and the ‘Intermediate Position’”, in Bhushan and Rosenfeld 2000, 51–72.Google Scholar
Vollmer, S.H. (2003), “The Primary Properties?”, in Joseph Earley (ed.), Chemical Explanation: Characteristics, Development, Autonomy, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Woody, Andrea, and Glymour, Clark (2000), “Missing Elements: What Philosophers of Science Might Discover in Chemistry”, in Bhushan and Rosenfeld 2000,17–33.Google Scholar
Woolley, R. Guy (1985), “The Molecular Structure Conundrum”, The Molecular Structure Conundrum 62:1082–1084.Google Scholar